You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!
I have an 88 f150 supercab, 5.0 & 5speed 4wd. since i got it in february i have steadily increased the mileage from 13 to about 16 avg. here a while back i grabbed a mass air flow sensor off a 94 e150 of my dads, and while 90 percent of its 330,000 miles were all highway it consistenly got 19-20 mpg. i was planning on putting the mass air onto my 88, but before i buy a computer and start rewiring, is it really gonna make a difference? im trying to be realistic and am not expecting it to get 20 mpg if i do, but 1 or 1.5 would be nice, anything over about .75 would make it worth it. any opinions or suggestions?
since i have bought the truck i have cleaned the k&n, changed the oil in engine and tranny, replaced the horrible u joints (), set tire pressures the the rated max of 45, covered the bed with a tarp (poor mans tonnue cover) shift religiously at 2000rpm and try not to go over 65 mph.
1973 f250 highboy 4x4 http://thelostdrifter.com/index.php/...ducing-trigger1984 full size bronco, -DIS, wide band megasquirted 300/ 8 speed
1988 f150 extended cab 4x4, mostly stock.
1984 mercury capri, 5.0 conversion, my little monster...
1961 ford falcon, all stock, in family since '68
My mileage went down after converting to mass air, but there was an issue I never could track down. Others have reported increases, but I do not know a hard number as to how much it went up. Regardless of which system is running, I'm not sure that you'll be able to get much better than 20 from a 5.0.
My 94 5.0/E4OD/4x4 F-150 got about 12 city and 15 hwy with the sequential firing MAF system. Speed density, which is also bank firing may be inferior in theory, but unless you are into making mods, like a different cam, works just fine. I wouldnt bother. I think Ford upgraded the system for emissions reasons only, as the CNG engines still retained speed-density with bank-firing injectors.
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.