Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 2011 6.7L Ford Diesel
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

2011 6.7L Ford Diesel Discuss the upcoming Ford Powerstroke 6.7L diesel engine






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 08:54 PM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,681
tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERDUTY_untouchabl View Post
I fixed that for you...
Thank you kind sir.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
Beta Spartan Phalanx
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
Suncoast Heavy Duty Torqshift Rebuild
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 05:20 PM
97squarebody 97squarebody is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 229
97squarebody is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tex25025 View Post
I have heard of some getting 12 and maybe a few tenths more then 12, but 12 seems to be it's high point for a stock 6.4. I don't know what they are getting for those that have removed the dpf and all the other epa "stuff".

There are people who are getting better mileage out of them. Some people are getting 15-18 MPG. There are two problems with them that lead to low MPG, and both are operator driven.

1) Trans choice. Pure and simple, the sticks are averaging 2+ MPG better under all uses. Like them or not, the autos suck 10 to 15% more fuel. The odd thing is that with everybody whining about mileage, few are willing to shift their own gears. (I guess I am the odd man out here.)

2) Driving style. The new motor has LOTS of get up and go off the line. People are driving them like a light weight performance gas truck. Hate to break it to them but their trucks weigh between 7,000 and 9,300 LBS. Accelerate like they did with a 7.3 and mileage jumps.

If you don't believe me on this stuff, spend some time digging around the 6.4 forums. The information is there, it is just buried under a ton on people wanting to blame everyone from Ford to the EPA for their choices and driving habits. The new American dream, no personal responsibility....
__________________
CL

So, who hired Wile E. Coyote as a consultant?


1997 F-250 4WD W/460 & a manual
2008 Explorer Sport trac
2003 SVT Focus (The Go-Cart)
1967 Mustang Coupe W/351W & a 3spd. (Temporarily Retired)
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 06:18 PM
littleme13's Avatar
littleme13 littleme13 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,417
littleme13 has a good reputation on FTE. littleme13 has a good reputation on FTE.
dont know if its been mentioned and if it has sorry but the truth to the 6.7 must be even wikipedia has it listed in the new f-series line up.
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 08:13 PM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,681
tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 97squarebody View Post
There are people who are getting better mileage out of them. Some people are getting 15-18 MPG. There are two problems with them that lead to low MPG, and both are operator driven.
There are alot more problems then then the two that you mentioned that can't be helped by how the driver acts.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
Beta Spartan Phalanx
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
Suncoast Heavy Duty Torqshift Rebuild
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 11:10 PM
biz4two's Avatar
biz4two biz4two is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 4,204
biz4two has a good reputation on FTE. biz4two has a good reputation on FTE.
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by tex25025 View Post
There are alot more problems then then the two that you mentioned that can't be helped by how the driver acts.
I agree with you there!

Here are my top 3...(in no particular order)

1. REGEN
2. REGEN
3. REGEN

If it were not for the REGEN cycle (which happens way to often), the 6.4L PSD would be up 3-5mpg easy. FORD has recognized the low mpg's...and is now offering in the Build #3 SD's the 3.55 gear ratio and massive front lower air dam. Those are facts...and the owner has nothing to do with that. Plan and simple...IMHO.


biz
__________________

2003 F250 SD SC 142" XLT FX4 V10 Auto 4x4 3.73s
1976 F150 LWB Custom 4x4 390FE NP435 3.50s
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 03:42 AM
armysoopertrooper armysoopertrooper is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 16
armysoopertrooper is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
Cummings 6.7

Cummings makes a Q.S.B. 6.7 L that is adjusted for military applications coupled with an Allison tranny. Its rated at 276 HP and 627 FT LB. The number just caught my eye. I'm probably adding fuel to a fire that will still probably just quietly die. I now wonder if Ford and Cummings are mating up.
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 07:19 AM
winged1dur winged1dur is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lynnfield,MA
Posts: 84
winged1dur is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by armysoopertrooper View Post
Cummings makes a Q.S.B. 6.7 L that is adjusted for military applications coupled with an Allison tranny. Its rated at 276 HP and 627 FT LB. The number just caught my eye. I'm probably adding fuel to a fire that will still probably just quietly die. I now wonder if Ford and Cummings are mating up.
You mean Cummins?
__________________
1999 F250LD 4x4 5.4 auto 3.73ls
2006 F350 4x4 DRW 6.0 PSD auto 4.10ls
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 07:47 AM
armysoopertrooper armysoopertrooper is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 16
armysoopertrooper is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
Thank you for highlighting my typo. You are correct sir; I most certainly did mean Cummins. Forgive me for my error and I will forgive you for writing a fragment and not an actual sentence. I’m sure you were thoroughly confused and could not extract the meaning of my post. Again, please forgive me.
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:05 AM
origcharger origcharger is online now
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,854
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE. origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Its just a coincidense that the B-series Cummins is now 6.7 liters and Fords future V8 diesel is 6.7 liters.
__________________
2004 E-450 6.0 139,000 miles
7,500 mile, 15 quart oil changes, 5W-40 Rotella.
UOAs consist of checking for metal on drain plug magnet. All stock, no mods. Dyed fuel with no additives. Never been reflashed.
Total parts replaced;
one EGR valve.
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 07:37 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro preppypyro is offline
Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatoon Sk.
Posts: 33,277
preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold
I have one of the last model 7.3 diesels in my 03. I could care less if the new 6.7 makes alot more power. If it can last as long, and get the fuel economy that the tried tested and true 7.3's can manage, Im sold!

