Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Older, Classic and Antique Trucks > 1980 - 1986 F100, F150 And Larger F-Series Trucks
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

1980 - 1986 F100, F150 And Larger F-Series Trucks





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2008, 10:45 PM
doug1222556's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 826
doug1222556 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I just happened across this while browsing for parts : go to Summit and type this part # into the search box: G9063- a set of block huggers for under $100. Also, there are always shorties on ebay for cheap (at least on the starting bids), and if you follow several sooner than later one will sell for real cheap at the end of the auction.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2008, 11:12 PM
IcemanV8's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 439
IcemanV8 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Doug, thanks for pointing that out. Seems a better price. I'm not rich or wealthy. Well, look at my truck..

Anyways, I want the best I can get out of it on a low budget. I'm going with headers (I'll let ya'll know what), and hope you guys will give good advice on what size pipes and where to route.

Doug, again, I'd buy those in a heartbeat, BUT I want to know will they good (excellent sound) AND give performance on par with shorties? Or am I going to be disatisfied when I go to pull this 5000 pound trailer/car. I"ve done it once, but it gets weak unless I'm above 1800RPM. I'd like more down low grunt, but not just a little.

Cam will come in the future, but as for now, will those give me NOTICEABLY better torque and pulling power?

THANKS for pointing those out.

Tell me if you agree or disagree going for the mustang sound

Here is what I think a 5.0 is supposed to sound like. I know I may not have their e303 cam, BUT, teach me. What am I doing to sound like. I LOVE this 302 sound.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=DT8XPPXj0zQ

http://youtube.com/watch?v=FrzQidfuZCY


EDIT: This will be on a true dual set up with Flowmaster 40's (if I can see some that I like the sound to). It can't get louder than my cut off muffler and gutted cat. But, I know anything will sound better. We'll talk about that stuff later once I figure out headers. You guys are great because most people on here have heard many different set ups. I grew up in Chevy world... until I found out Ford is the better truck. They WILL last longer. Again, this truck is mine forever. Don't want something I regret on it.
And, the reason I want some good power from what I get is because I will keep this truck until it gets totaled from someone else head on collisioning me. If someone rear ends me... they have a heavy, heavy duty Road Warrier bumper to bump heads with. I spend some money for a magnaflow dual in/dual out for my 4.6 V8 94 Thunderbird, and a week later, I got head on collided.

POINT IS, I want something to stick with, because I love my truck. It's great, I love these Ford trucks. I don't want to put something on it that I only get 8 horsepower from.

Please, tell me what you know about those headers. And ease of changing plugs once they are on.
__________________
1986 Ford F-150 4x4 5.0 EFI
XLT Lariat
NP435/NP208/9" 3.50 axle
Road Warrior bumper, Leaf Spring Overloads, Custom Exhaust Work
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2008, 11:39 PM
doug1222556's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 826
doug1222556 is starting off with a positive reputation.
You really should google up "long tube vs. short tube header" and see the mustang mag article with dyno results for both for yourself. It's my belief (and quite a few others) that long tube headers are the best performance wise , but this dyno test points out that the difference is not as great as you might think. ie; if long tubes give you 30 more hp and 50 more torque, the shorties will be at 26 and 41., more or less. My daughter has the sound turned off on the comp right now so I'll have to hear that U-tube thing later. Those mustangs are probably sporting shorty headers BTW. I'm not real sure about the block huggers, but their probably OK. There are shorties for as little as $85 "buy it now " on ebay and tons more that will auction out for a lot less. I think you may be on the right track with a heat shield for the slave.. They also make sleeves to protect the line, and you should wrap your longtubes with header wrap anyway, IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 12:12 AM
HighdefJoe's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 121
HighdefJoe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Iceman, I can tell you for a fact that when I switched from BBK shorties to BBk longtubes on this engine(in the mustang), there was a big defference in low end power! Plus, the sound was louder but smoother, if that makes sense.... With my Trickflow cam, the sound is something like Eleanor from the movie! The truck should be the same because I plan to use long tubes, if I can, and Flowmaster 40's, with side exits.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 12:47 AM
IcemanV8's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 439
IcemanV8 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yes, when I want to do this. I want longtubes IF it's possible in my set up. I want them... I'm just more for them. I it's impossible as has been said, I'll go with shorties.
__________________
1986 Ford F-150 4x4 5.0 EFI
XLT Lariat
NP435/NP208/9" 3.50 axle
Road Warrior bumper, Leaf Spring Overloads, Custom Exhaust Work
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 12:49 AM
IcemanV8's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 439
IcemanV8 is starting off with a positive reputation.
And what about these sounds:


YouTube - 5.0 Revving up

YouTube - Flowmaster mustang

THAT, to me, is how I like a 5.0 to sound. Now, I know I have a truck, but I love the 302/5.0, and I love that particular distinct sound.

Will I be able to achieve a sound like that? I realize I'm a truck... but I love THAT 302 sound.

EDIT: And, yes, some may think it's stupid. Some may like that deep truck sound. I just absolutely LOVE the 302 sound. Sorry, to each their own, right guys? And if the sound is impossible, fine. What pipes and headers should I be looking for to let people know it's a 302. I can tell the difference between a Dodge Hemi, Nissan Titan, Ford 5.0 vs 4.6, and 350's and LS1's. If my truck can't sound like that, what's the next best thing.

