Suuuure, that's what they all say...

Why don't you have a seat...Right over there...Have a seat.



Tim

 

hahahah, my bad! I thought u mean OP as in Original Poster! lol. Opps. Srry to the OP. But ya, i still have that feeling to. 32 posts later lol

 

I was waiting for a Chirs Hansen pic!

 

14 and 14 is "okay". 15 and 14 is "okay". Not right, but okay. But an adult with a minor is still a crime in Canada.

 

I aggree on the first part. But I'm not so sure if your right on the second part. I might be wrong & I'm certainly no expert on the law by any means, but I think consent is consent. It ain't right but I think, if both are consenting, and both are 14 or older; no crime is being committed. Being a father, and three of mine being girls; I purticularly don't like this. My youngest is 14 and my wife and eye keep a close eye on her activities. We don't allow her to date one on one with a boy. We do allow her to go out with friends, some of those may be boys, but it stays as a group. I don't think most 14 year olds are emotionally mature enough to handle relationships.
Call me old fashion, but that formula worked well her two older sisters and they're in their 20's now. Sorry for the rant....

 

I don't think you're old fashioned. I think you're going about it the right way. But consent or not, an adult can't have sex with a minor. Like it's "legal" for a 17 y/o with a 14 y/o, but illegal for a 19 y/o with an 18 y/o. (Depending on what province you live in.)

 

I think your right.... I just looked up Bill C15 and it says:

Amendments to the Criminal Code in 1988 repealed the aforementioned unlawful intercourse and seduction offences. In their place, Bill C-15 created new offences called "sexual interference" and "invitation to sexual touching" that now prohibit adults from engaging in virtually any kind of sexual contact with either boys or girls under the age of 14, irrespective of consent. Introduced at the same time, the offence of "sexual exploitation" also makes it an offence for an adult to have any such contact with boys and girls over 14 but under 18, where a relationship of trust or authority exists between the adult and child.

So at least there's some protection for our kids. But bottom line is. I wouldn't want a 19 or 20 year old guy trying to pick up my kid. Because 14,15 or 16 is still a kid.

I guess we kind of high jacked that one....eh

 

The phrase here in Texas is "4 years will get you 20"

 

I think that pretty much says it all.

 

That's way too young. 16'll get YOU 20.......

 

Being a guy who dated somebody who was turning 15 at the time I was turning 17, I know first hand that that statement is true.

As to the OP thats just wrong

 

^^^Yeah a girl that young is going to be really into 'tweener' type stuff, while the guy might be more into adult things, since he is one now.....

 

awww come on people... thats just fine... just like eating other people is fine and burning animals alive is fine too... yea actually on second though... UM NO NEVER!!!

 

I've seen those exact same words with that exact same picture on another "certain" website. Coincidence?

 

It honestly must be...There's only 2 forums I frequent, and I didn't see it or your question on the other...

Tim