Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Engine Swaps
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 10:39 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
302 swap

Okay here it is I have a 1987 Ford F250 4wd with a 302 in it "vin type 'N' " fuel injected. I believe its the regular type 302 non HO. this thing runs like ****. all the plugs are burning clean there are no more lifter noises. It idols smooth for the most part but then sometimes it lopes. I believe its the fuel injectors. and its only getting about 8 miles to the gallon. any Ideas on what the problem is.

also I have a E7TE witch I believe is an HO. I want to put heads on it but I'd like to know what would be the best heads to use I would like some good horses but then I would like to mantain some kind of gas milage with the awsome prices we're paying. I guess my question is what am I getting myself into. Ive heard different things like fireing order, change cam, yadda yadda yadda. I would also like to stay with fuel injection. with different fireing order how would this work.

I grew up around the shop my dad was a mechanic however I didnt follow in his footsteps for too long. so Im at loss
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 12:23 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 9,492
Kemicalburns is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Kemicalburns is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
well first the 302 is a dog in an f150 let alone an f250. the best bang for your buck would be to located an efi 5.8 and swap that in place. its a direct bolt in and will give you a 40lbs of torque gain right away. plus its easier to build power from this motor as well. not to mention the 5.8 in this size/weight of truck will get better mpg then a hi rpm motor like the 5.0.

also what size tires are you running right now?
__________________
94 XLT 5.8/E4OD
6"ProComp Stage II 35x12.5x15 BFG MT's ,
4.88 gears f/r
installing soon: JBA shorty, Bassani Y pipe, Edelbrock efi truck intake, , aussie front/rear
88 (Rolled)
http://www.supermotors.org/registry/vehicles/detail.php?id=4158
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 05:38 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
I think there 235/75/16
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 06:04 PM
Greg R's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Red Wing, MN
Posts: 152
Greg R is starting off with a positive reputation.
Have you pulled the codes yet? Sounds like you have a sensor(s) that is flaking out on you. My buddies '92 Ranger had problems simular to yours. Turned out the ACT (air charge temp) sensor was telling the computer is was -30* when the real air temp was 85*.
__________________
98 Ranger 2WD - 4.6 dohc, Ford prototype intake, custom headers, 4R70W trans, 8.8/4.10/TL, aluminum drive shaft, Lakewood traction bars,Mark VIII guages, Explorer buckets, rear auxiliary fuel tank (no midship), relocated fuel door
http://281ranger.homestead.com
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2052265
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 10:27 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
when I first got this truck I spent 1200 bucks at the local ford dealership to make it pass smog the changed a bunch of stuff and couldnt make it pass. it was running way way rich. a week later i found out who new there stuff in town and took it to him. he found that there was not enough vaccuum pressure to operate all the smog stuff that ford changed. he replaced a bunch of lines and all the sudden it passed smog. so yes I believe you are correct when you say a sensor. its running pretty good right now. but it does blow lots of black smoke. and runs rough through excellaration. but its ideling perfectly right now. i also believe its the enjectors because i found a receipt in the truck for a few being changed with used ones from the wrecking yard. any thoughts on this
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 10:39 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
If I went to a 5.8 will that cause smog issues. the state of california is a bit difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 12:21 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 9,492
Kemicalburns is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Kemicalburns is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
not it wont cause smog issues because the 5.8 was an option for your truck. just locate a wrecking yard 5.8 that is complete from intake to oil pan. the emissions stuff on your 302 will work on the 5.8. ive done this swap on my older 88 bronco before i rolled it. was the best upgrade i could have made. i gained 1 mpg in town and 2 on the hwy just from the swap. just get a low mileage motor.

oh and pull codes, something isnt right.
__________________
94 XLT 5.8/E4OD
6"ProComp Stage II 35x12.5x15 BFG MT's ,
4.88 gears f/r
installing soon: JBA shorty, Bassani Y pipe, Edelbrock efi truck intake, , aussie front/rear
88 (Rolled)
http://www.supermotors.org/registry/vehicles/detail.php?id=4158
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 03:13 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
okay I did the code thing and all I am getting is a 31 not sure what this means please help
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 03:25 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
this is what Ive found but it doesnt make sence to me

31 EVP - (O, R, M) EVP signal is/was out of range
EVR - (O, R, M) EVP signal is/was low
PFE - (O, R, M) PFE signal is/was low
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:56 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 9,492
Kemicalburns is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Kemicalburns is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Ford Fuel Injection
__________________
94 XLT 5.8/E4OD
6"ProComp Stage II 35x12.5x15 BFG MT's ,
4.88 gears f/r
installing soon: JBA shorty, Bassani Y pipe, Edelbrock efi truck intake, , aussie front/rear
88 (Rolled)
http://www.supermotors.org/registry/vehicles/detail.php?id=4158
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 06:25 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
okay after doing a bit more research I have found that the egr solinoid is not getting any vacuum to the egr valve and by reading the codes its a voltage problem does this mean my computer is bad??? the computer was one of the things i replaced when i got the truck because it had one from an 80's ford sable.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 08:50 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
replaced the eec and it didnt chance anything. my geuss is the evr. any ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 10:01 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 4,851
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
Code 31 says the EGR valve position sensor(EVP) is out of range, this has nothig to do with vacuum or any other sensor, change the EVP.
__________________
Paul O
-------------------------
1990 F150 4x4 XLT Extended Cab (Currently undergoing a heart transplant)
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 10:51 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ill will do that for sure. I was thinking it would be the evr because I get no vacuum to the egr and one on another web site showing what the codes mean it says something about the evr I dont know Im going to change both and see what happens
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 10:59 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 97
mcfaddendrafting is starting off with a positive reputation.
it makes sence though if the evp is not sending the right info to the ecm then the ecm will not be sending the right info to the evr wich in turn will not alow the egr to work so the unburnt fuel is not getting dumped back into the intake, hence all the black smoke Im getting. but is this enough to make it run bad? like a miss, and no power?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy