Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 08:29 PM
9299Fords's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Liberty, Idaho
Posts: 151
9299Fords is starting off with a positive reputation.
390 purchase questions

I'm looking at picking up a 1972 F250 for a parts donor for my 1950 F2. Beneath it's hood lies a 390. On checking out the spec.s for the different years, the 1972 looks pretty sad at 201 hp and 8.2:1 compression. '68 thru '71 show 255 hp and 8.6:1 CR. I've seen it posted in several places that the '72 FE heads were among the best performers. What did Ford do to drop the CR so low and squash the hp? Dish pistons?
   
__________________

1992 F150 4X4 351, 1999 F250 4X4 7.3L,
1984 Harley Davidson
Rejuvinating 1965 F250 Custom Cab w/1975 360 for Best Bud's wife.
(That 360 needs to go or become a 390)

Recently aquired 1950 F-2 (engine to be determined)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 09:19 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: southeren Oh
Posts: 144
80broncoman is starting off with a positive reputation.
The power might also be mcuh closer to same that the numbers show I belive the 71 numbers were gross HP ratings and the 72 were net.
Making a performance engine out of a truck engine is easy. Compression and cam timing were I belive the differences.
__________________
Real men don't wear Bowties
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 09:29 PM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 3,726
Bear 45/70 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Bear 45/70 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
It's true the numbers look low, but the power rating system changed. They no longer rated an engine with no accessories (gross power). After 1972 the engine were rated runing the water pump, alternator, air pumps and in some case the transmission. The real numbers are closer to the post 1972 rating.
__________________
Bear 45/70

Gimp Racing

Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he will just kill you.

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 09:41 PM
9299Fords's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Liberty, Idaho
Posts: 151
9299Fords is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for the info. I still wonder what they did to drop the CR from 8.6 to 8.2.
__________________

1992 F150 4X4 351, 1999 F250 4X4 7.3L,
1984 Harley Davidson
Rejuvinating 1965 F250 Custom Cab w/1975 360 for Best Bud's wife.
(That 360 needs to go or become a 390)

Recently aquired 1950 F-2 (engine to be determined)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 11:43 PM
Hypoid's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 1,781
Hypoid is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
A half point? Not sure, but others will know.

One thing Ford did to change CR was change piston pin height: Same block, same head, different piston. Look at the car specs and you find listings for 2V and 4V induction with different CR. If I remember it right, the "4V" 390 piston is the same one found in your garden variety 360. Those bean counters were pretty thrifty, they made it easy to add power with stock parts.

The high performance stuff was different: Bigger valves, different cores to maintain wall thickness, some had different valve spacing. You are talking high $$$ to build with those parts.
__________________
NO PRIDE-NO SHAME
'74 F-100 4x4: It's ugly, loud and smelly. Those are it's good points!

'96 Ranger XLT, 2.3L, 5-speed, 2 wheel drive.

Email me at Hypoids.haus at yahoo, visit me at RMFTC.com/forums
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2008, 01:39 AM
9299Fords's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Liberty, Idaho
Posts: 151
9299Fords is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypoid View Post
A half point? Not sure, but others will know.

One thing Ford did to change CR was change piston pin height: Same block, same head, different piston. Look at the car specs and you find listings for 2V and 4V induction with different CR. If I remember it right, the "4V" 390 piston is the same one found in your garden variety 360. Those bean counters were pretty thrifty, they made it easy to add power with stock parts.

The high performance stuff was different: Bigger valves, different cores to maintain wall thickness, some had different valve spacing. You are talking high $$$ to build with those parts.

I hadn't thought of pin height. I've seen lots of different piston top configurations and thought it might be there.

Doesn't really matter. If I decide to go with the '72 I'll be pulling heads, changing bearings, rings, pistons and throwing a new cam at it.
__________________

1992 F150 4X4 351, 1999 F250 4X4 7.3L,
1984 Harley Davidson
Rejuvinating 1965 F250 Custom Cab w/1975 360 for Best Bud's wife.
(That 360 needs to go or become a 390)

Recently aquired 1950 F-2 (engine to be determined)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2008, 02:16 AM
Hypoid's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 1,781
Hypoid is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Maybe both! Then you can play with gaskets, and actually the heads have different chamber volumes and runner sizes across groups of years.

