Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 3.0L V6
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2008, 03:44 PM
Econoline 150's Avatar
Econoline 150 Econoline 150 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 374
Econoline 150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question 3.0 towing experience/advice

I'm looking for a towing vehicle, it will be pulling a car trailer and a car from dealer auctions (retiree woking for cash under the table for a dealer buddy)


I found 2 Ford vans with a 300 six and a 460 which would both do well, but I'll tell you what gas is getting so out of hand lately Im wondering if I could get by with a Ranger 3.0 to do the job, would a 5 speed with that combo pull 5,000 lbs ? I was told the Aerostars had fragile auto trannies do the Rangers have the same ?
I live in flat Illinois in the boonies and hills wont be an issue.

Any advo Id appreciate guys.
__________________
Bill Lloyd

1981 Ford F250 4 x 4 351M & 4 speed
1982 Ford Econoline 300 six
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 07:54 PM
floydguy floydguy is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 55
floydguy is starting off with a positive reputation.
my neighbor has an aerostar 3.0, he bought a windstar van, and pulled it home on a dolly with the aerostar 50 miles today, no problem and this is in the flats of eastern nc. and va. , i believe the 3.0 aerostar and 3.0 rangers have the same A4LD automatic.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 09:32 PM
jokerforever jokerforever is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
jokerforever is starting off with a positive reputation.
Don’t do it! The 3.0 is a dog unloaded and I couldn’t imagine it trying to pull twice the weight they usually do. Some folks will tell you that they do but just because they haven’t killed somebody yet doesn’t mean that they won’t. At a minimal I would say you need a good ½ ton to safely pull a loaded car trailer regardless of the engine. Not only would you be dangerously slow, but a Ranger’s brakes would have to work their butts off to get that much weight stopped; even on level ground. Now 5k lbs isn’t that much but you have to remember that a Ranger only weights 4k to 5k lbs at the most. So you’re doubling or more what the chassis usually carries around. That can be done in properly setup heavy half or better but it’s not a good ideal with a light duty ¼ ton truck. I would suggest finding a F150 (or an E-series if you have your heart set on a van) with a 300 six or 351 from the late 80s to mid 90s. Stay away from the AOD and you should be fine. And full size trucks from those years are comparable in cost to Rangers. For the same price you get a lot more truck.
__________________
1965 Mustang coupe 250 six
1965 Galaxie "fastback" 390
1978 Mustang II v8-not stock-wanna race?
1978 F-150 351M 4x4-RIP-Damn Grayhairs!
1997 F-350 SRW Reg Cab 460 4x4
1998 Ranger 3.0L 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 05:08 PM
riffer riffer is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
riffer is starting off with a positive reputation.
Good Idea but the truck just does not have enough weight and brakes to be safe. I was overloading mine all of the time with a bed full of firewood and a 5x8 trailer full behind it.

I had to use full throttle much of the time to stay going and stopping was not a quick affair. Also having to rev it out all of the time that kills the gas mileage.

I finally bought a bigger truck for bigger jobs.

But I kept the ranger for buzzin around town.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2008, 10:21 PM
bigjohn1895 bigjohn1895 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
bigjohn1895 is starting off with a positive reputation.
well if you want to tow (on flat land) with a ranger with a 3.0 you can do it safely if you change the rear end to a 3.73 or 4.11 gear and make sure your brake lines are good
i tow cars all the time with mine as long as there are no steep downgrades you wont have a problem
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:53 PM
Milwaukee1979F150's Avatar
Milwaukee1979F150 Milwaukee1979F150 is online now
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 886
Milwaukee1979F150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
ranger with 4.11 won't work you need 4.30 for this.

i suggested not use ranger because we have one at work broke gear in diff that cost much to replace

You better find 90's F150 with 300 plus 5 speed you be fine.
__________________
Sorry for my bad grammar.
79 F150 4wd 4 speed Project

91 Bronco XLT 5.0L AOD. Replace intake, heads, and exhaust then install snowplow.

Currently drive 94 geo tracker until Bronco is ready.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 04:11 PM
joshc_guitar's Avatar
joshc_guitar joshc_guitar is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royse City TX
Posts: 453
joshc_guitar is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jokerforever View Post
Don’t do it! The 3.0 is a dog unloaded and I couldn’t imagine it trying to pull twice the weight they usually do. Some folks will tell you that they do but just because they haven’t killed somebody yet doesn’t mean that they won’t. At a minimal I would say you need a good ½ ton to safely pull a loaded car trailer regardless of the engine. Not only would you be dangerously slow, but a Ranger’s brakes would have to work their butts off to get that much weight stopped; even on level ground. Now 5k lbs isn’t that much but you have to remember that a Ranger only weights 4k to 5k lbs at the most. So you’re doubling or more what the chassis usually carries around. That can be done in properly setup heavy half or better but it’s not a good ideal with a light duty ¼ ton truck. I would suggest finding a F150 (or an E-series if you have your heart set on a van) with a 300 six or 351 from the late 80s to mid 90s. Stay away from the AOD and you should be fine. And full size trucks from those years are comparable in cost to Rangers. For the same price you get a lot more truck.
Now, I love my 3.0 and won't call it a dog. But, I have to agree with ihm on this. I pull my 18 foot Skeeter Bass Boat with mine quite often, but it IS hard to stop. I pulled my 72 f250 on a trailer with my dads '05 F150 and it was a b!tch I cant imagine pulling that with my Ranger.


IF you have GOOOOOOOD trailer brakes. Maybe. The engine can take it and the chassis would be OK-ish. But the braking power is what worries me. And you might ry to find a 4.0 just to be safe. A 4x4 4.0 Ranger with the beefier frame and suspention would be alright if you have trailer brakes. But even a 3.0 is going to get bad mpg pulling a trailer. I hauled computers around with a 15 foot trailer for awhile with mine and was alright but thats not comparible to 5000k worth of car.
__________________
2005 Mustang GT


2001 Lightning - Gone
1973 F250 390fe - Gone
2000 Ranger 3.0 - Gone
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.