Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150 Performance Ford F-150's





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 01:58 PM
budribbs's Avatar
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
budribbs is starting off with a positive reputation.
oil separator

i purchased an oil separator kit about two months ogo from rpm outlet i did not install yet because i,m not impressed with it. any one know were i can get a better kit
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 01:03 AM
Stewart_H's Avatar
I Have A Need 4 Speed
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Coast of CA
Posts: 1,516
Stewart_H is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
L&S has a setup that works, but is ungodly expensive.

Garrett at DMR has a similar setup that works just as well, for less.

oil_separator

Stewart
__________________
1999 F150 Lightning (work truck)
- Woodbine Motorsports built block

2000 PSD 4X4 Excursion (wife's)
- John Wood tranny, DP-Tuner, AFE, MBRP 4", BDP 1.0, Overboost Annihilator, ITP Pre-Pump mod, Gauges from ITP, V & B code springs, Hellwig rear sway.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 02:04 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 3,133
Silver Streak is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I have a nearly free setup on my truck and it has worked well for me. I installed it after my truck started spitting out a cloud of smoke at start up and people were mistaking it for a small block Chevy. After I bypassed the PCV hose that bleeds boost into the crank case the cloud disappeared. Here's what you do:

Locate the PCV hose on the passenger's side valvecover. About halfway between the PCV valve and the upper intake you will find a rubber T that has a line running to the rear of the blower. The line running to the rear of the intake is evil for a few reasons. One, it bleeds boost into the crank case and blows oil vapors backwards thorugh the system into the intake boot. Two, it allows hot boost to recirculate through the upper intake preheating the incoming air. Three, it bleeds off boost. If you remove the T and replace it with a straight piece of vacuum line connecting the PCV valve directly to the plenum you get rid of all three of those problems. Put a plug over the eliminated line and secure it with a clamp and you're done. With that line out of the picture the crankcase will never see any pressure above atmospheric, and will probably see a slight vacuum even at WOT which might be worth a pony or two. I think it's also worth one or two lbs of boost, but it's hard to tell with the stock gauge.
__________________
1990 F-150XLT Lariat Stillon the original engine with no squeaks or rattles at over 300k miles
4.9/M5OD/3.08
16.89@77.09
145 rwhp, 272 rwtq

2001 Lightning #127
13.18@104, no chip, no pulley, no nitrous

Confuscious say "Man who have no use for jackstand have promising career as jackstand".
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 04:34 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 118
Milwaukee is starting off with a positive reputation.
I just used a compressor water collector.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 05:24 PM
ace555's Avatar
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 74
ace555 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver Streak View Post
I have a nearly free setup on my truck and it has worked well for me. I installed it after my truck started spitting out a cloud of smoke at start up and people were mistaking it for a small block Chevy. After I bypassed the PCV hose that bleeds boost into the crank case the cloud disappeared. Here's what you do:

Locate the PCV hose on the passenger's side valvecover. About halfway between the PCV valve and the upper intake you will find a rubber T that has a line running to the rear of the blower. The line running to the rear of the intake is evil for a few reasons. One, it bleeds boost into the crank case and blows oil vapors backwards thorugh the system into the intake boot. Two, it allows hot boost to recirculate through the upper intake preheating the incoming air. Three, it bleeds off boost. If you remove the T and replace it with a straight piece of vacuum line connecting the PCV valve directly to the plenum you get rid of all three of those problems. Put a plug over the eliminated line and secure it with a clamp and you're done. With that line out of the picture the crankcase will never see any pressure above atmospheric, and will probably see a slight vacuum even at WOT which might be worth a pony or two. I think it's also worth one or two lbs of boost, but it's hard to tell with the stock gauge.




Ok here's my question if you add a lower and upper pulley to your truck (good for 13lbs total) like i have, wouldn't you want as much oil as possible going into the s/c because of the extra rpm's? also I have white smoke at wot for a spirt- Isn't that also due to this problem as well?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 07:56 AM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 3,133
Silver Streak is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Why would you want any oil in the SC?

A puff of smoke at WOT could be caused by this or several other things.
__________________
1990 F-150XLT Lariat Stillon the original engine with no squeaks or rattles at over 300k miles
4.9/M5OD/3.08
16.89@77.09
145 rwhp, 272 rwtq

2001 Lightning #127
13.18@104, no chip, no pulley, no nitrous

Confuscious say "Man who have no use for jackstand have promising career as jackstand".
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:25 AM
Stewart_H's Avatar
I Have A Need 4 Speed
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Coast of CA
Posts: 1,516
Stewart_H is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace555 View Post
...wouldn't you want as much oil as possible going into the s/c because of the extra rpm's?
Ace, there's no way you can look at the following pictures and still believe you want oil to be sucked into the s/c.

Bottom of s/c...

-----------------------------------------------

Backside of throttle body...

-----------------------------------------------

Intercooler...

-----------------------------------------------

I/C "valley"...

-----------------------------------------------

How can all that be good, bro?

Coat the fins of the intercooler with enough oil and you'll reduce the efficiency of its cooling properties, which can raise the air charge temps, which can cause the PCM to pull timing, which will reduce your performance and power output.

Stewart
__________________
1999 F150 Lightning (work truck)
- Woodbine Motorsports built block

2000 PSD 4X4 Excursion (wife's)
- John Wood tranny, DP-Tuner, AFE, MBRP 4", BDP 1.0, Overboost Annihilator, ITP Pre-Pump mod, Gauges from ITP, V & B code springs, Hellwig rear sway.

