Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2011 F100
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

2011 F100 Discussing the much rumored mid-sized 2011 F100






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 12-05-2008, 08:23 PM
greenmachinejohn greenmachinejohn is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 126
greenmachinejohn is starting off with a positive reputation.
ford is shipping in some trucks made in another country. Its unknow as of right now but who wouldnt want the raptor, Its comes just as you see no options on cab size or box size. The truck comes in red or black. The red has a gold flake. The truck will have a 6.2L V-8 in 2011.
__________________
1968 F-100(Plain Jane)
  • 360 V-8 ----> Now 396 V-8
  • 2bl carb----> Now 4bl Carb and intake
  • 390 crank and rods
  • Headers
  • Floor shift Conversion
Worn Out Tools
A Club Just for fun!
Brooklyn, Mi
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 12:23 AM
Oggie's Avatar
Oggie Oggie is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Taylorsville, KY
Posts: 48
Oggie is starting off with a positive reputation.
Talking

Well, this is a most interesting thread. One of the reasons I'm personally hung up on towing capacity is that I actually need it. If I could get a smaller truck with a reasonable tow limit, I could actually own a smaller truck that would be a little more affordable to drive and be able to use a trailer to haul my water tank instead of having to leave it on the truck all the time. And yeah, I would love to see an extended cab with an actual 8 ft bed. Again.

I would also like to see them keep the option list rather short. Gas or diesel. v6 orv8. 4wd with manual hubs or 2wd. Extended cab or standard cab with a very short options list. Short or long bed. 6 speed manual or automatic (with a deep 1st gear to get it moving). And maybe 3 sets of gearing options for the axles.

I would just hate to see this one hijacked by the yuppies like the rest of the truck market.

but, what do I know. I'm just a half crazed, diesel sniffing, freight relocation technician.
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 12:38 AM
Jason Lewis's Avatar
Jason Lewis Jason Lewis is offline
Elder User
1996 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cedar Park,Texas
Posts: 719
Jason Lewis is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Id rather see a new Lightning

Yea its a good time to come out with a SVT Truck with a big motor when Ford's sales are down

I still want a SVT Focus for a daily driver.
__________________
1996 F-150 Lightning Clone Look in My gallery
"Pushrod all the way"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp4c_fCu3FI
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 10:34 AM
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD BURNSTOUGHFORD is online now
Posting Guru
1994 Ford F-150
My Garage
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,430
BURNSTOUGHFORD is starting off with a positive reputation.
I disagree with the lightning, it isnt a huge money maker. Ford needs to build what will sell right now. Recapture sales that are going to toyota and nissan.
__________________
99' F-150 Super Cab Step Side
5.4l/4R70W (previously a 4.6l romeo)
CAI,Flowmaster 50 series dual exhaust,Gryphon Tuner with custom tunes (300 bhp est)
900LB AAL, cranked front Torsion Bars =(2in lift)Lariat LE Seats, Alpine cd player/6x9 speakers
2003 Fx4 Rims, 255/75/17 BFG MT KM
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 12:49 PM
Jason Lewis's Avatar
Jason Lewis Jason Lewis is offline
Elder User
1996 Ford F-150
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cedar Park,Texas
Posts: 719
Jason Lewis is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BURNSTOUGHFORD View Post
I disagree with the lightning, it isnt a huge money maker. Ford needs to build what will sell right now. Recapture sales that are going to toyota and nissan.
I don't think Ford should come out with one yet ether thats my point, also i don't see the Recapure even if it does come to production to see the show rooms for a few years.


Remember when ford was going to come out with the 2004 Gen 3 L but insted svt spent all there money on the Ford GT.
__________________
1996 F-150 Lightning Clone Look in My gallery
"Pushrod all the way"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp4c_fCu3FI
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 01:40 PM
tjthegreat tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 707
tjthegreat is starting off with a positive reputation.
ford must be pretty stupid.that raptor looks like a joke,i dont understand what they dont get,why would anyone buy that truck,im sure it looks pretty bling,but i can tell u of a few people who would rather get from point a to point b in a cheaper more efficient truck...just my .02
__________________
92 F-150 300I6/M5OD/3.08/64k
77 F-150 302/V8/3.55/224k
88 Chevy2500/350/4.11/179k
98 F-150 4.6/3.55/112k(sold)
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 08:20 PM
dwrestle's Avatar
dwrestle dwrestle is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 330
dwrestle is starting off with a positive reputation.
People like the 300 because of it's simplicity, reliability, power, and decent gas mileage for the vehicles it was put in. I'm not one to say the 4.6 sucks or the 5.4 sucks, because they are awesome, but to say they are better than a 300 or the 302(which I would agree on that one), well I guess it's just an opinion. It's hard to compare them. The 300 could have been much more powerful than it was, and could be much more powerful today with all the cool fuel injection, and computer contols they have now the 300(and any old engine really) would be a great engine even right now. Most Ford people love that engine for a reason, and you won't be able to convince them otherwise. I'm not a big 302 fan but the HP(capability), and reliability for that engine is pretty awesome. Not knocking the 4.6 or 5.4, but a modern day 300 would mop the floor with the 4.6 when it comes to doing any thing a truck was meant to do. Just my opinion.
__________________
1983 Ford F-150, Reg Cab, 300 six, probably 3.55's Black with red pinstripes.

