Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic and Antique Trucks > 1961 - 1966 F-100 And Larger F-Series Trucks
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

1961 - 1966 F-100 And Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Slick Sixties Ford Truck SPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 03:02 PM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker jowilker is offline
Post Fiend
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 17,091
jowilker has a great reputation on FTE. jowilker has a great reputation on FTE. jowilker has a great reputation on FTE. jowilker has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertha66 View Post
The frames up to the mid 70's are all the same, but the later 70's trucks the wheel base cahanged something like 2", and I'm not sure of the years that are longer. The body would still bolt on,but there will be a gap between the cab and bed.
Allen, It was 73 that the 4 in" was added to the rear of the cab behind the cab/front clip mount points and lengthened the chassis.



John
__________________
In the cool still quiet hours of night, you can hear chevies rusting away.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2009, 12:29 PM
bertha66's Avatar
bertha66 bertha66 is offline
Posting Guru
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 2,466
bertha66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks, John. I don't have any trucks in the 70's, so it's hard to keep up or remember. I have CRS problems.
__________________
Allen D
1966 F-100 4x4 with 390 GT engine
1990 Areostar 2wd XLT ext
1980 Bronco with 460
1964 Galaxie 500 with 428
Oregon Chapter Member: To join the Oregon Chapter, click HERE
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2009, 11:32 AM
IsoGrifo's Avatar
IsoGrifo IsoGrifo is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 344
IsoGrifo is starting off with a positive reputation.
what about throwing a 351 windsor in? I mean, bigger than a 302 and still a sb? just a thought, oh! hey! I thought I read somewhere that the 351 cleveland was once used in trucks, not sure what year, anybody ever heard this?
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2009, 11:36 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is online now
Ford Parts Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights, CA
Posts: 26,542
NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsoGrifo View Post
I thought I read somewhere that the 351 cleveland was once used in trucks, not sure what year, anybody ever heard this?
No 351C's were ever factory installed in F100/350's.

1970/74 passenger cars & Ranchero's only.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Partsman (1962/97) / SoCal Chapter Member.

Part Number Research: Trucks: 1928/2000 // Cars: 1928/79.

1934 Packard V12 Convertible Victoria // 2008 Fusion S // 2008 Edge SEL.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2009, 01:44 PM
jowilker's Avatar
jowilker jowilker is offline
Post Fiend
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Creedmoor, North Carolina
Posts: 17,091
jowilker has a great reputation on FTE. jowilker has a great reputation on FTE. jowilker has a great reputation on FTE. jowilker has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NumberDummy View Post
No 351C's were ever factory installed in F100/350's. 1970/74 passenger cars & Ranchero's only.
Bill, Does that mean that he can't install one??



John
__________________
In the cool still quiet hours of night, you can hear chevies rusting away.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2009, 01:45 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy NumberDummy is online now
Ford Parts Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hacienda Heights, CA
Posts: 26,542
NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation NumberDummy has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by jowilker View Post
Bill, Does that mean that he can't install one??
John
No, of course not...all I did was correct what IsoGrifo said about 351C's being factory installed in F100/350's.

351M's and 400's were factory installed in 1977/79 F100/350's ('80/82 F150/350's), but not 351C's in any year.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Partsman (1962/97) / SoCal Chapter Member.

Part Number Research: Trucks: 1928/2000 // Cars: 1928/79.

1934 Packard V12 Convertible Victoria // 2008 Fusion S // 2008 Edge SEL.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2009, 02:54 AM
buckarooranch's Avatar
buckarooranch buckarooranch is offline
New User
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Spangle, WA
Posts: 23
buckarooranch is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bertha66 View Post
Thanks, John. I don't have any trucks in the 70's, so it's hard to keep up or remember. I have CRS problems.
Sure sounds like you have the same rig! What tranny are you running?
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2009, 12:12 PM
bertha66's Avatar
bertha66 bertha66 is offline
Posting Guru
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 2,466
bertha66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckarooranch View Post
Sure sounds like you have the same rig! What tranny are you running?
It has been along time sense I looked, but if I remember right, CRS, it is a np435 with a married transfer case. I run a 67 Fairlane GT 390 engine. The steering is off a 87 Toyota 4x4. The engine, paint, wheels and the steering is about the only thing that is not stock.
__________________
Allen D
1966 F-100 4x4 with 390 GT engine
1990 Areostar 2wd XLT ext
1980 Bronco with 460
1964 Galaxie 500 with 428
Oregon Chapter Member: To join the Oregon Chapter, click HERE
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 02-17-2009, 01:17 AM
fordtrucksforever fordtrucksforever is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DFW USA
Posts: 273
fordtrucksforever is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 5.0 from Bronco will only get around 12-13 mpg unless you never push down the gas pedal. Going with a Car style 5.0 may yield a mile or 2 more. Any offroading excursions will totally kill all mpg gained for that tank of fuel. If you could locate a NV 4500 for a fair price, it is easy to adapt to stock bellhousing. Adapters are made to bolt up a Dana 20 transfer case. I believe it mounts same as the Dana 21. This will give you a bulletproof tranny very well suited for offroad and with decent OD for some fuel economy. I retired a 78 Bronco recently powered by a stock 351M400 motor with 435 granny 4 speed. Even with 35" tires it got 14-15 mpg for some reason. Even with a 16 year old kid with lead implants in his feet still suprised me.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2009, 09:05 PM
buckarooranch's Avatar
buckarooranch buckarooranch is offline
New User
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Spangle, WA
Posts: 23
buckarooranch is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm back!

