Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 02:47 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
sevensecondsuv is starting off with a positive reputation.
Will a ZF-5 tranny mate to a FE block?

I'm currently working out a budget for my next project which is a 80-86 F-350 4x4. I've pretty much decided I want some kind of stroker 390 in it. I know they never came from the factory with a ZF-5 trans but that would be my trans of choice. My buddy has one in a 87 F-350 with a built 521 stroker (460 based) and the trans has held up great. Plus I really like the low gearing of a ZF-5 combined with a nice overdrive to help gas mileage. If I can't mate a ZF-5 up to a 390 block I might start thinking about a different engine.
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 03:08 PM
Redmanbob's Avatar
Humble servant of my Peni
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Heavens cellar
Posts: 2,788
Redmanbob is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Hate to say it but I'd probably follow the same route as your bud, as it is known to work and the 460 will cost less to build I'd think.
__________________
66 F100 352 V8
"Po-Dunk Redkneck Transplant"
CRATE = Cant Really Appreciate The Engine..
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/619321-russ-east-vs-west-3.html
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:32 PM
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,965
85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.
Since you are at square one here, going 460 or even (gasp) a 400 would be the way to go, making the ZF a bolt on.

We had a long post about this a while back. The only one that makes sense (imo) is the NV4500 behind the FE. Heavier than the ZF, low first, OD 5th. Probably more $$ too.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2008, 09:36 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
sevensecondsuv is starting off with a positive reputation.
I didn't really want to use an NV4500. I've known too many guys that toasted those things in the Rams and Chevys. Besides that, it messes up the transfer case selection. I was hoping to use the Borg Warner since it's such a stout case and bolts up to the ZF.

I really didn't want to do a 460 either simply because I like to be different and my buddy already has that truck.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2008, 01:21 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 131
obey_your_master is starting off with a positive reputation.
A getrag G360 will bolt right up to an FE. You do have to machine the input shaft so that it will accept a FE clutch (shaft is too long). I don't know what this will do for transfercase selection, however. This might be a little over your budget however as parts for these trannies are expensive. My machinist did this to a 1966 F250 4x4. He installed a stroked 427 w/ 428 crank and so far it has held up fine. One advantage that he had in reguards to the transfercase was that it was a divorced setup. The transmission he used was out of a 2wd dodge and he made his own driveshaft from transmission output to transfercase input. Just an idea though...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2008, 01:53 AM
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,965
85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.
That NV 4500 weighs 200 lbs. Must all be in the case...

Read what these fellers have to say about the Getrag.....

Domestic Truck Tranny Guide

In the OP you said:

" If I can't mate a ZF-5 up to a 390 block I might start thinking about a different engine. "

Well, you aren't going to mate that ZF to a 390, you don't like the NV4500, & you want to be different..... Consider my suggestion on the 400. Peruse the 335 threads, you can get 400 horse and more out of those and use the ZF.

Or look here, you can probably get an FE scattershield drilled to fit one of these:

TTC: TREMEC Transmissions
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2008, 10:17 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
sevensecondsuv is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well after some research the NV4500 is looking better...

It's just that I've known 2 people that broke them while all the guys I've known with ZF's have yet to break one. But if everyone is saying the NV's are a little stronger than a ZF, I'd go for one. It sounds like I just buy two adapters, one for the bellhousing to trans and another for the trans to t-case and I can bolt it up to the FE block using a T-18 bellhousing and clutch and bolt the Borg-Warner case to the back of it. Then get the driveshaft lengths adjusted.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2008, 04:33 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 682
Dino@his Dad's is starting off with a positive reputation.
transmissions

7, have you looked at the Clark 280 series ? A heavy duty five speed manual that came behind the FT series in the bigger trucks. It is an easy fit behind a 390. Mine is a Clark 285V, geared like this, 6.99,4.09,2.24,1.46,1.00. There are other ratios available too. DinosaurFan, on work's old 'puter

Last edited by Dino@his Dad's : 07-04-2008 at 04:39 PM. Reason: spelling, once again, CRS
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2008, 06:12 PM
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,965
85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.
Where do you find a Clark 280 these days? I can't even find them on the internet. I know they're out there, but how deep in the scrap pile are they?

