Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 4 Cylinder Engines
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 05:26 PM
mattri mattri is offline
Elder User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 732
mattri is starting off with a positive reputation.
2.3 vs 4.0

Just curious about the strangths/ weaknesses of both motors, power, dependability mileage etc. Posted this in the 6cyl page as well, Matt.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2009, 09:46 AM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
1968 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 11,673
TigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputationTigerDan has a superb reputation
Just off the top of my head...

2.3: Solid, dependable, easy (and fairly cheap) to get parts for, good fuel mileage capabilties, respectable power for its size (unless saddled with an automatic) and excellent hop-up potential. Main weakness that I can think of is a tendancy to break cam followers.

4.0: Many of the above strengths apply, mileage isn't quite as good as the 2.3 (duh!) but can still be in the low 20s in a light truck with a 5-speed. Not many hop-up parts available and have a tendancy to crack heads when overheated (though not as bad as the 2.9 V6).

Anybody else want to add your thoughts?
__________________
"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2009, 12:38 PM
FarmForward's Avatar
FarmForward FarmForward is offline
Postmaster
2005 Ford F-350
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Star-Club, Hamburg
Posts: 3,518
FarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud ofFarmForward has much to be proud of
Farm Forward
Never had a truck with the 4.0, but my current daily driver Ranger has a 2.3. It has no performance upgrades, but makes decent power for what I use it for (mainly as a highway runner, but it also does some light hauling). My truck had some minor troubles that were'nt related to the engine itself (electronics and ignition), but after addressing those it has been very reliable. Started when the temps fell to -15 degrees, and has been on day-long trips in 100 degrees. Mileage is consistently around 23-25 mpg, which is the reason I bought this truck, but I have'nt been disappointed by any aspect of it, really. I'm sure that the 4.0 also has its high points, and hope that somebody who has experiences with that engine will post here to give you another side of the story. I looked at Rangers with the 4.0 when I bought my 2.3 version, but after deciding what I would be using the truck for 90% of the time, the 2.3 became the best choice. In the end, I think, that's what it will come down to in most cases.
__________________
The American Farmer Feeds The World

FarmForward
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2009, 06:48 PM
clunker86 clunker86 is offline
Senior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 462
clunker86 is starting off with a positive reputation.
how much can an 86 2.3 5spd ranger haul or pull. i just bought one with the idea of later down the road swapping a 4.0 and 4x4 in it. plan on buying a junt explore for donar. but for now i was going to put this 2.3 to the test. i know having the 5spd tranny to be the biggest plus here.
what r ur ideas
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2009, 08:07 AM
FordRiotStarter1992's Avatar
FordRiotStarter1992 FordRiotStarter1992 is offline
New User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: oxford O.H.
Posts: 23
FordRiotStarter1992 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i have an 85 2.3 5spd 4x4 ranger, i can never get it stuck and provided the engine is in good running order it can pull quite a bit if you drive it right but one problem i am having with it at the moment is that it is missing, bad it is only running on two cylinders. i will let you know what the problem is when i get it fixed
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2009, 08:36 PM
akc71 akc71 is offline
New User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
akc71 is starting off with a positive reputation.
2.3 is very dependable. I have a 93 extended cab 2 wheel drive with 248,000 + miles, nothing to the engine, 1 alt. , 2 serpentine belts, 3 timing belts( luckily its a non interference engine), fixing to need a starter, 2 clutches( you can try to back too much weight( a Trailer load of block up a hill at 173,000). other than that nothing. Have an 1990 Aerostar with a 4.0 auto. Great little van 198,000. has an odd miss at idle but runs great. I used it for a delivery van for a while. They will crack the heads though
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2009, 02:01 PM
Ford_Six's Avatar
Ford_Six Ford_Six is offline
Super Moderator
1969 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington
Posts: 16,016
Ford_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputationFord_Six has a superb reputation
I've got a 2.3 in an 81 Courier, and it's been holding up decently. Starting to burn a bit of oil, but I've been making 200mile trips hauling 750-1000lbs at 65+ with a 4.10 rear end.
It's coming out in favor of a small diesel in a few months, about when I'm also converting the truck to a 4x4.
__________________
Jared
Real trucks have the key on the left
FTE Guidelines
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 02:01 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 4 Cylinder Engines

Tags
1992, 23, 23vs, 29, 40, 40ford, engine, engines, ford, motor, motors, ranger, reliability, tolerances, vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.



 
vbulletin Admin Backup