Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 2010 4.4L Ford Diesel
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

2010 4.4L Ford Diesel Discuss the upcoming 4.4L Ford diesel engine





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 02:11 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,400
Lead Head is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjthegreat View Post
exactly it not hp that moves the trailer its torque
Yes, but horsepower lets you get that load moving at speed.
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 02:50 PM
fordtruckman's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lawrence, Mi
Posts: 1,191
fordtruckman is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I would want MPG definitely because if the truck isnt going to get decent mpg instead has a whole lotta HP that i dont need then i wouldnt buy it.
__________________
Matt / Michigan Chapter Member

2004.5 F150 STX, 4x4, 4.6l, Scab / Click Picture
2007 Ford Fusion SEL V6

Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 05:02 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whitefield
Posts: 125
capt caper is starting off with a positive reputation.
Mostly I carry light bulky cargo. I don't need a 6.4. If they made a 150 with a decent diesel with mileage I'd buy it. Or a Super Duty with a smaller diesel. Although emissions would kill that one too I would think.
__________________
08 F350 6.4 Lariet DK.Blue/Silver CC Short Box SRW. Auto Manual 4x4,Supplemental Heater,3.73 Limited Slip

Prior owned 4x4's
02 SuperDuty
01 SuperDuty
99 Dodge Ram
93 Dodge Ram
88 Chev Blazer
85 GMC 2500
70 Chev 1500
74 Blazer 5.7
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 08:50 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 566
mnmwhit is starting off with a positive reputation.
I want the diesel in an EXPY
__________________
Max W

06 F-350 4X4 6.0 PSD NORTH POLE, ALASKA
Mobil-1 5-40 turbo diesel truck oil from day #1
98 gallon transfer flow tank
Leer topper insulated
MBRP SS409 turbo back Off-Road duel exhaust-CAT IS GONE
AstroStart 2-way Auto start
Go Rhino pushbar/brushguard,4-9" Lite-Force moose lites
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 11:02 AM
eatfish's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 146
eatfish is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would like to see Ford partner up with VW and put their 133 hp tdi into a ranger. That would be all the truck I need for driving around. Should get around 30 mpg. The little 240 in my '68 has done the trick for many years. Now I would be getting 10 more mpgs.
__________________
Fillet and Release >-))))*>
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 03:56 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Whitefield
Posts: 125
capt caper is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eatfish View Post
I would like to see Ford partner up with VW and put their 133 hp tdi into a ranger. That would be all the truck I need for driving around. Should get around 30 mpg. The little 240 in my '68 has done the trick for many years. Now I would be getting 10 more mpgs.
I could go for that too. I haven't been in a Ranger but I was in a Tacoma 4Dr. and the leg room was awesome for a big guy like me. My wifs Liberty is bad. I hate driveing it. No were to put my feet. They have to stay in front of the pedals so my knees are bent up bad.Not to mention the seats stink. Comfort would way in big time with me.
__________________
08 F350 6.4 Lariet DK.Blue/Silver CC Short Box SRW. Auto Manual 4x4,Supplemental Heater,3.73 Limited Slip

Prior owned 4x4's
02 SuperDuty
01 SuperDuty
99 Dodge Ram
93 Dodge Ram
88 Chev Blazer
85 GMC 2500
70 Chev 1500
74 Blazer 5.7
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 04:46 PM
eatfish's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 146
eatfish is starting off with a positive reputation.
Comfort means nothing to me. I would sit on a milk crate if I could get 30 mpg out of a small pick up. Want a vinyl interior, crank windows, and manual door locks. And most of all I want to be able to afford it. Now for my old lady... Thats another story.
__________________
Fillet and Release >-))))*>
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 06:23 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 522
KelVarnson is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.KelVarnson is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjthegreat View Post
exactly it not hp that moves the trailer its torque
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head View Post
Yes, but horsepower lets you get that load moving at speed.
Lead Head is right. If you're interested in doing actual work with the truck, like towing, horsepower is the determining factor. Diesels just have high torque numbers because they make their peak horsepower at lower RPMs.
__________________
'02 F250 SCLB 7.3 4WD, Just Turned 100k. 6637 Filter, 285/75 16 Michelin LTX-AT2's, Line-X, Snug-Top Shell, Yakima Racks. More to come...
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 04:59 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 122
pugster is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question Diesel Ranger

I stood next to a diesel Ranger in Scotland last summer. What engine are they putting in those? I don't know why they couldn't do it here.
__________________
Fords:
2008 F250SD, 4x4, 6.4L 15,900 mi.
1995 Explorer XLT, 200k/10 years Sold
1987 F150 XLT Lariat, 5.0L 208k, 8 years Sold
All bought new.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 08:40 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 330
hsfbfan is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugster View Post
I stood next to a diesel Ranger in Scotland last summer. What engine are they putting in those? I don't know why they couldn't do it here.
The new 2010 emissions are the main reason they couldn't use that engine.
__________________
1988 F-150 XLT 4x4
Manual Hubs
5.8L Automatic
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:26 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 437
tjthegreat is starting off with a positive reputation.
i kno but you dont need 381 or even 315hp to move it around in a half ton
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:57 AM
eatfish's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 146
eatfish is starting off with a positive reputation.
See here:

Ford launches new diesel engine for the Ranger, in Europe - AutoblogGreen

Now we are getting closer. I Just want it to come in a regular cab and without all the trim on the outside.
__________________
Fillet and Release >-))))*>
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 03:21 AM
hairyboxnoogle's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 105
hairyboxnoogle is starting off with a positive reputation.
there was supposed to be a 2.8L 4cyl turbo diesel with the powerstroke badge goin into 4dr rangers in S. America. Had and est. 28 mpg hwy. 133 hp and 285 ft. lbs of torque.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2008, 09:44 AM
mudmaker's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hardin, Montana
Posts: 1,557
mudmaker is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.mudmaker is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Have you guys heard about the possibility of the F100?? a little smaller than the F150. I am assuming it will offer a diesel, but dont know. They just said they were designing a smaller version of the f150 to get better mileage.
__________________
Marc

2002 F350 SRW CC LB 4X4

2002 Excursion Limited 4X4

PAA #20

Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2008, 09:29 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 608
884x4broncoII is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KelVarnson View Post
Lead Head is right. If you're interested in doing actual work with the truck, like towing, horsepower is the determining factor. Diesels just have high torque numbers because they make their peak horsepower at lower RPMs.
why do you need to accelerate fast pulling a trailer? i have pulled 14k with my 7.3 it would take a long time to get up to speed but once it got there it held it, thats alot more important that how fast i get to sped.
__________________
96 f250 7.3L powerstroke
5spd manual
4.10 axel ratio
extened cab long box
superchips max tuner
6637 filter
no kitty

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy