Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
 
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Modular V10 (6.8l)
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 01:01 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 70
tesserra is starting off with a positive reputation.
Save gas.. fuel shut off while coasting...?

When I go down hill with the truck in gear and the engine holding back the truck speed, why can't the fuel be shut off.
The motor is being run by the transmission, so it doesn't need fuel to turn.
All the accesories should still work if the key is left on and there will be vacum for the power brakes because the motor is turning.
I just don't know how this could be done. Maybe a fuel pump shut off switch?
On a long grade like the Grapevine or coming from Tahoe I think this could save some gas with no real problems. When you want to start up again just turn the fuel back on and the motor is still turnig so it should start right up.
What do you guys think? Am I crazy?

George
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 01:52 PM
Monsta's Avatar
Sit. Stay. Become a
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Big Island of Hawai'i
Posts: 14,969
Monsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to all
I cannot comment on the mechanical side of doing something like that because it is too early in the morning for me to think properly. I can say that coasting downhill is when I use the least amount of fuel. It's when my Scan Gauge Instant MPG reading says 9999.

Not sure why I or anyone would want to go through the hassle of trying to save fuel during the engines most efficient time of using it.
__________________
Ken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
05V10


I love cats.
...but I can't eat a whole one.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:23 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Southeastern Michigan
Posts: 2,453
Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tesserra View Post
When I go down hill with the truck in gear and the engine holding back the truck speed, why can't the fuel be shut off.
It already does this. Electronic fuel injection systems have been doing this since the mid 1980's. They just don't fire the injectors, so no fuel goes into the engine.
__________________
Mark

Former Ford automatic transmission engineer, 1988-2007.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:24 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Southeastern Michigan
Posts: 2,453
Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monsta View Post
It's when my Scan Gauge Instant MPG reading says 9999.
It reads that high because the speedometer shows the Scan Gauge that you're moving, but there is no fuel going into the engine, so you get REALLY high fuel economy.
__________________
Mark

Former Ford automatic transmission engineer, 1988-2007.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 02:42 PM
keith w's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,237
keith w is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.keith w is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
9999? Really?

I don't think I have ever seen my Scanguage go above 50-something mpg in the F350, and never below .7gph. I've seen 175mpg in the Ranger when it drops to .2gph when coasting, but nothing close to 9999.
__________________
2004 F350 XL CC 4X4 V10 4.30LS purchased from Jeff Clark at Van Bortel Ford
Pics

2008 Ranger XL RC 2.3
Pics
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 04:04 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 70
tesserra is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky View Post
It already does this. Electronic fuel injection systems have been doing this since the mid 1980's. They just don't fire the injectors, so no fuel goes into the engine.

I guess thats why the automotive engineers make the big bucks !!

so it is better for gas usage to leave the truck in gear and when coasting down the hill rather than take it out of gear and let the engine idle.

George
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 09:34 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Southeastern Michigan
Posts: 2,453
Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.
Yes, you will use less fuel coasting in gear than in neutral.
__________________
Mark

Former Ford automatic transmission engineer, 1988-2007.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 10:04 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 222
rustyfuryiii is starting off with a positive reputation.
For a while there I played around with popping the stick to neutral when I was able to coast downhill and still maintain the legal (and then some) speed limit. I can say that with a stick you will save more fuel this way than leaving it in gear and coasting. I netted approx 1.5mpg better fuel economy this way over just leaving the stick in gear, the truck coasts far longer at far greater speeds than when I leave the gear engaged.

Problem was guessing what rpm I should be engaging which gear at what speed when I reached the bottom of the hill so as to not over rev or bog down the engine. In others words, was I saving money on fuel at the expense of the clutch and the timing chain/gears? While I got real good at guessing the correct rpm to have the engine spun up to for the appropriate gear at a given speed to reingage the trans, I stopped this practice as it was way too involved for the improvement I was getting in fuel economy vs the wear and tear I might've been putting my clutch through.

So I'm back to my old driving habits, and still getting the same old reliable 13.5mpg city/hwy combined mileage to/from work.

I can say that with my 4600lb Buick, I coast that puppy down every hill I can, leave it in gear, accelerate slowly when I can, and drive moderately and she still turns in 19.5mpg city/hwy combined mileage to/from work.

OK, I do nail it every now and then when ricers w/ fart pipes and whale tails rev up next to me at a light. Then it's ricer in the rear view, and 14mpg to go along with my grandpa woody wagon woopin up on 'em, ooops, thanks Detroit!