Check here for NV4500 swap info into Ford truck:

High Impact - NV4500 5spd


Note that this outfit also sells a gear splitter for use with your existing trans. You can look under "Overdrives & Underdrives" at the above site. Unlike some sites, it costs nothing to look....
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2008, 08:02 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
sevensecondsuv is starting off with a positive reputation.
The only existing transmissions I have now are 2 Mazda M5OD-R1s. One in the sploder and one in the turbo ranger.

The exploder one has 155,000 miles on it and I just now had to replace the factory clutch. It still shifts perfectly. I've beat on it hard pulling stuff and four wheeling.

The ranger one had 248,000 miles on it behind a 2.3 when I put a turbo 2.3 in front of it along with a centerforce dual friction clutch. Now it has 255,000 miles on it and it still shifts and drives fine, even being shifted hard and fast at 6000 RPMs.

I don't care what people say about the mazda trannies, I think they're great.

But I don't have any full size right now. I'm just trying to plan a budget for the build. I'll probably end up buying a truck with a 351 and C6 and rip both of them out. I think I'll stick with the NV over the clark simply because the NV is supposed to be more civilized. I'm a sucker for smooth sincros and tight shifting.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:22 AM
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,965
85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.
Sorry, I didn't recheck your posts and thought you had a T18 or T 19, both of which can be paired with the splitter. (as can other transmissions)

Again, your OP does say working on the budget. While shopping, you may find a 351/ZF combo or 351/E4OD.

Since the 351 will support a stroker crank as well, and is lighter (maybe 100 lbs or less, depending on how much pot metal you hang on the FE) than the FE, perhaps a 392 W would be an option.

So many truck/engine/transmission combos, so little money...............
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 10:54 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
sevensecondsuv is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yeah but there's just something about having a big block...

Besides that, I feel that the winsor and 385 series engines are done too much for my tastes. I like being different and thats how I settled on the FE.

My only goal for the engine is that it make 500 ft-lbs at or below 3000 RPM.

I was originally thinking about a 300 straight six. I wanted to have a custom 4.75" stroke crank made and add a 1" deck plate (to keep the rods long enough for a 4.75" stroke) and sleeve the cylinders at .100 over. That would have made a 376 cubic inch stroker straight six. However, that was going to get pricey quick and I'd still be SOL on a head that could flow enough to feed that many cubes in 6 cylinders. That's when the idea of an FE hit me.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 11:20 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 682
Dino@his Dad's is starting off with a positive reputation.
transmissions

Clarks are out there and easy to find, and usually cheap. I paid 250$ for all of my stuff. It came from an old F6 or 700 that was being cut up for scrap. Look at salvage yards and rebuilders who deal with the bigger trucks. Clark started building the 280 series in the mid sixties, and it is still manufactured under the Eaton name. If you didn't find any, you aren't looking in the right places. DinosaurFan, on work's old puter
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:24 PM
Hypoid's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 1,942
Hypoid is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dino@his Dad's View Post
Mine is a Clark 285V, geared like this, 6.99,4.09,2.24,1.46,1.00. There are other ratios available too. DinosaurFan, on work's old 'puter
So what is the benefit of running this 1:1 final over any other 1:1 tranny?

About the only benefit I'm seeing right now is that you can run highway gears in the axles, and still do some crawling in 4wd with that 6.99 low gear.
__________________
NO PRIDE-NO SHAME
'74 F-100 4x4: It's ugly, loud and smelly. Those are it's good points!

'96 Ranger XLT, 2.3L, 5-speed, 2 wheel drive.

Email me at Hypoids.haus at yahoo, visit me at RMFTC.com/forums
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:05 PM
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,965
85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.
With all due respect, a Clark out of an F6? An F 700? Did these trucks get driven gently around town, short shifted with light loads, left in a higher gear while the brakes did the work? Are not the shift throws something like a trip from Lima, Peru to Vancouver, BC?

For the OP, good luck with that project. Again, with all due respect, if you have the budget required for this kind of project, you can afford to pay for some advice from an engine builder vs. the free and apparently unsatisfactory advice posted here.

Happy Motoring!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.