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 03:41 PM
ace555's Avatar
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 74
ace555 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ok i hear you man, and i think it makes sense too. But why would ford design the supercharger to suck oil into the s/c from the valve body then? And you still think even with the extra amount of boost i'm running that its still fine to have an oil separator?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 03:46 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 3,133
Silver Streak is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
They didn't design it that way; it's a side affect of using a supercharger. Nothing should be touching inside the blower, so there is no need for any oil
__________________
1990 F-150XLT Lariat Stillon the original engine with no squeaks or rattles at over 300k miles
4.9/M5OD/3.08
16.89@77.09
145 rwhp, 272 rwtq

2001 Lightning #127
13.18@104, no chip, no pulley, no nitrous

Confuscious say "Man who have no use for jackstand have promising career as jackstand".
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 04:02 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 21,808
FTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputation
While this is certainly a great mod, I don't see it being good for 1-2lbs of boost. I just don't see how a tube that small can move that much air. Power benefits are probably due mostly to a cooler intake stream. I've got an accurate self-calibrating gauge and will find out this weekend after I mod it.
__________________
Ken Payne
Gone Fishing...
LACK OF PLANNING ON YOUR PART DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EMERGENCY ON MY PART.

2006 Roush F150 Project: Roush Supercharger, Troyer & My Tuning, 9lb pulley, Level 10 Trans, E-Fans, Oil Separator, Brandmotion GPS, BlueConnect Hands-Free Phone & iPod Direct Connect, Black Headlights & Taillights, Retrax Retractable Tonneau & more.
2004 F250 King Ranch Crewcab 4x4 6.0L PSD project: DP-Tuner Tuning and MBRP Stainless Dual Exhaust.
2000 Ranger Supercab XLT 3.0 V6 project: Bright Box, Mac Intake, Tonneau, my tuning.
RIP: 1967 & 1975 F100, looking for a 66 F100
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:26 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 3,133
Silver Streak is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Like I said, it's hard to tell with the stock gauge. The needle was noticably further into boost, but we all know the stock gauge sucks and once it's over 10 psi there's no reference point to judge from. A relatively small tube can be a big leak. I don't know how big the stock valves are, but you figure a 1.75" valve open .400" has 2.1 sq in of curtain area. A 3/8" tube has roughly .12 sq in, or just over 5% of the intake valve. 1 psi would be roughly 8% of 12 psi, so it isn't that far fetched when you consider that the tube will flow more efficiently than the valve will. There will always be more than one intake valve open, but the total opening will rarely be more than equivalent to one vavle at max lift. I think. It's late, it was a long flight and my brain feels like jelly.
__________________
1990 F-150XLT Lariat Stillon the original engine with no squeaks or rattles at over 300k miles
4.9/M5OD/3.08
16.89@77.09
145 rwhp, 272 rwtq

2001 Lightning #127
13.18@104, no chip, no pulley, no nitrous

Confuscious say "Man who have no use for jackstand have promising career as jackstand".
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 04:48 AM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Davepig is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace555 View Post
Ok i hear you man, and i think it makes sense too. But why would ford design the supercharger to suck oil into the s/c from the valve body then? And you still think even with the extra amount of boost i'm running that its still fine to have an oil separator?
They didn't design it that way, they just didn't look down the road that much or catch the problem during initial design.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2008, 01:18 PM
ace555's Avatar
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 74
ace555 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davepig View Post
They didn't design it that way, they just didn't look down the road that much or catch the problem during initial design.

Ok well why didn't they just change this small flaw along with the upgraded 2 or 3 rows in the intercooler on the 01 L's, and then again they could have in the 03-04s with the extra threads in the heads? My point is there have been many chances for Ford to do something about this problem. Don't get me wrong, i've been through a lot with my truck (just ask Stewart) and I understand what everyone is saying here, but my large question at hand is- would this oil separator pro-long or shorten our s/c's life? I Don't want anymore problems or bills coming out of my truck. Gas is already a B as it is.....
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2008, 09:00 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Davepig is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace555 View Post
Ok well why didn't they just change this small flaw along with the upgraded 2 or 3 rows in the intercooler on the 01 L's, and then again they could have in the 03-04s with the extra threads in the heads? My point is there have been many chances for Ford to do something about this problem. Don't get me wrong, i've been through a lot with my truck (just ask Stewart) and I understand what everyone is saying here, but my large question at hand is- would this oil separator pro-long or shorten our s/c's life? I Don't want anymore problems or bills coming out of my truck. Gas is already a B as it is.....
The oil separator is there to stop the oil from getting to the blower. Oil breaks down the teflon coating on the blower lobes, and also cloggs up the cooler as was shown in the pictures, causing detonation in the engines combustion chambers, etc, so we don't want it to get to the blower. The lobes don't require any sort of lubrication, so adding the separator is a good thing, and it would prolong the blower and it's associated parts life for the most part.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2008, 09:18 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 3,133
Silver Streak is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace555 View Post
Ok well why didn't they just change this small flaw along with the upgraded 2 or 3 rows in the intercooler on the 01 L's, and then again they could have in the 03-04s with the extra threads in the heads? My point is there have been many chances for Ford to do something about this problem.

My guess would be that those are both mechanical changes to the engine. Alterations to the PCV system would likely require the emmission control system to be recertified and that would have cost a ton. If this problem has been known about when they upped the power in 01 they probably could have done it then, but it wasn't and they didn't. The engines lasted 3 yrs/36k miles and that's all they are worried about.
__________________
1990 F-150XLT Lariat Stillon the original engine with no squeaks or rattles at over 300k miles
4.9/M5OD/3.08
16.89@77.09
145 rwhp, 272 rwtq

2001 Lightning #127
13.18@104, no chip, no pulley, no nitrous

Confuscious say "Man who have no use for jackstand have promising career as jackstand".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy