Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

F150 with a 4-Banger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #61  
Old 08-08-2008, 09:08 PM
irishammer's Avatar
irishammer
irishammer is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's an easy one the 300HP 5.4!!
 
  #62  
Old 08-08-2008, 09:15 PM
deanjet's Avatar
deanjet
deanjet is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by YoGeorge
It's pretty clear that Ford ain't gonna be bringing back that old non-crossflow beast, but if they could do a more modern version of a simple motor with less camshafts, no turbos, and a lot of low end torque, I'm guessing they would end up with a lot less warranty claims than a 2.5 liter turbo four will generate...

I will remind you that the 300 inch six, in a 1978 F100, with 4 speed O/D trans, had actual EPA ratings of 19 city, 28 highway. Of course these are overblown, but it was still an awfully good MPG combination.

What was your solution again?
Hey, I liked that old motor. You had enough room to almost get in the engine compartment and work on the motor!
 
  #63  
Old 08-08-2008, 11:29 PM
tjthegreat's Avatar
tjthegreat
tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
id take the 200 hp cummins,its a much better truck motor,but for what you need the 5.4 maybe suit you better
 
  #64  
Old 08-09-2008, 12:01 AM
Fosters's Avatar
Fosters
Fosters is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by irishammer
That's an easy one the 300HP 5.4!!
I agree... the 5.4 with 2 more cylinders in the front
 
  #65  
Old 08-09-2008, 11:33 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,424
Received 671 Likes on 440 Posts
Uh...tj...that 200 cummins may be a diesel, but it is STILL a 200 HP motor...

better for fuel economy, but as for pulling 8,000 lbs up a hill......lousy!!!
 
  #66  
Old 08-09-2008, 12:11 PM
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
YoGeorge is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,509
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy001
Uh...tj...that 200 cummins may be a diesel, but it is STILL a 200 HP motor...

better for fuel economy, but as for pulling 8,000 lbs up a hill......lousy!!!
Uh...Crazy001...that Cummins motor has over 400 lb ft of torque. Sounds fine for pulling 8,000 lbs to me...

Ever see the HP specs on a semi's diesel engine? Maybe 400 HP (but 1500 lb ft of torque), pulling maybe 70,000 lbs up hills.
 
  #67  
Old 08-09-2008, 01:54 PM
David85's Avatar
David85
David85 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
200Hp cummins. Hands down. If its still not enough power.....there is a fuel screw on them.....

I think the cummins 4cyl 3.9L would make an excellent full size truck motor. Oh wait, ford already offers that.
 
  #68  
Old 08-09-2008, 02:23 PM
tjthegreat's Avatar
tjthegreat
tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there are 18 wheelers out there that have 200 hp idk if it will pull 70k,but it will pull more than any gasser out there
 
  #69  
Old 08-09-2008, 06:45 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
An I4 cummins work be great for the F-150, but it isn't going to happen anytime soon. Dodge has the cummins locked up in the US, maybe if Dodge goes belly up the cummins will be available, till then the cummins will stay in a truck that isn't worthy to carry it. IMO the EPA ruined new diesels back in 07' and 10' will only get worse. I think I can say I'll probably own a CNG powered vehicle before I'll ever own a diesel.
 
  #70  
Old 08-09-2008, 09:20 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,424
Received 671 Likes on 440 Posts
Originally Posted by YoGeorge
Uh...Crazy001...that Cummins motor has over 400 lb ft of torque. Sounds fine for pulling 8,000 lbs to me...

Ever see the HP specs on a semi's diesel engine? Maybe 400 HP (but 1500 lb ft of torque), pulling maybe 70,000 lbs up hills.
Actually, yes, I have...I have a 2007 Freightliner Columbia with a Detroit Diesel series 60 motor, which has 450 HP @ 1650 RPMs, and 1650 lb-ft of torque at 1200 RPMs...

HP is HP....I've explained this many times before. The reason my work truck pulls hills so well is NOT because it has a ton of torque, but because it has a very wide power band, and a 10 speed transmission to keep it there. My work truck pulls JUST AS HARD at 1200 RPMs as the 5.7L Toyota V8 does at 6,000 RPMs....

six of one, half a dozen of another....torque can be multiplied, divided, and otherwised manipulated to get the twisting force you want...but without RPMs, you have NO POWER....

you could have 1,000,000 lb-ft of torque, spinning at ONE RPM....and you have 190 HP...that's it....yes, that means that your million lb-ft of torque is working just as hard as my beat up, old Chevy Blazer 4.3L V6 will.

HP = (torque*power)/5252

My freightliner makes over 300 HP from 1200 RPMs....and it will pull peak HP at 1650 RPM all day long, day in, day out without a problem... THAT is what makes a great truck motor.