I want a mean sounding exhaust. Flowmasters are blowmasters, but I don't have enough power to matter. Flowmaster and the 5.0 is a good sounding combo.
__________________
1986 Ford F-150 4x4 5.0 EFI
XLT Lariat
NP435/NP208/9" 3.50 axle
Road Warrior bumper, Leaf Spring Overloads, Custom Exhaust Work
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 09:06 AM
82F100SWB's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Sioux Lookout, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,269
82F100SWB is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
For headers for your truck, try Dynomax part #85054.
They should fit without issues.
__________________
86 F250 HD, 4x4/460/T19/44HD/10.25
82 F100/86 F350 4x4 460 with some goodies/T19 D60/welded 10.25/38.5 Boggers, mud racer/wheeling pig...
81 F100/86 F250 HD 4x4, 6.9/T19/D44 TTB junk/10.25. All smoke, no power, turbo no more...
And a couple Brand D's with early "C" power
It's not what you BUY, It's what you BUILD
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 01:05 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,842
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighdefJoe View Post
By the way, Conanski, are those Flowtechs the 12502flt number?
That's the right number for the 302 version, the ones in the pics are on a 351.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's, FRPP Mass Air, TweecerRT 282HP
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, Roller Rockers, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, sliding rear window.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 01:23 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,842
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by doug1222556 View Post
Not exactly- I said the long tubes only made about 5-9 points diff in the torque and horsepower and the shorties actually made more torque.
This might be the article referenced.. MAC Headers Test - 5.0 Mustang & Super Fords Magazine

The issue I have with saying the shorties made "more TQ" is that while it's technically true in this case it's not telling the whole story. The "more" comes above 3000rpm on this motor, and that's all but irrelevent to this thread.

What you also have to realize is that this test was done on a mustang with an aftermarket dual 2.5" exhaust system with no cats, this will flow sooooo much better than the stock truck exhaust it's not funny. This is very important because in this thread we are talking about comparing shorties that will get bolted up to the stock truck exhaust system and longtubes that will get all new plumbing behind them. It's really an unfair comparison, but it's also the reason why there will be such a hugh difference in the power produced by the two setups. From experience I can tell you longtubes will produce substantial TQ gains over stock right from idle up, they are easily worth the hastle IMO.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's, FRPP Mass Air, TweecerRT 282HP
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, Roller Rockers, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, sliding rear window.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 01:47 PM
HighdefJoe's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 121
HighdefJoe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Those Dynomax headers, 85054, are listed, again, for automatics only!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 06:57 PM
doug1222556's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 826
doug1222556 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I couldn't find a listing for longtube headers for standard transmissions at Summit. Jegs lists the Hedman 89350's and makes no mention of transmission. Summit so no on standard for same. I'm starting to wonder about the accuracy of the listings at Summit because it blows my mind that none of them fit and I've never seen a header listed by transmission anywhere else. I just googled up a set of Pacesetters for $201 from Alamo motorsports and again-no mention of transmission. Maybe you should go to Summit's customer service and ask about it or at Jegs.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 08:57 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17
1980f150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighdefJoe View Post
Those Dynomax headers, 85054, are listed, again, for automatics only!

dont know what differences it would make , the dynomax headers 85054 fit onto my 80 f150 4x4 5.0 .....it has the manual linkage for the clutch not the hydraulic setup



ps summit does list the same headers for a 86 2wd with the 5.0
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 09:41 PM
doug1222556's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 826
doug1222556 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1980f150 View Post



ps summit does list the same headers for a 86 2wd with the 5.0
By George- they do- and they list them as yes to manual trans. I don't know how I missed that! Also since my last post, I have found 2 or 3 listings that do specify auto only on ebay, so I guess Summit's application tables may be correct after all.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 11:04 PM
IcemanV8's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 439
IcemanV8 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski View Post
What you also have to realize is that this test was done on a mustang with an aftermarket dual 2.5" exhaust system with no cats, this will flow sooooo much better than the stock truck exhaust it's not funny. This is very important because in this thread we are talking about comparing shorties that will get bolted up to the stock truck exhaust system and longtubes that will get all new plumbing behind them. It's really an unfair comparison, but it's also the reason why there will be such a hugh difference in the power produced by the two setups. From experience I can tell you longtubes will produce substantial TQ gains over stock right from idle up, they are easily worth the hastle IMO.
Well, just so everyone knows.

When I decide on headers, they WILL be put on with true duals. I will be doing whatever it is I'm going to do before August. Just want what's best and what's going to work. But, yes, no cats/true duals are going in the set up, and probably coming out of Flowmaster 40's, maybe 44's. I just need to hear the best sound.
__________________
1986 Ford F-150 4x4 5.0 EFI
XLT Lariat
NP435/NP208/9" 3.50 axle
Road Warrior bumper, Leaf Spring Overloads, Custom Exhaust Work
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 11:17 PM
doug1222556's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 826
doug1222556 is starting off with a positive reputation.
ICEMANV8- did you see the last posts about the longtubes? That's the way to go. They're only like $150 as well. It's still a good idea to run the heat shield on the slave as well as the starter, and I would wrap them to keep underhood temps down as well. THEY FIT MANUALS-do a kittle happy dance!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.