Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide and Water/Methanol Injection
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2008, 10:57 AM
kaboom10's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: royal oak, mich
Posts: 480
kaboom10 is starting off with a positive reputation.
2 small turbos instead of 1 big one.

I wondering if any one used 2 turbos rated for like a 2.2L engine. Should it be giving the same capacity of one turbo for a V8? I have a 5.4L so would a couple of small turbos work?
   
__________________
2002 F-150 5.4L 4wd
Amsoil filter element w/ mod air box
Baer rotors EGR Carbon Kevlar pads
Flowmaster
Kenwood
Optima battery
Livewire PRP tuned w/wideband O2
Modified 4R70 Trans(shift kit)
4.88 gears and Trutrac carrier
B.F.Goodrich Rugged Trail
Stab the throttle ain't got no bottle
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2008, 02:08 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,830
Lead Head is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Lead Head is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
if the turbos were in parallel, then yes two smaller ones would work, also give you quicker spool times.
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 03:42 PM
Freightrain's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,008
Freightrain is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
That seems to be the hot ticket anymore, at least for the street guys. Two small ones come up quicker then one big one. Less lag....more GO!
__________________
1967 F100 352/4spd
1969 F100 428CJ/4 spd
64 Galaxie with blown 390 4 spd
64 Galaxie wagon with 428 5 spd
2006 UMTR POWERSHIFT
POINTS CHAMPION

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 09:36 AM
frederic's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,569
frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.frederic has a great reputation on FTE.
Generally speaking a pair of smaller turbos will spool faster than one larger turbo, however it all depends on the sizing of the turbos. What one calls "small" versus another might not be the same yanno

Here is a useful "monkey math" formula I came up with years ago to help with acquiring junkyard turbos for other projects:

"Donor" is the vehicle you're leeching turbos from.
"Project" is your vehicle you're putting turbos on.
  • (donor displacement) x (donor redline) x (project QTY) = (project displacement) x (project redline) x (donor QTY)
  • 2.2l x 6200 x (project quantity) = 5.4L x 6500 x 1
  • 13640 x (project quantity) = 35100
  • (project quantity) = 35100 / 13640 = 2.573
As you can see you need approximately 2.573 Dodge Daytona turbos for your mightly 5.4L.

If you are "dead set" on using Dodge Daytona turbos you can use the same formula and evaluate "redline" on your 5.4L. Just because Ford lists this figure at 6500 doesn't obligated you to spin your crank that fast.

So, same thing...
  • (donor displacement) x (donor redline) x (project QTY) = (project displacement) x (project redline) x (donor QTY)
  • 2.2l x 6200 x 2 = 5.4L x (project redline) x 1
  • 27280 = 5.4L x (project redline)
  • (project redline) = 27280/5.4 = 5051.85 rpm
So to use a pair of seemingly undersized Dodge Daytona turbos on your 5.4L V8, you'd have to decide that your redline is now 5051.85 rpm - otherwise you'll overspeed the turbo's compressor and impeller wheels and risk frying the bearings.

Some notes about my "monkey math".
  1. It doesn't take into consideration compression ratio and assumes both vehicles are the same.
  2. It assumes the OEM (donor) turbo was sized appropriately for the car they put it on.

Considering the "factory" curves using a Lincoln Navigator Intake Manifold in place of the F-series truck manifold, I don't think a 5000 redline would be awful. HP and Torque are both very high according to this graph I stole from the web (Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords Magazine):



While horsepower continues to increase past the 5000 rpm redline, torque goes down, and ultimately that is the important thing to pay attention to.

Considering your truck's exhaust manifolds look like this... ... you have much room for improvement. A four-into-one tubular header that points directly up for the turbo to sit on is probably the best solution - and you may have to make this either by your own hands or pay a shop to make them.

I'm assuming you can cut and drill metal, but if you can weld you can make your own headers if you take your time and plan it out a bit. You can purchase "weld els" from a variety of sources in mild steel or stainless and make your header tubes that way, OR you can be like me and continue the "monkey theme" and use ordinary black pipe and hack that up into crude sections, welding that to steel plates for a turbo flange and the header plate. Plate can be purchased at most home centers as is black pipe - very common materials.

