What do you think of the 4.6L?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-17-2009, 06:22 AM
6CylBill's Avatar
6CylBill
6CylBill is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks everyone, I appreciate the comments.

Sounds to me like the 4.6L is more than enough as a baseline engine taking over the 4.2L.
 
  #17  
Old 01-17-2009, 11:14 PM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the 3 vavle 4.6's numbers. We'll be test driving Explorers with it in them and I think it will be fine in an F150.

But I've never really thought the 2 valve 4.6 was all that. It's reliable, but doesn't get much better if any MPG in the F150 vs the 5.4 for the power hit.

I'm hoping that the 2 valve being put in the 09s is only being put there to run out stocks of the 2 valve 4.6.

Mike
 
  #18  
Old 01-18-2009, 01:14 PM
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Johnny Langton is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BLK94F150

I'm hoping that the 2 valve being put in the 09s is only being put there to run out stocks of the 2 valve 4.6.

Mike
Not gonna happen anytime soon.
With the tooling and other major assembly structure in place and the cost to build being much less than the 3V,the 2V will be the base engine. You must keep in mind that a large percentage of F150 sales are fleet work trucks,and simplicity for maintanance and cost are king there. the 4.6L 2V wins this hands down. Plus, it's a proven engine that's been in production since '92 in one form or another.
JL
 
  #19  
Old 01-18-2009, 08:50 PM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems like shutting down the 2 valve would be a great place to cut costs. IDK but 2 4.6s makes no sense to me. Simplify the product line.

Oh well, I'm still hoping the 6.2 makes it to the new F150 so I might totally be in left field.

Mike
 
  #20  
Old 01-24-2009, 09:33 PM
Garden Spyder's Avatar
Garden Spyder
Garden Spyder is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Manhattan Kansas
Posts: 17,496
Received 53 Likes on 51 Posts
I have a 4.6 in the Aviator, and although it isn't tough directly off the line, it will definately hold you back in your seat once the launch has been produced. I use it to pull my camper, and it doesn't back down from a challenge, however I think that the 4.6 that is in it, is a 305 hp 4 valve per cylinder. (at least according to the sales sheet)
 
  #21  
Old 01-29-2009, 04:58 PM
mtcrss14's Avatar
mtcrss14
mtcrss14 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i will have to say i own a 2000 f-150 4.6 whether its 2 or 3v idk but i do know its a guttless pig and terrible on gas. and now having a bunch of coil problems with it. but thas not why i hate it though. it just has no ***** at all. any little hill it has to downshift and scream. And its been that way since i got it with 40,000 miles on it, now it has 103,000
 
  #22  
Old 01-29-2009, 05:17 PM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mtcrss14
i will have to say i own a 2000 f-150 4.6 whether its 2 or 3v idk but i do know its a guttless pig and terrible on gas. and now having a bunch of coil problems with it. but thas not why i hate it though. it just has no ***** at all. any little hill it has to downshift and scream. And its been that way since i got it with 40,000 miles on it, now it has 103,000
Do you know what gears you have?

I will say that we have 2 valve 4.6 Crown Vic Police Interceptors at work, and I'm pretty confident that my truck in my sig would walk away from them. Overall I'm not impressed with the 2 valve 4.6.

Mike
 
  #23  
Old 01-29-2009, 06:17 PM
Johnny Langton's Avatar
Johnny Langton
Johnny Langton is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by mtcrss14
i will have to say i own a 2000 f-150 4.6 whether its 2 or 3v idk but i do know its a guttless pig and terrible on gas. and now having a bunch of coil problems with it. but thas not why i hate it though. it just has no ***** at all. any little hill it has to downshift and scream. And its been that way since i got it with 40,000 miles on it, now it has 103,000
You've got a 2V.
JL
 
  #24  
Old 01-29-2009, 08:45 PM
mtcrss14's Avatar
mtcrss14
mtcrss14 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no im not sure what gears i have but i know they are pretty high. i mean going down a flat highway its fine but i live in upstate ny and theres nothing flat about it so it is constantly downshifting. i have pulled some pretty heavy stuff with it and it will pull it but it is always screaming. i get about 11 mpg mixed
 
  #25  
Old 01-30-2009, 08:49 AM
wiscvanman's Avatar
wiscvanman
wiscvanman is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: racine wisc
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mtcrss14,

i have had the same downshifting with my tranny when loaded. mostly with the cruise engaged. taking the cruise off and uing the downward momentum to get up the next hill i find less down shifting. try that for a while.

the coil packs i am told are usually good for 100k and then need to be replaced. mine started to fail over 200k. replacing them at 100k should just be considered as normal pm. nothing runs forever and you got 60k from them under your ownership. change now and enjoy the entire next 100k. i understand they can be purchased online for 70 bucks. replace all that have not been done then replace them all next time.

happy motoring.!!
 
  #26  
Old 01-30-2009, 03:37 PM
mtcrss14's Avatar
mtcrss14
mtcrss14 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea i know nothing lasts forever i am just saying i dont think the 4.6 is that great and really think its a waste of money. just put the 5.4 in all the vehicles. just my .02 cents
 
  #27  
Old 01-30-2009, 08:12 PM
blue2golf's Avatar
blue2golf
blue2golf is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 183
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99 F-150 XL 2WD 4.6 here. Just commute to work and occasional light duty use (dirt, mulch, appliances, whatever....) 143,000 miles and still going with a little oil burning on cold morning start ups. If the oil burning gets too bad, I'll have it rebuilt and go another 200,000 miles. Been a damn fine truck.

4.6 is real good for running the races to and from work. Plenty of power when you need to pass that butthead that cut you off a mile back.
 
  #28  
Old 02-02-2009, 02:12 PM
Big Bad's Avatar
Big Bad
Big Bad is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Johnny Langton
Not gonna happen anytime soon.
With the tooling and other major assembly structure in place and the cost to build being much less than the 3V,the 2V will be the base engine.
JL
The 4.6 2V will die with the Crown Vic, to be replaced by a N/A Cyclone V6 (3.5/3.7) in the F150.
Both the 4.6 3V and the 5.4 3V will be phased out in favor of the EcoBoost 3.5 and the new 5.0 4V (which only loosely based on the Modular with DAMBs and slightly wider bore spacing).

The Modulars are on their way out, I'm sorry to say.
 
  #29  
Old 02-04-2009, 02:18 PM
HarleyFXDL's Avatar
HarleyFXDL
HarleyFXDL is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A friend had the 4.6 in a 2002 F-150. We went to N.Carolina to buy a 68 Camaro and flat towed it back. Every incline we hit the engine was screaming. He had, I believe, the 3:73's. The engine was fine under normal conditions, nothing scary. Put a load on it though and you felt it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bob1987f
2004 - 2008 F150
23
05-05-2021 03:31 PM
makuloco2000
2004 - 2008 F150
6
09-07-2015 04:23 PM
BassFantasizer
Modular V8 (4.6L, 5.4L)
3
04-04-2015 07:49 AM
Zenkem
2004 - 2008 F150
5
09-03-2009 08:40 AM
ContinentalBreakfast
Ford vs The Competition
56
02-12-2005 01:44 AM



Quick Reply: What do you think of the 4.6L?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.