First, I want to thank everyone who commented a few months ago when my son & I started looking at this project. Since then, grandson & Grandpa made a deal for the truck purchase....now, we're back soliciting ideas. The project has been on hold while my son has been working to fund the project.

Here's where we "think" we should start.....

1) Our 390 is most likely the best idea for moving the truck down the road. Too many folks tell me the 5.0 that I sourced from an '86 Bronco would have to work too hard to move the old truck down the road and the end result would still be bad mileage...with LESS power to boot.

2) The AOD MAY be an option as an adapter is available, AND I have a transfer case that goes with it from the Bronco to give us an overdrive option.

3) I like the idea of an NV4500 to keep a manual shift and give us an overdrive. Does anyone know of an adapter available and what would it take to operate the linkage or is there a slave cylinder setup I need to fabricate? Seems to me I would need to find a transfer case that would fit as well. That way, we could rebuild the 390 now and look for the available parts and swap when we find them.

4) I also like the option of swapping the body to a newer truck running gear. We have been looking for one, but nothing so far...as daunting as that seems to me in lifting the mass.

Well, any ideas would be GREATLY appreciated. You all have been EXTREMELY helpful. I will try to figure out how to attach a photo of the truck

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 01:27 AM
buckarooranch's Avatar
buckarooranch buckarooranch is offline
New User
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Spangle, WA
Posts: 23
buckarooranch is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would love to hear about bertha66's toyota steering swap. Any info you can pass down? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 02:11 PM
bertha66's Avatar
bertha66 bertha66 is offline
Posting Guru
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 2,466
bertha66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckarooranch View Post
I would love to hear about bertha66's toyota steering swap. Any info you can pass down? Thanks.
I used a box out of a 87 Toyota 4x4. When I got the box, I also took the P/S lines that run from the pump to the box.
I removed the driver side fender and inter fender for better access.
1. Remove the old steering box and the steering link that runs from the box to the drag link.
2. Place the new box in the same place as the old one. mark the holes that need to be drilled, drill and tap into the frame, or drill all the way and put in a bolt and nut.
3. The new box, the pitman arm has a stud, where as the old pitman arm has a hole to hook the box to the drag link. I used a piece of a drag link that came from a Chevy truck that had a hole in it, the hole has to fit the stud on the pitman arm. The steering link that came off, I cut that in half and treaded the the Ford piece and the Chev piece togather using left and right treads and a turnbuckel off a tie rod end, got from the tie rod end off the Chev. Thet way the length is ajustable. Sence I had the drag link off that links the wheels togather on my truck, I cut off the nonreplaceable tie rod end and treaded a new new and turnbuckel. Now I don't have to replace the whole thing when the end goes bad again. You do not have to do that for this conversion.
4. I used a P/S pump off a 75 F100 Ford truck. The P/S lines that came from the Toyota, you will need to cut the pressure line fitting off at the pump end and replace it with a SAE fitting that fits the Ford pump.
I mounted the cooling loop with the horn on the drivers side.
5. I had to cut the steering shaft @ 3" and welded the end back on. Have someone that is a GOOD welder do this. The input shaft on the Toyota is smaller, so when you put in coupler on, I cut the slit on the clamp that holds the steering shaft to the coupling and tighten the clamp down.
6. I used a pully off a 64 Galaxie, I just had one, but when you pull a pump off at the wrecking yard get the P/S pully off the crankshaft.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Allen Dendy, e-mail is abertha2@juno.com
__________________
Allen D
1966 F-100 4x4 with 390 GT engine
1990 Areostar 2wd XLT ext
1980 Bronco with 460
1964 Galaxie 500 with 428
Oregon Chapter Member: To join the Oregon Chapter, click HERE
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:18 PM
buckarooranch's Avatar
buckarooranch buckarooranch is offline
New User
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Spangle, WA
Posts: 23
buckarooranch is starting off with a positive reputation.
Bertha66,

I sent you a short email.

Thanks!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 11-03-2009, 01:37 PM
bertha66's Avatar
bertha66 bertha66 is offline
Posting Guru
1966 Ford F-100
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 2,466
bertha66 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by buckarooranch View Post
Bertha66,

I sent you a short email.

Thanks!!!!!
Got it. You are in Eastern Wa., if you come down into Central Or. let me know and I can show you the truck.
__________________
Allen D
1966 F-100 4x4 with 390 GT engine
1990 Areostar 2wd XLT ext
1980 Bronco with 460
1964 Galaxie 500 with 428
Oregon Chapter Member: To join the Oregon Chapter, click HERE
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2009, 12:34 AM
frty7ford's Avatar
frty7ford frty7ford is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 515
frty7ford is starting off with a positive reputation.
the gear vendors overdrive is still an option. they make a divorced unit that you could mount but you would have to figure out a way to make it so that the overdrive is locked out when in 4x4. they will not recommend it due to the damage it could cause if used in 4x4. I have had a 302 powered 1972 f100 it had lots of power and got all of 13 mpg. my 1965 f250 with a 325 hp 390 gets 12 if i keep my foot out of it.
__________________
Jim
Elko, Nevada
1965 F100 240 I6 3speed overdrive
1965 F250 390/auto Camper Special
1947 1T flathead 8/4Speed
1977 F250 460/autoS/C Trailer Special
1976 F250 460/auto Camper Special
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1966 , 1977 , 2wd , 390 , 4x4 , 66 , 68 , cheapest , f100 , f250 , ford , lower , nv4500 , pups , swb , truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.