Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read




Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2001, 05:29 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Belpre, OH
Posts: 71
jimzdat is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

I'm having a odd problem on my motor, and hopefully someone here can help--first, here's the motor/vehicle specs:

-1983 F350
-351W, bored .040"
-302 "RV" cam--not sure of specs, it was in the shortblock when I got it
-Timing currently at 8BTDC, Vac advance is disconnected (caused much pinging)
-302 heads, stock valves, just had the bolt holes enlarged for the 351
-Edelbrock Performer 351W intake
-Holley 600 CFM 4BBL, elec choke, vac secondaries
-Hedmann Hedders, dual exhaust w/no cats
-C6 Transmission, with shift kit
-4.11 Rear end (truck is 2WD)

The Problem:
When the engine is cold, the transmission shifts just fine at high RPM (~5K)--gives that nice, hard shift-kit-shift. But once the engine gets a little warmed up, when you hit the same RPM range, the tranny tries to shift, and the engine seems to hit a "dead spot"--almost acts as if the valves were starting to float or something; it "bucks" a little, but will finally shift if I let out of it just a bit.

Any ideas floating around out there? If you need more info, I'll try and get you what I can.
   
__________________
Jim
Belpre, OH
91 Bronco EB, 5.8/E4OD/4"/35s
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2001, 12:28 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12
compman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

I've heard of problems like this caused by dirt or deposits in the valve body of the trans. I have also heard that some of the cheaper shift kits can cause hang ups between gears. I would suggest getting ahold of the shift kit manufacturor and see what they think.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-2001, 07:37 AM
jdt jdt is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3
jdt is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

I agree with a problem with the valve body or the modulator valve

FORD TRUCK FOREVER
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2001, 02:32 PM
slikness's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Durham
Posts: 1,100
slikness is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

I would guess modulator. You may want to get a little beefier modulator, I forget what strip color to use, but talk to someone who knows trannies. Also, you may want to try to put the transmission vacuum on a port by itself to see if that helps the shifting.

'82 F150 2WD w/351W (orig 300 I6)
Slik
__________________
Slik
300-I6 to 351W
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2001, 02:42 PM
slikness's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Durham
Posts: 1,100
slikness is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

Couple of other thoughts:

Why is your vacuum advance disconnected? And I don't think it should cause pinging to have the advance disconnected. Did you plug the vacuum source for your vacuum advance?

Also, would it be possible for the RV cam to have enough lift and duration that you're not creating enough vacuum? The tranny needs the vacuum to work properly.


'82 F150 2WD w/351W (orig 300 I6)
Slik
__________________
Slik
300-I6 to 351W
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2001, 10:04 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Belpre, OH
Posts: 71
jimzdat is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

Quote:
Couple of other thoughts:

Why is your vacuum advance disconnected? And I don't think it should cause pinging to have the advance disconnected. Did you plug the vacuum source for your vacuum advance?

Also, would it be possible for the RV cam to have enough lift and duration that you're not creating enough vacuum? The tranny needs the vacuum to work properly.


'82 F150 2WD w/351W (orig 300 I6)
Slik
I guess I better clarify that point--with the vac advance connected, it pulls the advance to approx 60 degrees BTDC at 3500 RPM--causes a whole lot of pinging--by disconnecting it, we limited the total advance to approx 40 deg BTDC--no more pinging.
Oh, and yes--did plug fitting.

Cam is not that radical a grind, a vac gauge reads around 18, so I don't think thats it--the odd thing is this just started recently, but the engine has been in there for 2 years, the trans for 1 year--that's why I'm thinking there might be some validity to the modulator argument--seems like one of those things that could have just failed on me
__________________
Jim
Belpre, OH
91 Bronco EB, 5.8/E4OD/4"/35s
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2001, 10:15 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 28
Roamer is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

jimzdat,

You might want to look into getting an adjustable vacuum advance module. I built a 351 with a lot of the same parts as yours and I also had a pinging problem, usually at part throttle when the engine was fully up to temp. My problem was caused a little too much compression (right at 10:1, but I live at 6000 feet) and I didn't reconnect EGR as the parts on the donner engine was completely useless and I didn't have the cash for new ones.

