Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 02:06 PM
thorseshoeing's Avatar
Sexxxy Beast
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Greeneville Tn
Posts: 5,359
thorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevil3758 View Post
and ive had 2700 in my ranger id hate to see what that would do to a nissian
2,700 pounds in the bed? I'd like to see what it did to your ranger...

Tim
__________________
Quote of the week...And no, it has not been edited.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93RangerXL4x2
ford is the kind ford changed it all for years, ford rethink truc, and is always better, ford is the best, toyota has moved forward since they said that.
Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 02:50 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nj
Posts: 93
bluedevil3758 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thorseshoeing View Post
2,700 pounds in the bed? I'd like to see what it did to your ranger...

Tim
well actually it was my dads then, but i was 16 and yea it wasnt good especially since it only has 3 leafs while the newer ones have 4 or 5 with the payload package but it was only for a couple miles and it did it, oh it was a yard of stone if anyones wondering barely fit
__________________
1999 ranger 3.0l 4x4 4.10

2005 f150 2wd 5.4 scab 3.73s
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 10:02 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 340
tjthegreat is starting off with a positive reputation.
ford was the best
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2008, 06:15 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: outback
Posts: 594
elemint is starting off with a positive reputation.
If they do not come out with an amazing MPG engine SOON they will be sunk. They should have been working on a new Ranger a long time ago as well. We are heading for a MAJOR economic crash and Ford is not taking this into account at all. Not that they are alone...
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 11:40 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 544
mnmwhit is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ford will be fine. They will have to weather the storm just like us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elemint View Post
If they do not come out with an amazing MPG engine SOON they will be sunk. They should have been working on a new Ranger a long time ago as well. We are heading for a MAJOR economic crash and Ford is not taking this into account at all. Not that they are alone...
__________________
Max W

06 F-350 4X4 6.0 PSD NORTH POLE, ALASKA
Mobil-1 5-40 turbo diesel truck oil from day #1
98 gallon transfer flow tank
Leer topper insulated
MBRP SS409 turbo back Off-Road duel exhaust-CAT IS GONE
AstroStart 2-way Auto start
Go Rhino pushbar/brushguard,4-9" Lite-Force moose lites
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 01:05 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 72
Remmy is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elemint View Post
If they do not come out with an amazing MPG engine SOON they will be sunk. They should have been working on a new Ranger a long time ago as well. We are heading for a MAJOR economic crash and Ford is not taking this into account at all. Not that they are alone...
One of those doom and gloom guys huh? Try to cut back a little on the CNN, the sky isn't falling. It's going to be O.K.
__________________
2008 F250 cc 4x4 3v V10, 2.5" Lift, 35" Toyo M/Ts on 20" Ion Alloys, Magnaflow Custom True Dual Exhaust, Troyer Performance Custom Tune, McCulloch H.I.D. Headlight Conversion, Firestone Air Bags

2007 Yukon Denali, 6.2 Liter, 6-Speed Auto, Stock
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 09:44 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: duncan oklahoma
Posts: 631
l-m tech is starting off with a positive reputation.
i heard from a feild sevice engineer that spends a lot of time in Detroit that the F-150 diesel that they have been working on is doing between 28-35 MPG and they arnt have many issues with it.gonna be nice to see this thing hit the road.
__________________
ASE MASTER TECH FORD SENIOR MASTER TECH
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 01:17 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 42
micabeau1 is starting off with a positive reputation.
deisel is $4 a gallon now.

need some kind of hybrid gasoline vehicle,

what happened to the hydraulic hybrid, a myth???

something needs to happen, lobby the government for infrastructure improvements to support alternative fuels.

look at hydrogen.

i cant believe an '09 truck is getting released with the pathetic MPGs
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 01:27 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 500
04 FX4 Lineman is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by l-m tech View Post
i heard from a feild sevice engineer that spends a lot of time in Detroit that the F-150 diesel that they have been working on is doing between 28-35 MPG and they arnt have many issues with it.gonna be nice to see this thing hit the road.
He's blowing smoke up your ass on MPG it won't be even close to those numbers, in my area deisel hit $4.30 a gal.!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 01:32 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 100
excaliber551 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by l-m tech View Post
i heard from a feild sevice engineer that spends a lot of time in Detroit that the F-150 diesel that they have been working on is doing between 28-35 MPG and they arnt have many issues with it.gonna be nice to see this thing hit the road.
Sure they are.
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 01:36 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 2,566
David85 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by micabeau1 View Post
what happened to the hydraulic hybrid, a myth???
I prefer to call it an outright fabtication. I suspect all ford ever did was make a pastel picture of it to try and get some of the attention that toyota and GM were getting when they were unveiling real hybrids (instead of fantasy). There is no way anything that weighs as much as an F150 can get 60 MPG no matter what transmission is used.