Old Ford Rides: 06 F-150 XLT, Supercab, 4x4, 5.4, 3.73's, Treador Red(Awesome). 1994 F-150, XL, Supercab, 4x4, 5.8(with cam), 3.55's, Black(Awesome).
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 09:30 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 4,802
dkf has a good reputation on FTE. dkf has a good reputation on FTE. dkf has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwrestle View Post
Not knocking the 4.6 or 5.4, but a modern day 300 would mop the floor with the 4.6 when it comes to doing any thing a truck was meant to do.
Not going to happen. I just don't know why people think the 300 is such a powerhouse. It has decent low end torque and is a stout design, but thats about it. Don't get me wrong, I like the older pushrod motors but stock to stock the modulars have them beat hands down.
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 11:43 PM
BURNSTOUGHFORD's Avatar
BURNSTOUGHFORD BURNSTOUGHFORD is online now
Posting Guru
1994 Ford F-150
My Garage
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,430
BURNSTOUGHFORD is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf View Post
Not going to happen. I just don't know why people think the 300 is such a powerhouse. It has decent low end torque and is a stout design, but thats about it. Don't get me wrong, I like the older pushrod motors but stock to stock the modulars have them beat hands down.
Exactly, i loved the older motors, but the newer ones have them coverd in every department. minus the extreme low end grunt of the 300. But pullig a trailer down the highway, I had both engines and my 4.6l towed a 5500 lbs trailer at 75mph easily, slow getting there but no problems. My 300 had a har enough time cruising at 75 empty let alone draging another 5500 lbs.

I loved the 302 but in a equally equpied 97-03 with a 4.6l the 4.6l is better in every way and has to haul another 500lbs while doing it.

Any ways Back on topic, im the OP and i think that we need to go back to what you want to see on the new F-100 if it comes out, realistic or not keep them coming. Lets not turn this to an argument about our own engines when it should be our engines vs the compitions.

Thanks
__________________
99' F-150 Super Cab Step Side
5.4l/4R70W (previously a 4.6l romeo)
CAI,Flowmaster 50 series dual exhaust,Gryphon Tuner with custom tunes (300 bhp est)
900LB AAL, cranked front Torsion Bars =(2in lift)Lariat LE Seats, Alpine cd player/6x9 speakers
2003 Fx4 Rims, 255/75/17 BFG MT KM
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2008, 11:49 PM
greenmachinejohn greenmachinejohn is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 126
greenmachinejohn is starting off with a positive reputation.
The only new ford motor is the "Hurricane" 6.2L V-8
__________________
1968 F-100(Plain Jane)
  • 360 V-8 ----> Now 396 V-8
  • 2bl carb----> Now 4bl Carb and intake
  • 390 crank and rods
  • Headers
  • Floor shift Conversion
Worn Out Tools
A Club Just for fun!
Brooklyn, Mi
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2008, 02:24 AM
dwrestle's Avatar
dwrestle dwrestle is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 330
dwrestle is starting off with a positive reputation.
Vent wing windows should be on the smokers option, because there are so many people who love those, and I'm sure the comercial would say "introducing the new Ford F-100, the only truck that with available vent wing windows, because we know what you want in a truck."
__________________
1983 Ford F-150, Reg Cab, 300 six, probably 3.55's Black with red pinstripes.

Old Ford Rides: 06 F-150 XLT, Supercab, 4x4, 5.4, 3.73's, Treador Red(Awesome). 1994 F-150, XL, Supercab, 4x4, 5.8(with cam), 3.55's, Black(Awesome).
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 12-13-2008, 03:19 PM
strombley strombley is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
strombley is starting off with a positive reputation.
Diesel

Would be nice if the put in a small diesel that got decent milage.
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 12-13-2008, 06:42 PM
Ed_B Ed_B is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 352
Ed_B is starting off with a positive reputation.
How about a turbo-diesel version of the old 300 six?
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 12-13-2008, 09:14 PM
wendell borror wendell borror is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,126
wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE. wendell borror has a great reputation on FTE.
The new ford raptor is an off road lighting put out by SVT. It will ahve a 400 hp 6.2. Also ford is working on a fusion GT with a 340 hp ecco force 3.5. They are also working on another performance focus. With ford's one car for all market stradegy, we will be seeing alot of european stuff comming this way in the future. Ford will save alot of money by making the same car for all markets, instaed of individual cars for different markets and should benifit us here in the states greatly.
__________________
2009 FORD RANGER fx4 off/road, 5-speed manual, torson diff and rancho's!

2008 mercury mariner 4x4 V-6, automatic.

1987 jeep wrangler, 258, 5-speed
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 12-13-2008, 10:05 PM
rolande's Avatar
rolande rolande is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9
rolande is starting off with a positive reputation.
I absolutley agree. Bring back the 300/6!! An f100 with a 300/6, 4x4 option and axle options up to 3.73. would sell. If guys want a V8 then offer a 302 and 351. I would also like to see a real standard transmission not a mazda truck tranny in a full size (no idea what ford was thinking!) Ford would also benefit if they kept the truck simple and clean and only offer XL , and XLT trim levels. This is Ford's chance to win back its loyal clients and gain distance on GM and Chrysler.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
20x14 , f100 , quarter , ton

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.