Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 and SOHC 4.0 V6
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2008, 08:48 PM
dazzleaj dazzleaj is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Richmond VA, USA
Posts: 40
dazzleaj is starting off with a positive reputation.
2.9 5 spd swap

I have a 89 2.9 with a dead 5spd available to me for a song. I have 2, 5 spds from rangers with 2.3L. One was from a 95 that was just rebuilt prior to my son in law rolling the truck and the other is out of an 84 (carbureted).

Is there any way to use either tranny or do I need to find one out of a 2.8/2.9?
__________________
69 Mach1 428CJ
84 4WD F150 300six Man OD
84 E150 351 4bl C6
84 Ranger 2wd 2.8 C3
86 Ranger 2wd 2.3 5 spd
89 Ranger 4wd 2.3 5 spd 3" lift
92 Explorer Sport (2dr) 5 spd
94 Mazda Navajo auto (Explorer Sport)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:24 PM
mrshorty mrshorty is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UT
Posts: 3,487
mrshorty is starting off with a positive reputation.
Do you know which 5 speeds came from the 2.3's? or what year the 2.3's are out of? The 2.9 and 2.3 use different bellhousing bolt patterns. I don't know about input shafts, but I do know you'll at least have to swap bellhousings. Along those lines, Since the late '80's, the 2.3 has had the M5OD behind it, and I've always had the impression that the M5OD uses an integral bellhousing. So that won't work at all.
__________________
'87 Bronco II XLT 4x4 & '92 Explorer XLT 4x4 & '98 Chev Suburban K1500 SLT 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:18 AM
dazzleaj dazzleaj is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Richmond VA, USA
Posts: 40
dazzleaj is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sorry, I guess I didn't make it clear. I have 2 manual 5 spd tranys. Both came out of trucks with 2.3/2.0L engines. One of the trucks was a 95 the other was an 84. I do not know if the the bolt patterns are even close or if there is a starter issue. I wonder if there is any kind of adapter plate available or if the shaft length is even close. I haven't seen any reference to anything other than the 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 compatibility.

Thanks
__________________
69 Mach1 428CJ
84 4WD F150 300six Man OD
84 E150 351 4bl C6
84 Ranger 2wd 2.8 C3
86 Ranger 2wd 2.3 5 spd
89 Ranger 4wd 2.3 5 spd 3" lift
92 Explorer Sport (2dr) 5 spd
94 Mazda Navajo auto (Explorer Sport)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 11:20 AM
mrshorty mrshorty is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UT
Posts: 3,487
mrshorty is starting off with a positive reputation.
The '95 transmission is almost certainly an M5. You could visually verify, but, as I noted above, I'm pretty sure the M5 has an integral bellhousing, so this transmission is almost certainly not usable for your purposes.

I don't know what transmission the '84 is (TK5??). The blown '89 transmission is probably an FM146, though there's a chance it's also an M5 (with a different bellhousing) or a TK5.

1st step in this is going to be positive identification of the transmissions (especially the '84 and '89 transmissions). Then, if the '84 transmission has a removeable bellhousing, locate a suitable 2.8/2.9/4.0 bellhousing for that transmission. Then determine if you need a new input shaft and/or clutch parts. Then put it together.
__________________
'87 Bronco II XLT 4x4 & '92 Explorer XLT 4x4 & '98 Chev Suburban K1500 SLT 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 07:35 PM
TigerDan's Avatar
TigerDan TigerDan is offline
Super Moderator
1968 Ford F-250
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The hills of No. Calif.
Posts: 9,983
TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of TigerDan has much to be proud of
Input shafts are indeed different between the 4-cylinder and the V6. You really need a V6-specific tranny whether it has an integral bellhousing or not.
__________________
FTE Moderator
Stop by and see us in the
Northern California Chapter!

"alot" is not a word...

Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2008, 08:49 PM
dazzleaj dazzleaj is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Richmond VA, USA
Posts: 40
dazzleaj is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks. I didn't think I could do it. I know a T5 has an available adapter plate to use it on a 2.8 2.9 4.0 but had never heard anything about the 2.3/2.0 tranny use on these.
__________________
69 Mach1 428CJ
84 4WD F150 300six Man OD
84 E150 351 4bl C6
84 Ranger 2wd 2.8 C3
86 Ranger 2wd 2.3 5 spd
89 Ranger 4wd 2.3 5 spd 3" lift
92 Explorer Sport (2dr) 5 spd
94 Mazda Navajo auto (Explorer Sport)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.