I did break down and buy an adjustable vacuum advance module. It didn't take a whole lot of adjusting to get the vacuum advance down to were the pinging was gone even on the cheap gas (no, that's not what I run usually!). And I get better fuel economy with the limited vacuum advance than I did with it disconnected or with the distributer retarded.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2001, 09:11 AM
slikness's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Durham
Posts: 1,100
slikness is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

Roamer makes a good point about the EGR valve. That can cause a lot of vacuum related problems if it does not close properly under acceleration. Also, be careful with measuring total advance under vacuum. The vacuum advance can really only be measured under load which means you would have to rig some way to read your advance while travelling down the road or by using some type of dyno that adds resistance to your drive train. The only problem you should run into without vacuum advance is a drop in gas mileage.

'82 F150 2WD w/351W (orig 300 I6)
Slik
__________________
Slik
300-I6 to 351W
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2001, 12:07 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Belpre, OH
Posts: 71
jimzdat is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

Well, EGR isn't an issue since it's not installed (gotta love the lack of emissions laws in TN) and if I take a hit on gas mileage I'd probably never notice--the beast only gets about 10 as it is.
But I do appreciate all the help--thanks everyone!
__________________
Jim
Belpre, OH
91 Bronco EB, 5.8/E4OD/4"/35s
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-31-2001, 08:50 PM
Franklin2's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Staunton VA
Posts: 18,040
Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE. Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE. Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE. Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE. Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

I agree with the modulator on the trans theory. You may have a hole in the line going to the modulator too. 5K is too high before shifting in my opinion, unless you have it floored, which would give you little manifold vacuum and thus make it shift higher which is the way it's supposed to work.
__________________
Dave F

1989 F250 XLT Diesel

Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2001, 08:41 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 28
Roamer is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

What I was implying on the EGR (and not doing a great job of stating) is that it does a GREAT job of helping your engine with ping resistance at part throttle by deluding the mixture with burnt exhaust gasses. When you step on it, the EGR valve closes (or it should anyway...) and you are back to pure mixture going into the chamber and not degredation in power. And when you don't have any vacuum (throttle open), there is no vacuum advance anyway, so you don't need it then. As far as emissions devices go, the EGR is one of the best in my books.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-01-2001, 09:57 PM
Franklin2's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Staunton VA
Posts: 18,040
Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE. Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE. Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE. Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE. Franklin2 has a great reputation on FTE.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

[font size="1" color="#FF0000"]LAST EDITED ON 01-Nov-01 AT 10:00*PM (EST)[/font][p]I'll have to disagree with the EGR statement. It does what it is supposed to do as far as bringing down emissions, and most of the time has to be retained legally, but any engine re-tuned to run without egr will run better. The reason you have to make sure it works on a stock engine is because the carb is tuned lean to work with it. If you eliminate the egr without compensation in the amount of fuel the carb delivers, pinging will definitely be the result. But the main reason I don't like it is because it's just something else to go wrong, and given enough time, it will screw up. That's why alot of vehicles have those timers that set the check engine light off, just so you will take it to the dealer where they are SUPPOSED to check the egr among other things to make sure it dtill works.
__________________
Dave F

1989 F250 XLT Diesel

Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2001, 10:21 PM
cbwarrior's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 384
cbwarrior is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

Make sure your vacuum line to the trans isn't getting weak with heat. My Olds had some clear tubing that when it got hot it collapsed and blocked the vacuum from getting to the trans. I learned the hard way to make sure there is a metal tube or thick vacuum line going that route. My trans eventually burned up. I had noticed it would shift erratically as it heated up, but I didn't think of the tube until I found it when I replaced the trans.

88 F-150 4X4 XLT Lariat w/5.0 EFI 5 spd (DAILY DRIVER)
86 Ranger 2WD w/2.3L EFI 5 spd to be 351W 4bbl C4 (NEW TOY- DETAILS WHEN FINISHED)
85 Old Cutlass Supreme 350/TH350 Holley 4160,Edelbrock Performer intake, el-cheapo headers, General Kinetics 270H series cam, 15.588 best 1/4 mile with original 10 bolt 2.41 gears (OLD TOY)
__________________
88 Ranger S-cab 2wd 2.3T 5spd Volvo FMIC 8UA IHI

88 F150 4X4 5.0L 5spd Short Bed (For Sale)

85 Cutlass Supreme w/ '73 455/TH350
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2001, 12:34 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 5
DougFerg is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting problem on a modified 351W

Reply With Quote


Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. are not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.