Torque is NOTHING without RPMS to match...
 
  #71  
Old 08-09-2008, 09:49 PM
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
YoGeorge is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,509
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy001


Actually, yes, I have...I have a 2007 Freightliner Columbia with a Detroit Diesel series 60 motor, which has 450 HP @ 1650 RPMs, and 1650 lb-ft of torque at 1200 RPMs...

HP is HP....I've explained this many times before. The reason my work truck pulls hills so well is NOT because it has a ton of torque, but because it has a very wide power band, and a 10 speed transmission to keep it there. My work truck pulls JUST AS HARD at 1200 RPMs as the 5.7L Toyota V8 does at 6,000 RPMs....

six of one, half a dozen of another....torque can be multiplied, divided, and otherwised manipulated to get the twisting force you want...but without RPMs, you have NO POWER....

you could have 1,000,000 lb-ft of torque, spinning at ONE RPM....and you have 190 HP...that's it....yes, that means that your million lb-ft of torque is working just as hard as my beat up, old Chevy Blazer 4.3L V6 will.

HP = (torque*power)/5252

My freightliner makes over 300 HP from 1200 RPMs....and it will pull peak HP at 1650 RPM all day long, day in, day out without a problem... THAT is what makes a great truck motor.

Torque is NOTHING without RPMS to match...
Good stuff here and I'm with you...but I wouldn't call 1200-1650 RPM a "wide power band". I guess I'm not getting why your 450 hp will pull your Freightliner but yet you say that a 200 hp Cummins will have a problem with an 8000 lb load if you have a transmission that will put the engine near its power peak. I'm guessing the Cummins will also run close to its power peak all day long without melting down.

And to un-hijack the thread, I still don't think a turbo on a 2.5 liter gasoline four cylinder engine, probably with 250 hp, would make a very good truck engine when compared to the 200 hp Cummins. Guess we'll have to see what the hp and torque curves look like on the Ecoboost engines, and the real world will test their durability when run hard.
 
  #72  
Old 08-09-2008, 10:09 PM
Fosters's Avatar
Fosters
Fosters is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by YoGeorge
And to un-hijack the thread, I still don't think a turbo on a 2.5 liter gasoline four cylinder engine, probably with 250 hp, would make a very good truck engine when compared to the 200 hp Cummins. Guess we'll have to see what the hp and torque curves look like on the Ecoboost engines, and the real world will test their durability when run hard.
I doubt they're shooting for 250hp out of the 4 banger. that'd be way too close to the 4.6 2v motor. 200hp and 250tq would be very doable with a 2.5 liter, and it wouldn't need a whole lot of boost to do it... would be building boost relatively fast, at low rpm too, esp under load...
 
  #73  
Old 08-09-2008, 10:33 PM
tjthegreat's Avatar
tjthegreat
tjthegreat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Wayne IN
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i believe the 3.9 I4 cummins puts out around 130 hp and it puts out around 360 ilbs of torque,it is mostly used for industrial purposes,but its also in many vans and commercial vehicles,but im guessing cummins has the capability to increase hp output,im also sure ford could develop a good one 2
 
  #74  
Old 08-09-2008, 10:34 PM
B's FX4's Avatar
B's FX4
B's FX4 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mi
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:////JUST AS HARD at 1200 RPMs as the 5.7L Toyota V8 does at 6,000 RPMs....


imo .....toyota trucks are overated..... its great to live here in ford country where you dont see guys driving toyota trucks, and when i do see one it is very rarley the 5.7 engine ... toyota will always be a contender when it comes to full size trucks and never the champ
 
  #75  
Old 08-10-2008, 04:38 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,424
Received 671 Likes on 440 Posts
I was just using the tundra motor as an example because of it's high HP rating, nothing else...

What I was getting at is that our current 5.4L V8 would pull a hill better than a 200 HP diesel would. Sure, it has lots of torque, but because it can't push that torque at higher RPMs, it can't pull as hard as our 5.4s would.

Sure, it would have an awesome low end, but compare it in almost every way to our current 5.4, it probably wouldn't sell, unless maybe it got great fuel economy, which is where I think diesels have their potential. I agree a 200 HP diesel would make a great pickup motor, but it would simply not satisfy those looking for a high HP motor, as it simply wouldn't pull as hard as the top end V8 everyone is offering.

Believe it or not, if you got the gearing right(CVT anyone?), our current 5.4L V8 could and would pull an 80,000 tractor trailer down the road, probably at over 60 mph, too...but probably with downright awful fuel economy.

When my work truck is loaded down to max gross weight, which is 80,000 lbs, I can get 7 MPG....my pickup truck towing an empty, 3,500 lb 24 foot enclosed car hauler only gets 9....
 


Quick Reply: F150 with a 4-Banger?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 PM.