1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Tires; Thin vs. Fat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-15-2008, 12:23 PM
skoveng's Avatar
skoveng
skoveng is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Tires; Thin vs. Fat

Did a search and could not find this topic.

I'm getting ready for new skins; I either going with 235/85R16 or 285/75R16.

My driving is 95% highway, I'm here in the Phila. area so we get snow but not like the old days so I'm thinking of a good M/S.

Do you guys perfer the bigger fatter or the taller thinner tires, why?

Thanks for any input.

Steve
 
  #2  
Old 10-15-2008, 12:55 PM
BillyBob69's Avatar
BillyBob69
BillyBob69 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wheatland, Mo
Posts: 7,333
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
I like the looks of the 285-75-16...But prefer the OEM size...265-70-16 for snow traction. I have found that the wider the tire, the more it packs the snow instead of cutting it.

Ummmm Are you sure of the 235 measurement? That seems too narrow.
 
  #3  
Old 10-15-2008, 01:01 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
My truck came with 235/85R16s from factory and I have 285/75R16s on now. Theres no comparing the two IMO. I have far better traction in all conditions with the 285s including snow. My 285s are more aggressive than the 235s were but..... Never going back to 235/85s or 265/75s.
 
  #4  
Old 10-15-2008, 01:05 PM
skoveng's Avatar
skoveng
skoveng is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My F250 originally can with the 235/85R16's. I moved to 265/75R16 which are now bologna skins.

My truck is a 6.0, CC, LB 4X4
 
  #5  
Old 10-15-2008, 01:05 PM
BillyBob69's Avatar
BillyBob69
BillyBob69 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wheatland, Mo
Posts: 7,333
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Hmmm interesting....I thought the 265 were the OEM size. Oh well....
JMO
 
  #6  
Old 10-15-2008, 01:15 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyBob69
Hmmm interesting....I thought the 265 were the OEM size. Oh well....
JMO
There were different tires options. If you got the optional A/T OWL tires you got 265/75R16 if you got the standard BSW tires they were usually 235/85R16s. Both the 235s and 265s have almost identical diameters because of the aspect ratio. I believe duallys usually came with 235s also.

My dads 99' and his 03' both came with the 265 firestone steeltexs because he got the optional OWL A/T tires. My dad was a happy camper when he got rid of the steeltexs on both trucks and went to 285 BF A/Ts, those steeltexs were horrible tires traction wise. My 04' came with the standard BSW 235s.
 
  #7  
Old 10-15-2008, 02:52 PM
skunk250's Avatar
skunk250
skunk250 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have had 325's (13.5") with my 07 CC 250 and I am very impressed with the traction in the snow. I have heard some make the argument that thinner tires are better in the snow but from my personal expierience with highway driving, I feel very comfortable with the wider tires in white stuff. Braking sucks in the snow any way you look at it but I am sure that your tire type will also affect the performance in adverse weather conditions.
 
  #8  
Old 10-15-2008, 03:24 PM
jim henderson's Avatar
jim henderson
jim henderson is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
A lot of factors go into a tire's snow performance. Width is just one factor.

Also important are big open blocks of tread to throw off snow and prevent packing.

Rubber compound designed to flex in snow and throw off snow.

Siping, small cuts in tread to give rubber many edges to grab on ice.

Maybe bubbles in the rubber to cat like mini suction cups. Blizzaks and maybe a couple others have these.

I probably missed a few of these, since 1) I have lived most of my life in southern Calif. 2) I am not a tire expert.

I did live for about 14 years in Oregon and my experience is that it is more important how you drive, but your tires do make a difference. I had an Impala SS with big fat tires, got along fine in snow, ice was tricky, even my blizzaks were marginal.

Studded tires work well in ice, so so in snow and are terrible on dry or wet clear pavement.

Chains are good when all else fails but good for only a few hundred miles before they drive you crazy or snap a link.

My F250 with skinny tires and 4x4 is OK in most snow, not good on ice. I even towed my 30 foot travel trailer in snowy mountains at low speed just fine, even when others in 4x4 and no trailer, stopped driving.

OH, back to reasons... 3) I am not too bright.

In general I would say narrow tires work better for me on snow and ice(Barely). I can get around fine on fat tires if I drive carefully. Hard dry COLD ice is easy to drive on. It is the sloppy just wet snow or ice that is dangerous.

Jim Henderson
 
  #9  
Old 10-15-2008, 04:28 PM
cartmanea's Avatar
cartmanea
cartmanea is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 6,757
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Stockers are 235/85/16 or 265/75/16 depending on the trim package. I would go with the latter or a 285/75/16 since the 235s look way too small.
 
  #10  
Old 10-15-2008, 04:58 PM
Ace!'s Avatar
Ace!
Ace! is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So Oregon
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Taller, thinner, everyday and for almost all occassions.
 
  #11  
Old 10-15-2008, 05:26 PM
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
Carl Lassiter
Carl Lassiter is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I like 275s on SRW Super Duty's for all occassions. 235 andd 285 are two extremes so you could split the difference
 
  #12  
Old 10-15-2008, 05:31 PM
Fair 96's Avatar
Fair 96
Fair 96 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ace!
Taller, thinner, everyday and for almost all occassions.
Lived in Northern Canada for 20 years and agree totally with Ace..
 
  #13  
Old 10-15-2008, 06:43 PM
sonneborn3's Avatar
sonneborn3
sonneborn3 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville, IL
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fatter the better! JMO
 
  #14  
Old 10-15-2008, 06:51 PM
Ace!'s Avatar
Ace!
Ace! is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So Oregon
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by sonneborn3
The fatter the better! JMO
We're still talking tires, right?
 
  #15  
Old 10-15-2008, 06:57 PM
cartmanea's Avatar
cartmanea
cartmanea is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 6,757
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by sonneborn3
The fatter the better! JMO
Not on snow and ice! I have 35x12.50 tires now, I think my next set will be 285/75/18 which is about a 35x11.50
 


Quick Reply: New Tires; Thin vs. Fat



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.