Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > Expedition & Navigator
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Expedition & Navigator 1997 - 2002 and 2003 - 2006 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator SPONSORED BY:

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:19 AM
JaySVX's Avatar
JaySVX JaySVX is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Collegeville, PA
Posts: 1,340
JaySVX has a very good reputation on FTE.JaySVX has a very good reputation on FTE.JaySVX has a very good reputation on FTE.JaySVX has a very good reputation on FTE.
I had a 97 Explorer XLT v8 5.0 AWD, and now have a 98 Expedition EB 5.4l v8 4x4. My expedition lacks one defining feature: a 3rd row seat. So, the expedition is literally like a really big explorer. Explorer was comfortable and towed well, but the expedition is better, and strangely, gets slightly better millage, though it doesn't do much day to day traffic commuting like the explorer did.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:18 AM
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK MisterCMK is online now
Avid Winter Hater
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 18,504
MisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputationMisterCMK has a superb reputation
We used to have a 1997 Explorer 4x4 4.0 SOHC 5spd auto and it was a nice truck. It towed our pop up trailer without a problem, ran great and also got much better mileage than the 2000 Expedition. The Explorer was averaging around 15mpg where the Expedition is around 11 (hardly any highway, mostly short trips). The Expedition is a much more capable tow vehicle and can haul more than the Explorer but it is also a larger vehicle.
__________________
Chris - Avid Winter Hater
2007 F-250 XLT 4x4 CC SB 6.0 PSD - ARP, IPR Gen2 EGR Delete, 4" turbo-back, no muffler, no cat, 6.4 banjo bolts, SCT X3, EA 270A Alt, coolant filter, air bags, Ranchos, etc.
1994 Mustang GT - HCI, Novi2k blower, MM suspension parts, etc
Hope & A Prayer Motorsports
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:57 PM
Trailblazen's Avatar
Trailblazen Trailblazen is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 501
Trailblazen is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Trailblazen is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
05/06 Expy do have 3rd row standard (03+ have them standard and hes looking into the 05/06) so ummm I dont think that would be a deciding factor for ol boy. Also Depending on if he gets a 4x4 or 4x2 also factors his MPG. The newer 5.4L's seem to be a little more efficient, I averaged (pre exhaust/intake) 18mpg Hwy and (Post Mods) 21-24mpg Hwy but also take into account im a 4x2 but still have the towing capacity with the HD Tow package. In the end its his choice, we are all just advisors so good luck in deciding big guy lol.
__________________

2009 F150 Lariat 4WD, 5.4L, 5.5' Bed,Factory Tow, K&N Intake, Flowmaster 40 Series-"Original" Dual Exhaust w/3.5" Stainless Tips/Pipes, SilverStar Ultra Headlights, Truxedo Truxport Tonneau, Tow Mirrors (7/19/13)
2003 Expedition XLT 2WD, 5.4L, Factory HD-Tow, K&N Intake, Flowmaster 40 Series-"DeltaFlow" single Exhaust w/4" Stainless Tip, SilverStar Ultra Headlights
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 08:03 AM
Mike in Ohio's Avatar
Mike in Ohio Mike in Ohio is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 151
Mike in Ohio is starting off with a positive reputation.
Trailblazen What mods did you do to the intake and exhaust to get that increase in mpg? Thanks alot, Mike
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:45 AM
Trailblazen's Avatar
Trailblazen Trailblazen is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 501
Trailblazen is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Trailblazen is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
All it was was High flow aftermarket filter and a cat back flowmaster (biggest help considering the stock muffler is huge and full of baffles which is only there to make the truck quieter). I basically had a average reading pre install on a long stretch of highway I traveled daily and then after install did the same average (I used my indash MPG readings to help) and it went up depending on speed. You also have to consider Im only 4x2 so I dont have the added weight and other things that go into 4x4 MPG. Everything I have done soo far is in my sig. Not alot compared to most the guys here but its enough for the time being for this daily driver of mine. Also big disclaimer is results may vary on MPG depending on your driving habits and conditions/terrain as well.
__________________

2009 F150 Lariat 4WD, 5.4L, 5.5' Bed,Factory Tow, K&N Intake, Flowmaster 40 Series-"Original" Dual Exhaust w/3.5" Stainless Tips/Pipes, SilverStar Ultra Headlights, Truxedo Truxport Tonneau, Tow Mirrors (7/19/13)
2003 Expedition XLT 2WD, 5.4L, Factory HD-Tow, K&N Intake, Flowmaster 40 Series-"DeltaFlow" single Exhaust w/4" Stainless Tip, SilverStar Ultra Headlights
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 10:54 AM
2000Expy's Avatar
2000Expy 2000Expy is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 689
2000Expy is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Put a chip, better exhaust and cold air intake on the Explorer and you'll have all you need to pull the popup, unless you just want a bigger vehicle.
__________________
2000 Expedition XLT 4x4
4.6L Triton engine
Bilstein shocks
16" Michelin X® Radial LT
Kenwood 10 CD-changer
Virginia Chapter
I'm never serious unless I should be.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2012, 08:44 PM
'Josh Patzer 'Josh Patzer is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
'Josh Patzer is starting off with a positive reputation.
i currently have 1999 ford explorer 5.0l V-8 AWD XLT and love it. Getting a 2000 ford expedition 4.6l XLT for a ltille more room and cant wait. already drove the expedition, and only complaint i have is the 4.6l V-8 just doesnt pull it along like the 5.0 in the explorer does. smaller motor in the bigger expedition is kind of silly, but oh well.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2012, 09:09 PM
Trailblazen's Avatar
Trailblazen Trailblazen is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 501
Trailblazen is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Trailblazen is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
if it were me I would try to find a 5.4L. More bang for your buck. Love the space though in my expy. I also got a 2005 Lariat F150 4X4 about 2 years ago and loving the space/cargo in that as well. Like my Expy I got Flowmaster exhaust and K&N intake in my F150 and it helps.
__________________

2009 F150 Lariat 4WD, 5.4L, 5.5' Bed,Factory Tow, K&N Intake, Flowmaster 40 Series-"Original" Dual Exhaust w/3.5" Stainless Tips/Pipes, SilverStar Ultra Headlights, Truxedo Truxport Tonneau, Tow Mirrors (7/19/13)
2003 Expedition XLT 2WD, 5.4L, Factory HD-Tow, K&N Intake, Flowmaster 40 Series-"DeltaFlow" single Exhaust w/4" Stainless Tip, SilverStar Ultra Headlights
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2012, 08:00 AM
rtbrjason rtbrjason is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 14
rtbrjason is starting off with a positive reputation.
Wow lots of former exploder owners here.

I had a 98 Explorer EB with 5.0 and AWD. I loved it but recently picked up a 99 Expedition EB with 4x4 and 5.4. There is no real comparison. The explorer is more of a large car. The Expedition is much more of a truck and having real 4x4 (hi/low), more room make it much more useful without sacrificing really anything. Interior is even more comfy and mpg seems to be about the same. I get about 12-13 around town and 16-17 pure highway.

Power is about the same between older 5.0 in the Explorer and the 5.4 in the Expedition. The 5.4 definitely feels like it has a bit more torque down low though (which it does).