RustyFuryIII
__________________
'96 Buick Roadmaster Estate LTD/CE Station Wagon, 5.7L LT1 detuned Vette motor, 2.93:1 open rear, and factory 5000lb tow package

'06 F250XLT SD CC V10 6spd manual 4.10 LS, 8' box, 4X2
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008, 12:40 AM
Monsta's Avatar
Sit. Stay. Become a
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Big Island of Hawai'i
Posts: 14,969
Monsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to allMonsta is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by keith w View Post
9999? Really?

I don't think I have ever seen my Scanguage go above 50-something mpg in the F350, and never below .7gph. I've seen 175mpg in the Ranger when it drops to .2gph when coasting, but nothing close to 9999.
I'll be more than happy to snap a pic next time it shows it. Maybe it's because I have steep hills (volcanoes) here??

`````````````````

I had no idea that NO fuel was injected in the engine while coasting downhill! How does the engine know when I'm coasting downhill? How does the PCM know when to shut off the fuel injectors?
__________________
Ken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
05V10


I love cats.
...but I can't eat a whole one.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008, 09:56 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Montreal,Canada
Posts: 204
ZBIGBIG19TH is starting off with a positive reputation.
I agree with Monsta ,I see 9999 pretty often on my SCII.But was thinking of some kind
of malfunction.
Now that clears out the situation.
__________________
2002 Ex XLT V10
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008, 10:06 AM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Southeastern Michigan
Posts: 2,453
Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.Mark Kovalsky has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monsta View Post
How does the engine know when I'm coasting downhill? How does the PCM know when to shut off the fuel injectors?
It's done by calculating engine load. When the engine is at a relatively high RPM with a closed throttle the engine load is very low. The engine is not producing torque, it's being driven by the trans. The PCM can measure the engine load primarily from the air flow, RPM, and throttle position. When it detects this condition for a certain amount of time it shuts off the injectors.
__________________
Mark

Former Ford automatic transmission engineer, 1988-2007.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 10:44 AM
T18skyguy's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Springfield, OR
Posts: 642
T18skyguy is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Mark, I have a small RV,a 1995 460 with E40D, and I usually drop it into 3rd going down long hills so that I don't overheat and crack the rotors(which I have done before). Would that increase engine load and fuel consumption ?
__________________
I started out with nothing. I still have most of it left.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 12:09 PM
MisterCMK's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fargo, ND and Twin Cities
Posts: 6,615
MisterCMK is a splendid one to beholdMisterCMK is a splendid one to beholdMisterCMK is a splendid one to beholdMisterCMK is a splendid one to beholdMisterCMK is a splendid one to beholdMisterCMK is a splendid one to beholdMisterCMK is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustyfuryiii View Post
For a while there I played around with popping the stick to neutral when I was able to coast downhill and still maintain the legal (and then some) speed limit. I can say that with a stick you will save more fuel this way than leaving it in gear and coasting. I netted approx 1.5mpg better fuel economy this way over just leaving the stick in gear, the truck coasts far longer at far greater speeds than when I leave the gear engaged.

Problem was guessing what rpm I should be engaging which gear at what speed when I reached the bottom of the hill so as to not over rev or bog down the engine. In others words, was I saving money on fuel at the expense of the clutch and the timing chain/gears? While I got real good at guessing the correct rpm to have the engine spun up to for the appropriate gear at a given speed to reingage the trans, I stopped this practice as it was way too involved for the improvement I was getting in fuel economy vs the wear and tear I might've been putting my clutch through.

So I'm back to my old driving habits, and still getting the same old reliable 13.5mpg city/hwy combined mileage to/from work.

I can say that with my 4600lb Buick, I coast that puppy down every hill I can, leave it in gear, accelerate slowly when I can, and drive moderately and she still turns in 19.5mpg city/hwy combined mileage to/from work.

OK, I do nail it every now and then when ricers w/ fart pipes and whale tails rev up next to me at a light. Then it's ricer in the rear view, and 14mpg to go along with my grandpa woody wagon woopin up on 'em, ooops, thanks Detroit!

RustyFuryIII
Coasting down a hill in neutral must have made quick work of your brakes as well.
__________________
Chris
1994 Mustang GT
1992 Explorer XLT
2000 Expedition EB

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcbofade
I have no brain
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 02:31 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,144
dkf is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
[quote=Monsta;6174824]I cannot comment on the mechanical side of doing something like that because it is too early in the morning for me to think properly. I can say that coasting downhill is when I use the least amount of fuel. It's when my Scan Gauge Instant MPG reading says 9999.quote]

My scangauge does that too.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 02:36 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf dkf is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,144
dkf is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterCMK View Post
Coasting down a hill in neutral must have made quick work of your brakes as well.
Depends on the terrain and traffic. Many hills in my area have long flats at the bottom of the hill where you can coast for a long time and never touch the brakes. Its not worth it to me to pop it out of gear and coast at least with an auto tranny.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.