You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
I could be wrong, but my understanding was that the Chev 409 was used in medium and heavy duty Chev trucks and the 534 was used in Ford MDT/HDT.
I'm assuming that the Ford 534 might of been the better truck engine, due to it's significantly greater displacement which would give more torque than the 409, I'm guessing.
I'm also thinking that as the Ford was a purpose built truck engine and the Chevy 409 did double duty as a car and truck engine, that Ford would of had a chance to make sure that the 534 design could be pure truck.
But not having had any experience with either engine, I leave it to those, that know.
Shows this for series 80 and 60 trucks. The 60 is roughly equal to the F600 of the time, I think. Not sure about the 80, maybe the F700 or so.
quote from another posting, stay tuned:
Join Date: Jul 2004
I just found my 1962 Motor's truck manual. The 534 is listed as having 270 h.p. @ 3200 r.p.m., and 481 ft. lbs. @ 1900. The GMC 702 V-12 is listed at 275 h.p. @ 2400 r.p.m., and 630 ft. lbs. @ 1600 r.p.m.. The International 549 V-8 is listed at 256 h.p. @ 3200 r.p.m., and 505 ft. lbs. @ 2000 r.p.m.. Kind of fun looking at the spec.'s of those old monsters!
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.