I personally know guys with the 6.uhoh diesels in their superduties, and I can honestly say I dont think I would ever get one.

Lets hope ford doesnt have another 6.uhoh disaster!
__________________
$Sheldon$
2003 F-250 supercab shortbox 4x4 lariat
~Everythings legal man as long as ya dont get caught~
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:48 PM
tex25025's Avatar
tex25025 tex25025 is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,681
tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE. tex25025 has a great reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by preppypyro View Post
Lets hope ford doesnt have another 6.uhoh disaster!
It wasn't a total disaster, I'm not disappointed one bit with my 6.0. Y'all 7.3 guys are stuck in the past, but I guess if your happy then so be it, I just refuse to settle.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
Beta Spartan Phalanx
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
Suncoast Heavy Duty Torqshift Rebuild
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:57 PM
F350-6's Avatar
F350-6 F350-6 is offline
Slow Typing
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 12,673
F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by tex25025 View Post
It wasn't a total disaster, I'm not disappointed one bit with my 6.0. Y'all 7.3 guys are stuck in the past, but I guess if your happy then so be it, I just refuse to settle.
Of course we're stuck in the past. We enjoy it here. Sheldon does make some valid points though. Each newer generation motor comes with more power, more emissions stuff, and worse mileage. Not to mention they're getting crammed in the engine bay pretty tight now.

The guys that want more power can get a tuner. I'd like to see less power and more MPG's, and I'd prefer an engine that does not require the cab to be removed to perform repairs.

A word of warning about your truck Tex. The 6.0's taste better than the 7.3's. I've had 2 06's & 1 07 taken down by squirrels getting into wiring. Never had that problem with any of the 7.3's.
__________________
Chris
2002 F350 6-speed 444 CID. XLT, Heated Seat, 310,000 & counting.
RHN Mods & Maintenance

“Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.” Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:19 PM
Lead Head Lead Head is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,647
Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE. Lead Head has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by F350-6 View Post
Of course we're stuck in the past. We enjoy it here. Sheldon does make some valid points though. Each newer generation motor comes with more power, more emissions stuff, and worse mileage. Not to mention they're getting crammed in the engine bay pretty tight now.

The guys that want more power can get a tuner. I'd like to see less power and more MPG's, and I'd prefer an engine that does not require the cab to be removed to perform repairs.

A word of warning about your truck Tex. The 6.0's taste better than the 7.3's. I've had 2 06's & 1 07 taken down by squirrels getting into wiring. Never had that problem with any of the 7.3's.
Is that really fair your last post there? The 6.0 and 7.3 both use the same style injection system, they could both be as easily taken down by electrical problems
__________________
- Ian

1987 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 2.9

Needs a lot of work, including some rot on the body, but shes getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:38 PM
F350-6's Avatar
F350-6 F350-6 is offline
Slow Typing
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 12,673
F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future F350-6 has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head View Post
Is that really fair your last post there? The 6.0 and 7.3 both use the same style injection system, they could both be as easily taken down by electrical problems
It's not electrical problems. It's the friggin squirrels that walk right by the 7.3 and decide to munch on the 6.0's. I had to install a couple of cats (the 4 legged kind) in the yard to keep the 6.0's running. It's been almost a year so far and it seems to be working.
__________________
Chris
2002 F350 6-speed 444 CID. XLT, Heated Seat, 310,000 & counting.
RHN Mods & Maintenance

“Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.” Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:56 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro preppypyro is offline
Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatoon Sk.
Posts: 33,277
preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold preppypyro is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by tex25025 View Post
It wasn't a total disaster, I'm not disappointed one bit with my 6.0. Y'all 7.3 guys are stuck in the past, but I guess if your happy then so be it, I just refuse to settle.
I guess it depends on what you think im stuck in the past about.

Im settling with a good solid reliable truck that will probably (not for surely) last a long time after im done with it, with little to no problems.

Theres no denying that the 6 liter has a bad rep, and for good reason. Ive said it a billion times, id love the extra power of a 6 liter, but with all the well documented problems, Id rather settle for a truck that has alot less chance of leaving me on the side of the road.

I shouldnt say it was a total disaster either, but it was pretty bad. I remember when I was truck searching, just about every ford dealer i went to advised me to stay away from the 6 liter. That was the salesman telling me that! The one guy even told me the one truck he sold almost came back to kill him, by the owner saying he was gonna drive it through the window of the dealership if they didnt fix everything!

Im just curious, would you rather have more hp/torque, or a truck that can last over 500,000 miles? I would love both, but I would take the latter of the two if I had to choose.

IMO ford motor company should have a rock solid reliable truck that will last along time. Longevity being the key in my opinion. So with the modern technology, and chance of less reliability, Im pretty confident where I settled

All in all I hope the 6.7 does well, i still just hope they dont have an abundance or problems, like the 6 liter is well known for.
__________________
$Sheldon$
2003 F-250 supercab shortbox 4x4 lariat
~Everythings legal man as long as ya dont get caught~
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
30e , power , stroke

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.