In the case of either vehicle, i strongly prefer the older models in Eddie Bauer trim. 97-01 or so.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2012, 12:48 PM
59CRL's Avatar
59CRL 59CRL is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 287
59CRL is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.59CRL is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Had 4 explorers of various years. They all go the same mileage as my 2000 Eddie Bauer with the 5.4, but I can tow more with the Expedtion. It was worth it to upgrade to a bigger vehicle, the Explorer was way to small.
__________________
2004 Excursion Limited - Mineral Grey
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2012, 09:34 PM
rowekmr rowekmr is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 381
rowekmr is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.rowekmr is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I had a 98 Explorer Ltd w/4.0 that I drove until the engine self grenaded because of timing chain (replaced and sold) then bought a 98 Explorer 5.0 AWD as a DD and to tow my boat. It didn't do so well with mpg's in city driving so I bought a car for a DD. I later traded both car and 98 Exp for a 06 Explorer with the 4.6L engine (292 hp) and 6 speed trans and it was definitely improved. It pulled the boat a little better but got much better economy with the newer drivetrain. It had the 3 rows of seats that I needed yet I could get 24-25 mpg on the expressway at legal speeds (empty) and with the 4wd low it pulled the boat up the ramps with the engine at idle. When I bought the boat I was told it was 6,000 pounds yet after a few years I took it to the scale and the boat/trailer was 8,000 so you know I was really suprised. Both Explorers V-8 pulled the boat safely with the last one towing it for 5 years. I now have a 03 Navigator (Exp clone) and it does pull the boat better but the fuel economy leaves much to be desired. Before I bought it I thought it would get 20 mpg on the expressway and posted a question here where everyone said it wouldn't. I thought their trucks were out of tune or worn out but this well running truck gets exactly 16.7 at 65 mph. I got this one so I could get rid of the tow vehicle for my travel trailer and this Navi tows it decent but not like a HD truck but I am saving on expenses in having 1 vehicle instead of 2. For what it was designed to do both trucks do well.
__________________
03 Excursion Ltd 6.0L ARP studs/HG, blue spring mod, 6.4L Banjo bolts, K&N CAI, turbo back exhaust, coolant filter, IDP tunes, SCT Livewire
03 Lincoln Navigator (sold)
96 Regal 258
08 Jayco 31 BHDS G2
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2012, 08:36 AM
2trux 2trux is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 141
2trux is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have a 97 expedition 5.4L and an 05 Explorer 4.6L. The Explorer gets 3 MPG better mileage as a DD. Also while pulling our Popup (~2300 lbs) the Explorer gets better mileage. When I pull a heavy load I prefer the Expedition as it is a heavier truck so seems less susceptible to being pushed around by the trailer. The Expy air suspension is also a plus to keep the trunk level.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:51 AM
hodges710's Avatar
hodges710 hodges710 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 420
hodges710 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I Have a 98 xlt Expedition 4x4 with the 4.6. I get 15 around the city and 21 on the highway, of course when in 4x4 the mpg drops. The first few years of the Expedition 97 to 99 the 5.4 were junk, some in late 99 were not as bad when they had the PI head change.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2012, 11:13 PM
James_24_85's Avatar
James_24_85 James_24_85 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Culleoka TN
Posts: 192
James_24_85 is starting off with a positive reputation.
We have an 06 eddie bauer 4x4 with programmer drop in filter and flowmaster we get 16 city 18 hwy very happy with it. would pull anything you would want to hook to it. I pull a full size bronco with it. Big comfortable and the 300 hp 5.4 still makes it fun to drive. We love it. I think the only exploder (lol) I would want would be the newest one with an ecoboost.
__________________
2000 F250 4x4 CC. Completely stock except for 33" all terains.
1998 Ranger, lowered custom paint, Daily driver 200,000 miles and counting.
2004 Jeep wrangler Rubicon, 4" lift 35" bfg M/t's, factory lockers warn bumpers and slides, 9k winch, rhino lined tub, all kicker stero including stealth 10 in the rear seat. This beast is my baby.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2012, 08:07 PM
Redneckfordf2502002's Avatar
Redneckfordf2502002 Redneckfordf2502002 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Backwoods of Snowflake AZ
Posts: 8,080
Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.Redneckfordf2502002 has a spectacular reputation.
When we were looking for a truck for my mom we tried Explorers and Epxeditions and Excursions. We ended up getting the Expedition because it was big enough for the family of 6 and much more roomy. The only reason we didn't get the Excursion was because we couldn't find a good deal on it with a gas engine. We already have a F250 so no need really for a big Excursion.
Trav
__________________
Build thread for 73 Harley, 07 Harley, 84 B2 4x4, 85 Chevy van, 88 F150 4x4 (secondary build), 89 F250 4x4, 97 Expedition 4x4, 02 F250 4x4 91 F250 4x4 94 Explorer 4x4 96 ranger: vehicles above build, 89 f350 crew 1987 E350 motorhome
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 08:07 PM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > Expedition & Navigator

Tags
2006, compare, comparing, cost, difference, expedition, expedtion, expidition, exploer, explorer, ford, insurance, verschil, versus, vs, vsexpedition

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup