Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 2011 6.7L Ford Diesel
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

2011 6.7L Ford Diesel Discuss the upcoming Ford Powerstroke 6.7L diesel engine






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2009, 01:16 PM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,647
Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE.
The Urea reacts with the compounds in the exhaust. Both effectively cancel out. You will not be killing anyone when you drive by. Ford did not screw up anything, emissions mandates are forcing them to change.
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2009, 05:48 PM
Passin Thru Passin Thru is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 180
Passin Thru is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sorry for being so igorant. The way I understand it is Ford and International have screwed up the Powerstrokes so bad no one will buy them. Any thought to that. Now they are changing the whole design, then CAT and International are going together and will change the whole design and Ford will try to copy it. I am buying a GMC next time. I drive one haouling a 35 ft horse trailer and with 3 Belgians weighing 2000 apiece and a hay wagon, it will walk off and leave my 7.3 with a trailer and hay wagon in VA. Will keep this 97 PS but I'm done with Ford. I'm sure the Kingdom of California will come up with some reason Urea can't be used, like it's not manufactured there.
GOSH Sorry I had to rant. I have ahead cold.
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2009, 07:34 PM
rollerstud98 rollerstud98 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Airdrie Alberta
Posts: 2,333
rollerstud98 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 6.4 would do the same as that GM to your 97, Ford is not copying what International will be bringing to the table next. The 6.4 is a strong motor, were all hoping the 6.7 from Ford will be even stronger. The biggest thing is EGR, International is using strictly EGR to meet the emission mandates while pretty much all other manufactures are going the UREA/SCR route which if it works like they say should bring the mileage back up in the diesel world.
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2009, 08:24 PM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,647
Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE.
Unlikely, the biggest hit to mileage is from the DPF, which requires fuel to be dumped into the engine to burn the soot off.

@Passin-Thru, Ford still sold more 6.0s then duramaxes, and I bet they are still selling more 6.4s as well. Ford never designed anything on the 6.9/7.3 IDI, 7.3 PSD, 6.0 or 6.4 PSD. They simply bought the engines from international. The only reason ford ever dumped the 7.3,6.0 or 6.4 for that matter is because of emissions regs.

The 6.7 is not related in anyway to international, it is based off a Land Rover V8 diesel. Ford has no reason to copy International, since the engine is already developed and has been seen in working trucks.

California will not ban Urea, its needed to easily meet 2010 emissions, and it will not pollute any if it is being used properly - ex. not dumping it on the ground next to your car, instead of putting it into the car.

As for the Duramax being faster then an old 7.3, thats a given, newer enigne, more power. Same goes for the 6.4, its got much more power then a 7.3
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2009, 10:19 PM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,854
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head View Post
. Ford never designed anything on the 6.9/7.3 IDI, 7.3 PSD, 6.0 or 6.4 PSD. They simply bought the engines from international.

The oil filler caps on the 7.3-T444Es,6.0-VT365s,6.4-MaxxForce7s are sourced from Ford and why do the ECMs and IDMs on my T444Es have Ford part numbers?
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 139,000 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2009, 11:41 PM
Super08's Avatar
Super08 Super08 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 938
Super08 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. Super08 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
What is the freezing temperature of urea and what are they going to do in cold environments to prevent it from becoming a solid block if it does freeze?
__________________
2009 F350 CC SB Lariat PSD Auto 3.55LS
MODS: Truxedo LoPro, LineX, Bed Mat, Hijacker hitch
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2009, 11:47 PM
kane gray's Avatar
kane gray kane gray is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 91
kane gray is starting off with a positive reputation.
Glad I bought a 6.4.
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 12:07 AM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,647
Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by origcharger View Post
The oil filler caps on the 7.3-T444Es,6.0-VT365s,6.4-MaxxForce7s are sourced from Ford and why do the ECMs and IDMs on my T444Es have Ford part numbers?
As ford the IDM, it has a Ford part number the same way the top of the engine is labeled a "7.3 Powerstroke". Just ford sticking their own sticker on it. The PCM on the fords are different to accommodate full OBD-II and other truck control systems. But the the engine it self is no different
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 06:33 AM
origcharger origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,854
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head View Post
As ford the IDM, it has a Ford part number the same way the top of the engine is labeled a "7.3 Powerstroke". Just ford sticking their own sticker on it. The PCM on the fords are different to accommodate full OBD-II and other truck control systems. But the the engine it self is no different

But the top of our engines don't say "7.3 Powerstroke", they say "T444E" as they are in International school buses.
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 139,000 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 06:41 AM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,647
Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by origcharger View Post
But the top of our engines don't say "7.3 Powerstroke", they say "T444E" as they are in International school buses.
Not the valve cover sticker, the little plastic engine cover that ford throws on.
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 12:18 PM
rollerstud98 rollerstud98 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Airdrie Alberta
Posts: 2,333
rollerstud98 is starting off with a positive reputation.
His buses have Ford part numbered components on the motor
Reply With Quote
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 02:16 PM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,647
Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE.
It just shows that the parts are the same, I REALLY doubt ford actually had anything to do with the development of the 7.3.
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 03:48 PM
PowerStrokeHD PowerStrokeHD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,191
PowerStrokeHD has a great reputation on FTE. PowerStrokeHD has a great reputation on FTE. PowerStrokeHD has a great reputation on FTE. PowerStrokeHD has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super08 View Post
What is the freezing temperature of urea and what are they going to do in cold environments to prevent it from becoming a solid block if it does freeze?
I believe the freeze point of DEF (Diesel Emissions Fluid) is right around 20 degrees, but the EPA is allowing a period on non-compliance while the fluid thaws via on-board heating...
__________________
'04 F-250 Harley-Davidson 6.0L CC SB
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 09:27 PM
caprang's Avatar
caprang caprang is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,135
caprang is starting off with a positive reputation.
Gee how nice of the EPA!!
__________________
2008 F350 CC 4x4
Harley Davidson 6.4 PSD Auto
Job #3 build, 2" leveling kit, rear air bags, smoked cab lights and mirror lenses
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2009, 11:16 PM
Passin Thru Passin Thru is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 180
Passin Thru is starting off with a positive reputation.
Duramax for fuel mileage it is. Ford sux anymore. They could get it a lot higher I believe if they tried.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.