Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Engine Swaps
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2009, 03:02 AM
C.W C.W is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Penticton BC Canada
Posts: 58
C.W is starting off with a positive reputation.
5.0L to 5.8L in 91 f150 4x4

I know its a common topic.......................
My 91 f150 4x4 has a tired (310000kms) with the E4OD and bw1356 t-case (manual t-case if it matters)
Its time for a swap, I have a good running 351w low milage rebuild but its an earlier carbed one. I think i now have all the brackets and intake for the efi conversion on it.
Im wondering if the older one will produce the same power as a true efi 351 or is it lacking due to cyl head and cam technology at the time?
Also do i definately need to swap computers?
If so does it have to be from a 351 E4OD combo to run the trans and does 4wd make a difference?

Any info is greatly appreciated, Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2009, 09:03 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is online now
Post Fiend
1990 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 9,542
Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE.
Is your truck mass air? If so you don't need a 351 computer and you probably don't need to worry about the cam.. though if it's a stock grind cam the motor will benefit greatly from an upgrade.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's to 3" single, FRPP Mass Air Conversion
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, 1.6 RR, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors, TweecerRT, Innovate LC-1 wideband O2
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, and now power steering!!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2009, 12:46 PM
C.W C.W is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Penticton BC Canada
Posts: 58
C.W is starting off with a positive reputation.
It is not mass air.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2009, 01:43 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is online now
Post Fiend
1990 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 9,542
Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE.
Then you will need a 5.8/E4OD computer and you'll have to make sure the cam is an SD EFI friendly grind, doesn't have to be a stock cam, just one with at least 114deg LSA and relatively short intake duration(under 215deg@0.050"). The cams in my sig qualify as do the stock F4TE grind and the 5.0HO cam as well.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's to 3" single, FRPP Mass Air Conversion
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, 1.6 RR, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors, TweecerRT, Innovate LC-1 wideband O2
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, and now power steering!!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2009, 07:50 PM
C.W C.W is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Penticton BC Canada
Posts: 58
C.W is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ok. thanks.

Why does the 5.0L computer not work?
Is it the firing order difference?
I was told the 5.0ho works fine so i dont understand the difference with swapping a 351 in. Is there something else different?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2009, 05:49 AM
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006 EPNCSU2006 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 8,141
EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE. EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE. EPNCSU2006 has a good reputation on FTE.
The additional 49 cubic inches is the primary reason. For equal manifold pressures on a 302 and a 351, the 351 requires more fuel. This additional amount of fuel is likely outside the adjustment range of a speed density 302 computer. A speed density 351 computer will plug right in to a speed density 302 wiring harness, so it isn't anything major to swap.
__________________
Eric

'87 F150 302 manual 4sp overdrive 4x2
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2009, 10:50 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is online now
Post Fiend
1990 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 9,542
Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE.
There is a firing order difference between the motors but that doesn't matter on the SD system because the injectors are fired in groups of 4 and they are wired in the same groups for both engines. A 5.8 would run on a 5.0 computer but it would have issues on cold start and when the system is operating open loop(accelerating), because the computer tables are bases on 5 liters of displacement. Over time the computer will learn what it takes to run the 5.8 in closed loop so it will operate more smoothly as time passes, but it may run out of adjustment range at some points in the maps and that could lead to detonation problems and codes that won't go away.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's to 3" single, FRPP Mass Air Conversion
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, 1.6 RR, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors, TweecerRT, Innovate LC-1 wideband O2
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, and now power steering!!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2009, 05:14 PM
C.W C.W is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Penticton BC Canada
Posts: 58
C.W is starting off with a positive reputation.
This is all very helpful info. Thanks guys.
This is the first time i have spent this much time on my own ford. i am normally a GM guy but i bought this as a daily driver that i could run trails with and now its gotten way beyond what i had intended, mainly because it has taken all the abuse i have thrown at it over the last 10 months. All my other 4x4's were breaking with less abuse.
So i want to keep this one going, but for some reason im having a hell of a time finding the proper computer for this swap around here.
Thats why i was hoping it would run with the 302 cpu.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2009, 12:16 PM
loudfords's Avatar
loudfords loudfords is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Beachville, Ontario
Posts: 3,074
loudfords is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. loudfords is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
but it would have issues on cold start ... detonation problems ....
I ran an 88 351 in my 87 F150 on a 302 computer for a long time. Never had any cold start problems. Never had any issues with lean or detonation either. It ran rich, if anything. I think the 351 had bigger injectors than the 302?
__________________
Chad - loudfords

1979 F150 351W
2001 Focus
Ford LT75 lawn tractor
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2009, 12:39 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is online now
Post Fiend
1990 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 9,542
Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by loudfords View Post
I ran an 88 351 in my 87 F150 on a 302 computer for a long time.
Yes I believe that, especially if the motor was stock. Both use the same 19lb(orange) injectors BTW.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's to 3" single, FRPP Mass Air Conversion
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, 1.6 RR, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors, TweecerRT, Innovate LC-1 wideband O2
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, and now power steering!!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2009, 12:41 PM
C.W C.W is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Penticton BC Canada
Posts: 58
C.W is starting off with a positive reputation.
So if i am just putting a stock 351w in i should be ok?

My 351w was originally a carbed motor that i got the efi stuff for if it makes a difference.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2009, 04:40 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is online now
Post Fiend
1990 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 9,542
Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE. Conanski has a great reputation on FTE.
Stock means it has a stock EFI camshaft or one that is very close, the typical cam installed in a carb motor is not EFI friendly.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's to 3" single, FRPP Mass Air Conversion
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, 1.6 RR, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors, TweecerRT, Innovate LC-1 wideband O2
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, and now power steering!!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2009, 08:47 AM
pud pud is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta
Posts: 1,937
pud is starting off with a positive reputation.
Penticton! come join the BC chapter CW. Im from Kelowna origionally (ok well winfield, errr lake country), hows the weather down there?
__________________
2004 Focus zts (60 miles a day round trip to work, stuff it)
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2009, 07:37 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns Kemicalburns is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,537
Kemicalburns has a good reputation on FTE. Kemicalburns has a good reputation on FTE.
also be sure to get a 5.8/e4od flexplate. do not install the 302 flexplate on that 5.8 motor.

Loudfords, your system ran rich because the 302 computer was trying to compensate for the added cubes.

also know that your 302 Y pipe will not match up to the manifolds on the 5.8. the 5.8 is wider. finding a y pipe for the setup you plan to run shouldnt be hard at a wrecking yard.
__________________
94 XLT 5.8/E4OD
6"ProComp Stage II 35x12.5x15 BFG MT's ,
4.88 gears f/r
JBA shorty, Custom Y pipe,3" exhaust
Warn HS9500I

installing soon: Edelbrock efi truck intake, aussie locker front/rear

http://www.supermotors.org/registry/...il.php?id=4158
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2009, 09:50 PM
C.W C.W is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Penticton BC Canada
Posts: 58
C.W is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kemicalburns View Post
also be sure to get a 5.8/e4od flexplate. do not install the 302 flexplate on that 5.8 motor.

Loudfords, your system ran rich because the 302 computer was trying to compensate for the added cubes.

also know that your 302 Y pipe will not match up to the manifolds on the 5.8. the 5.8 is wider. finding a y pipe for the setup you plan to run shouldnt be hard at a wrecking yard.
Will the 5.8/c6 flexplate work on the e4od?
Are they balanced different?
Im aware of the exhaust issue, was gonna run duals.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.