I've been thinking about the guy who wants to do a budget 352 build, and how he can bump the CR with stock parts. I just don't have the free time to start running numbers for him.
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/73...l-economy.html

There is another forum that has more car related questions, but remains a good source for FE information.
332-428 Ford FE Engine Forum

You can always hit up Barry_R. He was a sponser here, but us poor-folk don't give him enough biz to justify the advertising dollar. He'll gladly answer questions all the same, and he won't sell parts that he wouldn't build with.
Survival FE Engine Kits

HTH, keep us posted.
__________________
NO PRIDE-NO SHAME
'74 F-100 4x4: It's ugly, loud and smelly. Those are it's good points!

'96 Ranger XLT, 2.3L, 5-speed, 2 wheel drive.

Email me at Hypoids.haus at yahoo, visit me at RMFTC.com/forums
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2008, 03:57 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: southeren Oh
Posts: 144
80broncoman is starting off with a positive reputation.
IIRC there are at least three different pistons for 390s
One a flatop with 4 valves eyebrows gave 10.5 to 1 in the older 4bbl motors.
Another flatop with 4 eyebrows AND a small dish gave 9.5 to 1 for 2bbl motors.
Then you had the truck engines which were always in 8s as in 8.6 or 8.2 to 1
I was always under the impression the trucks had a deeper dish piston.
The change in the 71 to 72 years asked about could something as simple as a different thickness head gasket.
On some ford engines in 72 (351W and 429-460) the deck height of the block actully changed by about .022 of a inch.
__________________
Real men don't wear Bowties
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2008, 11:42 PM
390428cjt's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: G.R. MICH. 49505
Posts: 242
390428cjt is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 390,s had 410 pistons the 360,s were the dished 352 pistons,, there were different type of pistons for the 390 as stated in the earlier post there were chamber volume differences in the heads as well that changes the compression ratings,, milling the heads will change the compression # but anything over 0.30 needs the intake manifold milled as well. The deck height didnt change for the FE motors 10.77 ctr of crank to top of block unless milled by a shop or PO.
__________________
390428cjt
FORD IS THE MOUNTAIN THE ROCK FELL OFF OF
1972 F-250 Camper Special 396 C-6 Dana 60 4.10 lim.
1996 F-150 XLT 4X4 5.8 Heavy Duty Package
1982 escort 52k 2dr hatch
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2008, 11:50 PM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 3,726
Bear 45/70 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Bear 45/70 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 390428cjt View Post
The 390,s had 410 pistons the 360,s were the dished 352 pistons,, there were different type of pistons for the 390 as stated in the earlier post there were chamber volume differences in the heads as well that changes the compression ratings,, milling the heads will change the compression # but anything over 0.30 needs the intake manifold milled as well. The deck height didnt change for the FE motors 10.77 ctr of crank to top of block unless milled by a shop or PO.
360s are a 4.05 bore and 352s are 4.00" bore, no interchange there. 410 pistons have the piston pin .010" higher in the piston and can have piston to head clearance problems.
__________________
Bear 45/70

Gimp Racing

Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he will just kill you.

Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 12:08 AM
390428cjt's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: G.R. MICH. 49505
Posts: 242
390428cjt is starting off with a positive reputation.
The overall length of the piston/rod on a 360 is longer than on a 390...the 360 pistons would stick out of the block if you just swapped in the 390 crankshaft. You can use the 360 pistons OR the 360 rods in a 390, but not both. (That's how 360's were built...using the 390 piston. The compression height of the 390 4V pistons with the long 352 rods and 3.50 stroke crank made 8.2:1, 390's used the 410 4V pistons to bring it down to 8.4:1.) The compression height of the 360 pistons is 1.776", which makes the perfect 390 piston. The 360 long rod is .052" longer than the 390 short rod, which combined with 1.680" compression height 390 truck pistons would also give good compression. However, the 360 rods are somewhat weaker than the 390 rods.

you are correct my bad on the 352 pistons but this is the real skinny on the rest!
__________________
390428cjt
FORD IS THE MOUNTAIN THE ROCK FELL OFF OF
1972 F-250 Camper Special 396 C-6 Dana 60 4.10 lim.
1996 F-150 XLT 4X4 5.8 Heavy Duty Package
1982 escort 52k 2dr hatch
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:45 AM
9299Fords's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Liberty, Idaho
Posts: 151
9299Fords is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for the information guys. It's much appreciated.
__________________

1992 F150 4X4 351, 1999 F250 4X4 7.3L,
1984 Harley Davidson
Rejuvinating 1965 F250 Custom Cab w/1975 360 for Best Bud's wife.
(That 360 needs to go or become a 390)

Recently aquired 1950 F-2 (engine to be determined)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy