Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Super Duty/Heavy Duty > Super Duty & Heavy Duty
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Super Duty & Heavy Duty 1999 to current Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines SPONSORED BY:




 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2008, 09:50 PM
quarterhorseman quarterhorseman is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bonnyville
Posts: 26
quarterhorseman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Gas mileage 1999+ F250/350 5.4 L engines

I was wondering how many MPG these trucks get, I currently have an 88 F350 SC 460 Dually 5spd, I get about 10-12 MPG on the highway unloaded, I only have 152,000km, is it worth upgrading to a newer truck, Im looking at a 2000 F350 reg cab 4x2 Dually 5.4l gas, which would cost me money (12-14k)and possibly the same gas mileage? But im also considering let hassle of 20 yr old parts wearing out or deteriorating.... which if i buy a newer truck i can at least know it will still be around for another 5-10 years without worrying down the highway...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:12 PM
dumans24 dumans24 is offline
New User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 21
dumans24 is starting off with a positive reputation.
This doesn't answer your question directly, but as a point of reference, my 1997 F250HD 5.8L gets 14 mpg around town, maybe 17 highway.

Good Luck.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:41 PM
quarterhorseman quarterhorseman is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bonnyville
Posts: 26
quarterhorseman is starting off with a positive reputation.
I just recently got rid of my 95 F250 HD 5.8 4x4 only got 10mpg on the highway in the city didnt matter, towing i got 7 or 8..
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:42 PM
larmon's Avatar
larmon larmon is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 42
larmon is starting off with a positive reputation.
I drive a 2006 E350 van with the 5.4 and I'm averaging 15mpg with mostly highway driving.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:51 PM
shore shore is offline
Senior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Deforest
Posts: 215
shore is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ive got a 2002 v10 f250 superduty 4x4 with 3.73 gears. I get around 13 miles per gallon on the highway. I never haul anything heavy though.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 02:32 AM
twags6's Avatar
twags6 twags6 is offline
PAA Member #7 and FTE
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Laurys Station, PA
Posts: 2,724
twags6 has a very good reputation on FTE.twags6 has a very good reputation on FTE.twags6 has a very good reputation on FTE.twags6 has a very good reputation on FTE.
If you plan on towing anything on the larger side, I'd go for a V10 or diesel. The 5.4's are ok, but are a bit undersized to move a 7000lb truck towing a bigger trailer.
__________________
Trevor
01 F-350 CC 8ft bed SRW 7.3L a/t. 190k
PAA Member #7
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 04:48 AM
orng1's Avatar
orng1 orng1 is offline
Postmaster
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paramount, Ca
Posts: 4,039
orng1 has a very good reputation on FTE.orng1 has a very good reputation on FTE.orng1 has a very good reputation on FTE.
I get about 13-14mpg average on my 2000 F250SD regular cab 5.4L 4x2, it does have over 200k miles and I never drive without the A/C on.
__________________
00 F250 5.4L K&N stock box folter, 257k miles.
01 F250 7.3L DP Tuner, Airaid intake, Magnaflow 4" turbo back, 88k miles. Bob

<img src="<a href=http://api.photoshop.com/home_e202e8e80efb4a1696c4980e2d094cf5/adobe-px-assets/c71a8ac8ad5f4072a1981a2a389f6f04 target=_blank>http://api.photoshop.com/home_e202e8...981a2a389f6f04</a>" width="450" height="150"/>
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 08:04 AM
stevenn1's Avatar
stevenn1 stevenn1 is offline
Senior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: KS
Posts: 400
stevenn1 is starting off with a positive reputation.
'06 F-250 5.4L (3-valve), 5-speed auto, supercab, longbed, 4x4, 33" all-terrain tires, 3.73:1 gears, K&N air filter. Small load (people + gear in bed = 800 lbs) with cruise control at 70 mph = exactly 12.5 mpg. This is when i had only 10k miles on it. Plenty of pulling power for me.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 01:12 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Post Fiend
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 8,925
dkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to behold
The 5.4l SD should get better mpg than your 88'. However it will not pay to spend the $$$$ on the newer truck. You can buy a lot of parts, fuel and etc for the ole 88' and the 88' will be cheaper to repair to boot than the SD. I can get all the parts I need for my 74' F-100 so I highly doubt there will be problems getting parts for your 88'. I wouldn't buy a SD with the 5.4l unless it was a Reg cab SRW, shurely wouldn't get a 5.4l dually SD. The truck your looking at should at least have 4:30s with the 5.4l, if not forget about it or regear it. My $.02
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2008, 02:28 PM
quarterhorseman quarterhorseman is offline
Freshman User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bonnyville
Posts: 26
quarterhorseman is starting off with a positive reputation.
The max i want to pull is 9500 lbs, 7000lb gooseneck, and 1-2 horses, reason I like duallys is because everything is more stable when hauling, I have 3.55s on my 88, it came with 4.10 stock but they were swapped by the previous owner to get better gas mileage, the only problem is I dont know whether to put money into my current truck or buy a newer one that isnt gonna rust out for 10 years, as mine is just starting to show minimal rust,
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2008, 08:03 AM
onefastmfn71 onefastmfn71 is offline
New User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5
onefastmfn71 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I just bought a 2008 F-350 long bed, extended cab, 4x4, 5.4, automatic, 4:10 limited slip, single rear wheel. It's getting 12 to 13 around town and 14+ on the highway with cruise set at 75mph. Mileage was hand calculated and the computer is giving similar results. Engine is still fairly new and hopefully mileage will continue to improve after a few thousand miles.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2008, 08:06 AM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Post Fiend
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 8,925
dkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to beholddkf is a splendid one to behold
Duallys are more stable and I can understand why you prefer them. Your current 88' would pull much better with 4:10s. Rust can be repaired and prevented. New body panels can be gotten I wouldn't worry about rust. If your not pulling often or long distances the 5.4l w/4:30s will do the job. A 6.8l would do it better but still should have 4:30s or at least 4:10s. The 460 is a different animal when compared to to the 5.4l and 6.8l. Either prefers steeper gears for best performance. When towing the 5.4l and 6.8l will get identical mileage.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2008, 08:18 AM
onefastmfn71 onefastmfn71 is offline
New User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5
onefastmfn71 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I forgot to mention that I also own a 1993 F-250 SRW with the 460/auto/4:10 combo. DFK brought a up a good point about the difference between the 460 and 5.4 liter. My 460 makes most of its power in the lower RPM range while the 5.4 seems to start pulling harder as the RPM's increase.

I've had the opportunity to drive both trucks the same day for a direct comparison. I am very glad I got the 4:10's with my 2008 5.4. I don't think I would have liked this engine with the 3.73's.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-07-2008, 05:51 AM
browntown3's Avatar
browntown3 browntown3 is offline
Senior User
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East TN
Posts: 274
browntown3 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have an 02 F350 5.4 crew cab, 4x4 single rear wheel and get unloaded on the highway around 14mpg, in town pulling a 10 foot trailer its more like 10, oh by the way its got 4.10 gears.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 05:51 AM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Super Duty/Heavy Duty > Super Duty & Heavy Duty

Tags
1999, 350, 54, 54l, cab, engine, f250, ford, gas, hd, milage, mileage, model, regular, truck

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.



 
vbulletin Admin Backup