The first step is to create the turbo flange and collector - which is just a piece of 1/2" steel cut out to fit the flange of the turbo (use a turbo gasket as a template) then miter four short sections of black pipe to form the collector, then weld the snot out of it



Then, mount your cylinder head on a stand or rest it on the workbench, and make a simple "jig" to "float" the turbo flange/collector where you ultimately want it to be in relationship to the cylinder head - mine's made out of scrap I had laying on the garage floor - as long as it holds the flang/collector still it doesn't matter what you make it out of - flats, angle iron, metal rods, etc. My jig bolts to one of the head bolt holes on the cylinder head so I can move to two bolt #2 for the driver's side and bolt #3 for the passenger side, thus placing the turbos ahead of the throttle body. This was for an EFI 460 which has a big "gooseneck" type thing with a throttle body mounted on the front of it, directly in the center of the engine. Your 5.4L if I'm not mistaken, has the throttle body further back towards the firewall if I'm not mistaken. You can figure that out on your own though. Basically you want to place the turbos forward of the throttle body so you can minimize the tubing bends on the intake side. Some guys put their twin-turbos next to the accessories and/or in front of the engine, but that makes the exhaust and intake sides longer

Once the turbo flange/collector is "floating" in place, bolt your header place to your cylinder head:



Now that you have both ends of the turbo manifold in place, it's time to join them together. Again, you can use pre-made weld-els or if you don't mind crude hack up some black pipe, like I did:





Once complete, make another one for the other side, moving the jig so the headers end up being a mirrored image of each other.

Yes, they are ugly. But they will flow better than the stock log manifolds and put the turbos above the wheel wells just ahead of the throttle body which is where I want them. Weld-els or hydraulically bending pipes would have been cleaner, but for $100 and one trip to home depot, well, was just too easy

Here's the whole article I wrote about this:
DIY Turbo Manifolds

So there you go, some "monkey math" and some "monkey turbo headers".
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 04:59 PM
kaboom10's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: royal oak, mich
Posts: 480
kaboom10 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanx every one. It gives me a lot of food for thought. Plumbing would be the only thing since it's not a kit install. There's tons of inexpensive turbos out there sized for an engine half mine's size.

I sent away for some books on the subject. I'm not going into this blind.

Last edited by kaboom10 : 07-18-2008 at 05:16 PM. Reason: added text
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-06-2008, 12:17 AM
9.ford.5's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 395
9.ford.5 is starting off with a positive reputation.
if you find a turbo with the right turbine A/R it will spool just as fast as two turbos
__________________
daily driver/future, project mud truck
----------------------------------------------------
1995 ford f-onefitty, 300 I6, M5OD, 31x10.5 procomp m/t (they suck BAD), warn premium locking hubs...(it WAS blue)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-06-2008, 12:32 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 283
2000BLK54 is starting off with a positive reputation.
5.4L w/ auto tranmission...all you need is a Garrett 67mm turbo with a .81 AR hotside. It will get going at just 1900 rpms at WOT and is more than capable of blowing a stock engine and transmission. Simple and cheaper than two turbos too. Oh, and flipping the stock exhaust manifolds is a good way to go. They are not a restriction to a turbo until you are well past 600 hp and Hellion has proven that log manifolds are usually good until you are in the 800hp range.



I hate that whole "lag" BS too with single turbo builds. Not a person here could feel the 0.6 seconds of "lag" a 76mm turbo has on one of these engines. A smaller 67mm? Non-existent.
__________________
2000 F-150
SuperCab 5.4L, Flareside
S&B, Flowmaster SI/DO, T. Perfomance Dual Electric Fan Kit, ATI ProCharger P-1SC (12 psi), Snow Methanol injection, Jet-Hot full length headers, offroad exhaust

www.cardomain.com/id/2000blk54
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.