F150 with a 4-Banger?
#62
It's pretty clear that Ford ain't gonna be bringing back that old non-crossflow beast, but if they could do a more modern version of a simple motor with less camshafts, no turbos, and a lot of low end torque, I'm guessing they would end up with a lot less warranty claims than a 2.5 liter turbo four will generate...
I will remind you that the 300 inch six, in a 1978 F100, with 4 speed O/D trans, had actual EPA ratings of 19 city, 28 highway. Of course these are overblown, but it was still an awfully good MPG combination.
What was your solution again?
I will remind you that the 300 inch six, in a 1978 F100, with 4 speed O/D trans, had actual EPA ratings of 19 city, 28 highway. Of course these are overblown, but it was still an awfully good MPG combination.
What was your solution again?
#65
#66
Ever see the HP specs on a semi's diesel engine? Maybe 400 HP (but 1500 lb ft of torque), pulling maybe 70,000 lbs up hills.
#69
An I4 cummins work be great for the F-150, but it isn't going to happen anytime soon. Dodge has the cummins locked up in the US, maybe if Dodge goes belly up the cummins will be available, till then the cummins will stay in a truck that isn't worthy to carry it. IMO the EPA ruined new diesels back in 07' and 10' will only get worse. I think I can say I'll probably own a CNG powered vehicle before I'll ever own a diesel.
#70
HP is HP....I've explained this many times before. The reason my work truck pulls hills so well is NOT because it has a ton of torque, but because it has a very wide power band, and a 10 speed transmission to keep it there. My work truck pulls JUST AS HARD at 1200 RPMs as the 5.7L Toyota V8 does at 6,000 RPMs....
six of one, half a dozen of another....torque can be multiplied, divided, and otherwised manipulated to get the twisting force you want...but without RPMs, you have NO POWER....
you could have 1,000,000 lb-ft of torque, spinning at ONE RPM....and you have 190 HP...that's it....yes, that means that your million lb-ft of torque is working just as hard as my beat up, old Chevy Blazer 4.3L V6 will.
HP = (torque*power)/5252
My freightliner makes over 300 HP from 1200 RPMs....and it will pull peak HP at 1650 RPM all day long, day in, day out without a problem... THAT is what makes a great truck motor.
Torque is NOTHING without RPMS to match...
#71
Actually, yes, I have...I have a 2007 Freightliner Columbia with a Detroit Diesel series 60 motor, which has 450 HP @ 1650 RPMs, and 1650 lb-ft of torque at 1200 RPMs...
HP is HP....I've explained this many times before. The reason my work truck pulls hills so well is NOT because it has a ton of torque, but because it has a very wide power band, and a 10 speed transmission to keep it there. My work truck pulls JUST AS HARD at 1200 RPMs as the 5.7L Toyota V8 does at 6,000 RPMs....
six of one, half a dozen of another....torque can be multiplied, divided, and otherwised manipulated to get the twisting force you want...but without RPMs, you have NO POWER....
you could have 1,000,000 lb-ft of torque, spinning at ONE RPM....and you have 190 HP...that's it....yes, that means that your million lb-ft of torque is working just as hard as my beat up, old Chevy Blazer 4.3L V6 will.
HP = (torque*power)/5252
My freightliner makes over 300 HP from 1200 RPMs....and it will pull peak HP at 1650 RPM all day long, day in, day out without a problem... THAT is what makes a great truck motor.
Torque is NOTHING without RPMS to match...
And to un-hijack the thread, I still don't think a turbo on a 2.5 liter gasoline four cylinder engine, probably with 250 hp, would make a very good truck engine when compared to the 200 hp Cummins. Guess we'll have to see what the hp and torque curves look like on the Ecoboost engines, and the real world will test their durability when run hard.
#72
And to un-hijack the thread, I still don't think a turbo on a 2.5 liter gasoline four cylinder engine, probably with 250 hp, would make a very good truck engine when compared to the 200 hp Cummins. Guess we'll have to see what the hp and torque curves look like on the Ecoboost engines, and the real world will test their durability when run hard.
#73
i believe the 3.9 I4 cummins puts out around 130 hp and it puts out around 360 ilbs of torque,it is mostly used for industrial purposes,but its also in many vans and commercial vehicles,but im guessing cummins has the capability to increase hp output,im also sure ford could develop a good one 2
#74
Quote:////JUST AS HARD at 1200 RPMs as the 5.7L Toyota V8 does at 6,000 RPMs....
imo .....toyota trucks are overated..... its great to live here in ford country where you dont see guys driving toyota trucks, and when i do see one it is very rarley the 5.7 engine ... toyota will always be a contender when it comes to full size trucks and never the champ
imo .....toyota trucks are overated..... its great to live here in ford country where you dont see guys driving toyota trucks, and when i do see one it is very rarley the 5.7 engine ... toyota will always be a contender when it comes to full size trucks and never the champ
#75
I was just using the tundra motor as an example because of it's high HP rating, nothing else...
What I was getting at is that our current 5.4L V8 would pull a hill better than a 200 HP diesel would. Sure, it has lots of torque, but because it can't push that torque at higher RPMs, it can't pull as hard as our 5.4s would.
Sure, it would have an awesome low end, but compare it in almost every way to our current 5.4, it probably wouldn't sell, unless maybe it got great fuel economy, which is where I think diesels have their potential. I agree a 200 HP diesel would make a great pickup motor, but it would simply not satisfy those looking for a high HP motor, as it simply wouldn't pull as hard as the top end V8 everyone is offering.
Believe it or not, if you got the gearing right(CVT anyone?), our current 5.4L V8 could and would pull an 80,000 tractor trailer down the road, probably at over 60 mph, too...but probably with downright awful fuel economy.
When my work truck is loaded down to max gross weight, which is 80,000 lbs, I can get 7 MPG....my pickup truck towing an empty, 3,500 lb 24 foot enclosed car hauler only gets 9....
What I was getting at is that our current 5.4L V8 would pull a hill better than a 200 HP diesel would. Sure, it has lots of torque, but because it can't push that torque at higher RPMs, it can't pull as hard as our 5.4s would.
Sure, it would have an awesome low end, but compare it in almost every way to our current 5.4, it probably wouldn't sell, unless maybe it got great fuel economy, which is where I think diesels have their potential. I agree a 200 HP diesel would make a great pickup motor, but it would simply not satisfy those looking for a high HP motor, as it simply wouldn't pull as hard as the top end V8 everyone is offering.
Believe it or not, if you got the gearing right(CVT anyone?), our current 5.4L V8 could and would pull an 80,000 tractor trailer down the road, probably at over 60 mph, too...but probably with downright awful fuel economy.
When my work truck is loaded down to max gross weight, which is 80,000 lbs, I can get 7 MPG....my pickup truck towing an empty, 3,500 lb 24 foot enclosed car hauler only gets 9....