Flathead design question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-21-2021, 07:03 AM
bobcat1156's Avatar
bobcat1156
bobcat1156 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flathead design question

Hi! I'm new to the forum as you can see. Great forum here. There is a question about flathead engines that I have always wondered about. Why have none(to my knowledge) ever been built with valves on both sides of the cylinder bank? A double side valve so to speak. That is, with a straight 4,6,8 there would be two in-block gear driven cams, one on each side, actuating two intake and two exhaust valves per cylinder. With V-type engines 3 cams could be utilized (one intake cam and two exhaust cams). Intuitively it seems as though this could double intake and exhaust flow. Thus improving flathead performance vs a SSV configuration.

Thanks in advance,

Bob
 

Last edited by bobcat1156; 07-21-2021 at 07:30 AM.
  #2  
Old 07-21-2021, 03:29 PM
f5fordgirl's Avatar
f5fordgirl
f5fordgirl is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 94 Posts
The flathead was heavy enough as it was, imagen the extra bulk and weight with that setup, would have to had rail road car springs in the front.
 
  #3  
Old 07-21-2021, 05:32 PM
bobcat1156's Avatar
bobcat1156
bobcat1156 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by f5fordgirl
The flathead was heavy enough as it was, imagen the extra bulk and weight with that setup, would have to had rail road car springs in the front.
Thanks for the reply. I'm thinking more current time. Using alloy blocks and heads. Extra cam, valvetrain, and some extra alloy in the block wouldn't amount to more than 25 lbs.

Chevy 327 V8 weight - 575 lbs
Ford Flathead V8 weight- 569 lbs
 

Last edited by bobcat1156; 07-22-2021 at 06:01 AM. Reason: added data
  #4  
Old 07-23-2021, 07:15 AM
EffieTrucker's Avatar
EffieTrucker
EffieTrucker is offline
Phantom of the Phorum

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Eastern Kentucky
Posts: 4,750
Received 859 Likes on 458 Posts
First, welcome to FTE!

What you describe sounds close to a "T" head engine.



While your idea is interesting, it would feed such a niche market I'm not sure it would be economically feasible. There have been attempts to cast new "stock" flathead blocks, but it looks like the interest/money just wasn't there to sustain it. A custom multiple cam block would be even more expensive and most likely only attract the salt flat runners and drag strip racers. That's a pretty small group.

I think the bottom line is....well...the bottom line.
 
  #5  
Old 07-23-2021, 03:21 PM
bobcat1156's Avatar
bobcat1156
bobcat1156 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks! That would be it. I knew it had to have been thought of. By the look of the drawing I'd say 1920's (no counterbalanced crank). Yeah my design would be an X-head. I was going to design in a raised X in the top of the pistons to give more"squish" on the compression stroke. Two spark plugs per cylinder to even out ignition of the charge. I'll keep dreaming.

Bob
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yomow
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
02-27-2006 07:53 PM
Polkat
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
12-04-2005 02:32 AM
73GreenF250
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
9
08-29-2004 11:02 AM
jwtaylor
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
36
12-23-2003 09:15 AM
e william
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
5
06-17-2003 07:07 AM



Quick Reply: Flathead design question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.