Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Small Chassis Trucks > Ranger & B-Series
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  

Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series modelsSPONSORED BY:






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2008, 06:23 PM
SpikedCola SpikedCola is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7
SpikedCola is starting off with a positive reputation.
Built the pcb and gave it to my friend, just waiting for him to try it out and let me know whether or not it worked.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2008, 07:07 AM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hey guys.

Built the emulator, get a pretty decent output on the oscilloscope.


The truck doesn't recognize it... it shows zero hz with or without the emulator, and 170 hz with the crappy broken sensor plugged in.



Is the signal line supposed to be pulling through a 10k ohm resistor? or is that internal to the computer?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2008, 06:57 PM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hey guys,


I fixed the circuit so that it works. It is significantly more complicated, but is still only about 10 bucks from radio shack and will replace a 650$ sensor.


Anybody interested in diagrams
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2008, 08:59 PM
Rockledge's Avatar
Rockledge Rockledge is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 8,781
Rockledge is a name known to all Rockledge is a name known to all Rockledge is a name known to all Rockledge is a name known to all Rockledge is a name known to all Rockledge is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toehead View Post

Anybody interested in diagrams
Yep!
__________________
'98 Ranger XLT 4x4 (4.0L)
'97 Taurus GL (3.0L Vulcan)
'94 Taurus SHO (MTX)
Ford Pics
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2008, 10:07 PM
matt's2.9STX matt's2.9STX is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Southeast MI
Posts: 730
matt's2.9STX is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm watching too.

Never know & I'm a mild geek too, so never know when somebody might need something like that. I'm not as clever as all this, but I followed easily the diagrams. I'm impressed so far. Keep it coming!
__________________
Tweaking '93 red 4x4 STX for no nonsense work truck. Full duals & P265 Uniroyals.

Last edited by matt's2.9STX; 08-29-2008 at 10:07 PM. Reason: misspelled - sticky key
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 12:49 AM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ok!

I'll draw up a hand sketch tomorrow and scan it in.

The problem with the original circuit is that the frewuency is right, but the sensor also changes pulsewidth depending on the fuel temperature. It was giving a pulsewidth of 8 milliseconds, which is telling the computer that the fuel is boiling, and is way outside normal range of 1-5, so the computer just doesn't recognize the signal.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 12:57 AM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'd also like to do some testing to make sure it's working 100%. I'll hook up the computer and see what frequency the ECM is seeing, and make sure it is in the proper range for 87 octane gas.

Who knows, I can even make an e-85 version, or a manually switchable version!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 01:34 PM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
OK,

Hooked up the scanner and voila, the ecm is seeing the frequency. It is reading out as 67 Hz, a little higher then the design frequency of 60 Hz, but math only takes you so far with electronics.

So, all systems seem to be go. 67 Hz is about perfect for 10 percent ethanol, which is the norm in most of the country anyway.

The pulsewidth is about 3 ms, indicating a fuel temp of about 90 F, which is right in the middle of the range. I can't see this causing a problem either way.

If anybody wants these who doesnt feel up to messing with electronics, i've been seriously considering making a bunch of them to sell.

I'll get the schematics posted soon.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 08:30 PM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
Another update:
Finished the emulator. I put it in a small box and completely filled it with epoxy so that it will be watertight. I spliced it into the harness and strapped it to the side of the framerail. It actually looks very professional and i'm very happy with the result.
I took the truck for the maiden voyage. Drove it about half an hour with no check engine light.

Looks like it worked. I'll keep testing to ensure longevity, but I don't see any reason for it to not last for many many years, especially with it being encapsulated in epoxy
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2008, 11:35 PM
mark914 mark914 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Connecticut
Posts: 326
mark914 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Toehead, or anyone else, I just found this post and would be interested in any diagrams or pictures you may have. I have a 2000 Ranger with a bad Flex Fuel sensor, and would love to be able to bypass this sensor on my own.

Any help would be appreciated

Thanks
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 08:31 AM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hey man, I will scan the schematic today.


The box is still working. been a few months now
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 06:23 PM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
You can't upload files to this board? That's kind of a pain.


Whats your email, i'll send it on over
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:40 PM
mark914 mark914 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Connecticut
Posts: 326
mark914 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for the quick response.

My email is mhaeckel "at" sbcglobal.net

Not sure if this board filters out full email addresses or not.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:47 PM
Toehead Toehead is offline
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
Toehead is starting off with a positive reputation.
All set. You've got email!
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2008, 03:01 PM
Evil Result Evil Result is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Evil Result is starting off with a positive reputation.
Just curious if anybody might still have that schematic as i am i current sufferer of Fuel composition sensor check light and that there prototype is an amazing idea.... o can that have adjustability?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2002 , diagrams , flex , ford , fuel , ranger , sensor

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.