The gasoline piston engine cannot go past 22-30% efficiency in this context, and that has remaned unchanged since the model-T. Running on battery power could result in a cost equivalent of 60 MPG, but an all electric F150 ain't gonna happen.
__________________
1986 F250HD Ex cab Fresh built up 6.9L diesel Lariat AC leather seats power everything w/full cluster, sterling rear 3.08LS gears, E4OD trans, ram intake ATS 088 turbo


1986 F150 Ex cab Lariat rollercam 5.0L on LPG AOD trans 3.55 gears 390 000Ks
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 01:51 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 42
micabeau1 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David85 View Post
I prefer to call it an outright fabtication. I suspect all ford ever did was make a pastel picture of it to try and get some of the attention that toyota and GM were getting when they were unveiling real hybrids (instead of fantasy). There is no way anything that weighs as much as an F150 can get 60 MPG no matter what transmission is used.

The gasoline piston engine cannot go past 22-30% efficiency in this context, and that has remaned unchanged since the model-T. Running on battery power could result in a cost equivalent of 60 MPG, but an all electric F150 ain't gonna happen.
wasn't the hydraulic system supposed to save energy lost in when braking? I didn't know it had anything to do with the engine.
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 05:02 PM
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,182
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thorseshoeing View Post
2,700 pounds in the bed? I'd like to see what it did to your ranger...

Tim
Dont know about 2700 lbs. But I have seen 18 square bales in the back of one...
The muffler was dragging the ground too, but it didnt damage anything.
__________________
-Josh
04 F150 4.6l 2wd reg cab XL 3:55 LS SISO Flowmaster S40 NCD Customs 2.5" Leveling Kit Burner High Power Fog Lights

85 Bronco 5.8l 351w 4wd Gas Guzzler
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 05:20 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 218
fruth04 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i skipped a few pages and im gonna cut to the point, a high hp truck in diesel form CAN get very good mileage, many of us have seen the 700-800hp trucks they compare in diesel power magazine...they compared like 10-trucks all over 600hp at the tires all the way up to like 1000hp and the worst one got 15.. the best got like 22 so that leads one to believe 25 shouldnt be a problem in a halfton, HOWEVER the new e missions crap lately has been cutting 2-4mpg off what some of the current motors are capable of. the new 4.4 that is spose to be in the f150 is suppost to have a whole different system in the exhaust so it might be a turning point on the mileage going the other way...i would be blaming the epa for any lack of mileage per gallon.... not ford, ive heard up to 4mpg gains on the 6.4 powerstroke without all the emissions crap... i guess we wait...
__________________
2003 F-150.... Airaid, edge evo, piaa's, exhaust and just about all the chrome u can buy...
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 05:28 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 2,566
David85 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by micabeau1 View Post
wasn't the hydraulic system supposed to save energy lost in when braking? I didn't know it had anything to do with the engine.

Yes, that was the claim. But if its true than you should be getting 60 MPG right now (or close to it) when you are on the highway. The hydraulic hybrid still gets all its energy from the gasoline engine.

There is energy that is lost in braking and recovering it would raise the MPGs but on average 10%-15% improvement is all you will see. Gasoline - electric hybrids have used this method for years, and bettery powered cars even longer. But there will be NO improvement once at highway speeds since you don't use brakes once at cruising speed so there is no braking energy to recover.

What you have to remember is that those were ford's claims and they were not indepentantly verified. I'm not saying that the EPA test is realistic, but it is at least its the same test from one vehicle to the next giving a relative comparison. The fact that ford failed to produce a prototype makes me think that it was more or less made up.

You have to be really carefull about MPG claims on hybrid vehicles. Ford isn't the first one to fudge numbers on hybrid MPGs.
__________________
1986 F250HD Ex cab Fresh built up 6.9L diesel Lariat AC leather seats power everything w/full cluster, sterling rear 3.08LS gears, E4OD trans, ram intake ATS 088 turbo


1986 F150 Ex cab Lariat rollercam 5.0L on LPG AOD trans 3.55 gears 390 000Ks
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.

Ford-Trucks.com and Ford Truck Enthusiasts, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Ford Truck Enthusiasts, Inc., Please see our legal notices and privacy statement.