Quote:
Originally Posted by jokerforever
Don’t do it! The 3.0 is a dog unloaded and I couldn’t imagine it trying to pull twice the weight they usually do. Some folks will tell you that they do but just because they haven’t killed somebody yet doesn’t mean that they won’t. At a minimal I would say you need a good ½ ton to safely pull a loaded car trailer regardless of the engine. Not only would you be dangerously slow, but a Ranger’s brakes would have to work their butts off to get that much weight stopped; even on level ground. Now 5k lbs isn’t that much but you have to remember that a Ranger only weights 4k to 5k lbs at the most. So you’re doubling or more what the chassis usually carries around. That can be done in properly setup heavy half or better but it’s not a good ideal with a light duty ¼ ton truck. I would suggest finding a F150 (or an E-series if you have your heart set on a van) with a 300 six or 351 from the late 80s to mid 90s. Stay away from the AOD and you should be fine. And full size trucks from those years are comparable in cost to Rangers. For the same price you get a lot more truck.
|
Now, I love my 3.0 and won't call it a dog. But, I have to agree with ihm on this. I pull my 18 foot Skeeter Bass Boat with mine quite often, but it IS hard to stop. I pulled my 72 f250 on a trailer with my dads '05 F150 and it was a b!tch I cant imagine pulling that with my Ranger.
IF you have GOOOOOOOD trailer brakes. Maybe. The engine can take it and the chassis would be OK-ish. But the braking power is what worries me. And you might ry to find a 4.0 just to be safe. A 4x4 4.0 Ranger with the beefier frame and suspention would be alright if you have trailer brakes. But even a 3.0 is going to get bad mpg pulling a trailer. I hauled computers around with a 15 foot trailer for awhile with mine and was alright but thats not comparible to 5000k worth of car.