Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 07:50 PM
hatchet's Avatar
hatchet hatchet is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 439
hatchet is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question 5.8 mpg??

how many miles per gallon would a 96 f 250 4x4 get with a 5.8l..im sure its not good but i was wondering before i buy one as a work truck .thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 08:28 PM
tjthegreat tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
tjthegreat is starting off with a positive reputation.
buddies gets around 12-14,which aint real good,but the 302 aint much better and ford still hasnt managed 2 accomplish anything as far as mpgs go considering many 5.4s out there get worse mpgs than a 351 does
__________________
92 F-150 300I6/M5OD/3.08/64k
93 E-350/351w/106k
88 Chevy2500/350/4.11/179k
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 08:37 PM
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94 Blurry94 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calhoun GA
Posts: 2,984
Blurry94 has a very good reputation on FTE.Blurry94 has a very good reputation on FTE.Blurry94 has a very good reputation on FTE.
I checked mine here recently and got a little over 15mpg with my 5.8; supercharged, intercooled and 4:10 gears.
__________________
Matt C.
Supercharged, Intercooled, FAST XFI
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 10:26 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski Conanski is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 20,083
Conanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud ofConanski has much to be proud of
My 5.8 was getting about 13mpg combined cty/hwy but I drive it like I stole it most of the time.
__________________
Paul (Conan) O'Brien

1990 5.0HO AOD XLT X-Cab F150 3.55LS, 1994 3.0L 5-sp x-cab Ranger 3.45, 2004 3.0L 5-sp X-cab Ranger Edge 4.10, 2004 2.5L 5-spd Subaru Legacy
1996 Kawasaki ZX11D, 2004 Honda 599, 2008 Kawasaki KLR650
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 11:45 PM
hatchet's Avatar
hatchet hatchet is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 439
hatchet is starting off with a positive reputation.
so it sounds like the they get around 14 mpg average city yeah the one i was looking at has 4.10 hears with stocks tires.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 11:46 PM
hatchet's Avatar
hatchet hatchet is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 439
hatchet is starting off with a positive reputation.
are you kidding me the 5.4 get worse mpg than the 5.8?guess ill buy the 96 with the 5.8 and not the 99 with the 5.4l then.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2008, 10:27 AM
classicranger classicranger is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 190
classicranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
My 5.8 h.o. gets 9 mpg on highway. 4 or 5 in town. It's in a 78 f100 with c6 and 3.50 rear gears. I think it may be the holley sucking it all down but i need to something about it. The engine is from an 85 f150, if i knew it was going to be so bad on gas i wouldn't have bought it. Switched it over to a 2 barrel and it didn't help enough for the power loss.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2008, 12:33 PM
tjthegreat tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
tjthegreat is starting off with a positive reputation.
the 5.8 will be much easier 2 work on 2
__________________
92 F-150 300I6/M5OD/3.08/64k
93 E-350/351w/106k
88 Chevy2500/350/4.11/179k
Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2008, 12:33 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup