Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
 
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > General Diesel Discussion
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

General Diesel Discussion





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2008, 06:39 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eat me
Posts: 2,190
BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.
It shares many of the same qualities as the 350 diesel. Rushed to production, massive problems with the torque to yeild head bolts, destroying the reputation of the Powerstroke like the 350 did to diesel in general. About the only thing that could make them more similar is if the 6.0 didn't have a water separator.

In this fleet we don't have anything newer. After the problems we've had, we didn't buy any more. It is seriously at least 1 problem a month with either one of these ambulances related to the engine. We just entered into a class action suit against Ford with EMS providers from across the country over this engine.

At a place where I used to volunteer, we did have an 05 in an E450. (The ones above are F450s) It has also had non stop problems, however I don't think it has lifted the heads yet. But lots of smoking and no power problems. There's a steep ramp out of the ambulance bay there and it has not been able to climb it on more than one occassion. They are considering replacing it and keeping the 96 backup that has had very few problems.

Oh and the 05 makes about 1200 runs per year and the 04 twins make about 2500 runs per year apiece.

That 6.4 though has been an awesome engine and has only had the radiator leak problem that the very early 08s had.

Mike

Edit: I know that in general the newer models have less problems but most people also say that if you have the older ones fixed then they don't have problems anymore.

I kid you not that the one 04 gets head gaskets more than tires. Five times in about 68K miles. That's unacceptable and I can not recommend this engine to anyone. That doesn't take into account new heads, turbo, injectors, etc.
__________________
2000 F150 5.4 4R70W 4x4 Supercab 3.55 gears
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2008, 07:57 PM
diesel_dan's Avatar
FTE Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cool, CA
Posts: 996
diesel_dan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I've owned both and didn't/haven't had a problem with either, but I've got a very late 6.0 and not a lot of miles on it. The 7.3 stock feels like dog, I put a very mild programmer on it -- mostly to crisp up the shifts and it was a night and day difference (tho every intake related fitting had to be tightened after the tuner was added!). Driving my 7.3 to the dealer and test driving a 6.0 was a real experience. when I got back into my mildly tuned 7.3, it felt as if the pedal had to go half way to the floor to get the truck to move. Yes the 6.0 is that much faster and it does the same with a load -- it will dust a 7.3 in all conditions, including mileage (I've gotten as much as 2 mpg more loaded doing the exact same thing in my 6.0 as my 7.3, and up to 4 more when empty).

Nobody has menting the transmission. A torqshift trans is such a huge upgrade that even if you bough a V-10 gasser out of fear of a possible problem with a 6.0, it'd be worth it to get the TS over the 7.3's trans (I know I'm gonna' get trashed for that one!).

You asked about the '05+ front suspension and nobody has answered that one: stretch your budget and get an '05. It is another huge improvement, both in ride/offroad compliance and hardiness over the '04-. Plus the '05+ 6.0s have really been the best of the 6.0s -- sure there are complaints, but far fewer than prior years.

And back to that V-10 thang. I'd rather see you with a gasser Ford than stay in, or get another GM. I was there on the darkside ('05 LLY Dmax/ally) and it was one POS, and not just because it overheated on even a slightly warm day...

Go Ford and go Late 6.0!!!
__________________
'07 F350 SRW SC/LB, 6.0 PSD/Auto, 4x4 -- SuperHitch w/ custom 16" SuperTruss, Tork Lift Camper Tie-Downs, Rancho RS 9000X Shocks, Air Lift Air Springs, BFG A/Ts 305/65/18E, GO Industries Mud Flaps.

'00 Expedition 5.4 4x4 Eddie Bauer -- Bone Stock
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2008, 08:32 PM
Benchwrench's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 574
Benchwrench is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Haven't read much of the replies but here's what I noticed.

Coming from a 7.3 I can say this about the difference..

-best fuel economy;
I found the 7.3 with 3.55 (upgraded) gearing (4x4) to get 22 mpg.
The 6.0 with (stock) 3.73 gears (4x4) to get 20 mpg.

The 7.3 is going to feel like "blah" diesel power compared to the 6.0.
The 6.0 can do circles around the proven 444 performance wise. It is so much more of an advanced diesel engine you can't really compare the two.
Going to the 6.0 you will get a transmission that you wish you always had.
the front suspension choices are leaf spring or coil spring. The coils will give you better turning radius, ride characteristics and will accept larger tires.
If you can get a 2005 or newer you will find over 400 upgrades to suspension, frame
and other refinements over the 2004 model
My vote would be to hold out for a 6.0! in any trim level. Unless you are fine with a farm truck.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 12:23 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eat me
Posts: 2,190
BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.
I will say that the Torqshift is one of the best transmissions I've ever used. So far we haven't had any problems with them in a very abusive environment. Night and day difference from the 4R100. I think that it's a lot of the difference between the 6.0 and the 7.3. Personally, I wouldn't have a 7.3 without a manual trans.

Stock the 6.0 is marginally reliable at best. Tuned, it's like playing with fire in a gasoline puddle. At least the 7.3 can be chipped up to stock 6.0 power and huges amounts of torque and still be reliable.

I'm still going to say get the 7.3 or 6.4. I wanted to like the 6.0 from the moment I first heard about it. But every time I think that the problems are worked out, another one blows up around me. Every upgrade in the world won't help you if the truck is in the shop with engine problems.

Mike
__________________
2000 F150 5.4 4R70W 4x4 Supercab 3.55 gears
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 03:31 PM
miller_feed's Avatar
Hook it, I'll pull it.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Grand Lake, la.
Posts: 5,356
miller_feed is a splendid one to beholdmiller_feed is a splendid one to beholdmiller_feed is a splendid one to beholdmiller_feed is a splendid one to beholdmiller_feed is a splendid one to beholdmiller_feed is a splendid one to beholdmiller_feed is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinxie
Well, I have decided to get rid of my 03 GMC crew cab. It is just too problematic....
I took a few Ford F250 and F350's (2005) for a test drive and loved they way they drove. My price range is going to get me a truck in the 2002-2004 range for a Diesel crew cab 4x4 w/leather. I dont haul or pull lots, but during the summer I pull a 5th wheel camper occationally. I also pull a car trailer occasionally too for about 200 mile trips.
What should i lean towards as far as engines go? I have heard the 6.0L has injector problems. Is this true? What else should be a factor?
Usually there are concerns or bugs with a new engine. What were the issues when the 6.0 came out?
Thanks for the help!!
Why are you talking about 05' -07' 6.0 and v-10? The OP said he could only look in the 02' - 04' range for a Diesel. I say go with the 7.3 instead of the 6.0 in this year range.
__________________
RICK, PAA MEMBER #4
2001, F-350, DRW. CC. LWB, 4X4, LARIAT,
MODS: 6637 W/Pete's filter cover, BTS-VB, DP-TUNER- stock, 40t, 60t, 80e, 140s, HI, OBA, 203*, billet housing, IH bolts, MBRP 4" SS, Isspro 3 gauge kit, Zoodad, Foil delete, TN-BB turbo, Bellowed up pipes, HPX, TRU-COOL cooler. For now.
Jim, Roland, Will, JD? I want to go somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 03:38 PM
diesel_dan's Avatar
FTE Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cool, CA
Posts: 996
diesel_dan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by miller_feed
Why are you talking about 05' -07' 6.0 and v-10? The OP said he could only look in the 02' - 04' range for a Diesel. I say go with the 7.3 instead of the 6.0 in this year range.
He also asked about the '05+ front 4x4 suspension, and there's alot more to the '05+ than just that. I still say stretch the budget and go '05+...
__________________
'07 F350 SRW SC/LB, 6.0 PSD/Auto, 4x4 -- SuperHitch w/ custom 16" SuperTruss, Tork Lift Camper Tie-Downs, Rancho RS 9000X Shocks, Air Lift Air Springs, BFG A/Ts 305/65/18E, GO Industries Mud Flaps.

'00 Expedition 5.4 4x4 Eddie Bauer -- Bone Stock
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 03:43 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 860
scottman70 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLK94F150
It shares many of the same qualities as the 350 diesel. Rushed to production, massive problems with the torque to yeild head bolts, destroying the reputation of the Powerstroke like the 350 did to diesel in general. About the only thing that could make them more similar is if the 6.0 didn't have a water separator.
You got me thinking...........My 1983 6.2 diesel lived a long 250k mile life. My 6.2 went into the shop a total of 4 times in those ammount of miles, and 2 of those were for the tranny. Crap, I cannot believe that my 6.2 POS diesel was more reliable than my 6.0 power stroke that has only 51k on it! Pathetic!

P.S. Maybe I should not only say go with the 7.3 but maybe you should also consider a 6.2 instead of the 6.0.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 04:05 PM
FTE/PARTS-GUY's Avatar
FTE Sponsor
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 892
FTE/PARTS-GUY has a good reputation on FTE.FTE/PARTS-GUY has a good reputation on FTE.FTE/PARTS-GUY has a good reputation on FTE.
7.3L

Ed
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 07:07 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NJ where fun comes to die
Posts: 2,935
trike1946 has a good reputation on FTE.trike1946 has a good reputation on FTE.trike1946 has a good reputation on FTE.
I was faced with the same choice. I went with the 7.3. I know what I have versus I don't know what I have. All my others are 7.3 so I am in familiar territory.
__________________
Bob
96 E350, 7.3 PSD, Auto
97 E Super Duty, 7.3 PSD, Auto
90 E350, 7.3 IDI Diesel, Auto
99 Expedition 4.6, 4x4
2001 F250 SD 7.3, 4x4, CC, LB, SRW, Auto
2001 F350 SD 7.3, 4x4, CC, LB, DRW, Auto
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 08:40 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB Canada
Posts: 75
jinxie is starting off with a positive reputation.
The reason I asked about the 05 was becasue i was wondering if it was worth the extra dollars saved up on a suspension upgrade. I figured that any bugs with the 6.0 would have been worked out at the factory the 3rd year into production. I have to say i dont like what I hear on the 6.0!! I did like to power of the 05, can I achieve that same power with a 7.3? What is the power and torque of each engine? I believe the 05 I took out for a drive was 325hp.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 09:17 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 860
scottman70 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinxie
The reason I asked about the 05 was becasue i was wondering if it was worth the extra dollars saved up on a suspension upgrade. I figured that any bugs with the 6.0 would have been worked out at the factory the 3rd year into production. I have to say i dont like what I hear on the 6.0!! I did like to power of the 05, can I achieve that same power with a 7.3? What is the power and torque of each engine? I believe the 05 I took out for a drive was 325hp.
Thanks
You absolutely can get the 7.3 up to 325 and 600 torque with an exhaust, air kit and programmer.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 09:42 PM
UGA33's Avatar
Yeah Come On!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cartersville, Ga
Posts: 1,203
UGA33 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
But if you are doing any towing with your truck, the tow command system on the 05 and up is worth the extra money. Its the only way to tow. IMHO
__________________
2006 F-250 Lariat Crew Cab Shortbed FX4
-Josh-
*6.0L PSD*MBRP Turbo-back*35" BFG Mud Terr. KM2's*Leveling Kit w/ Daystar Coil Spacers & Rancho RS5000's*Spartanized SCT X3*Autometer EGT & Tranny guages*Coolant Filter*CCV Reroute*F-350 blocks*High Idle Mod
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 10:56 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eat me
Posts: 2,190
BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.
IMO the 6.0 is the only thing wrong with the 05+ trucks.

The 7.3 can achieve stock 6.0 HP and more than 600-700ft/lbs of torque and still be totally reliable. It's just that the stock auto isn't the best. But if you either get a manual or upgrade the tranny, the 7.3 trucks can't be beat.

Or spend the extra bucks for a 6.4. They are everything that the 6.0 was supposed to be and wasn't.

Mike
__________________
2000 F150 5.4 4R70W 4x4 Supercab 3.55 gears
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 03:46 AM
Benchwrench's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 574
Benchwrench is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
what I liked about the 7.3 was it seemed bullet proof yet civilized. Unlike a tuned 6. Oh!
with the 7.3 I could run the pedal to the floor all day and it would always scoot up to speed and give me all she had. Maybe since the truck was stock except for some dealer computer upgrade giving me a tad more fuel, the engine was very predictable and the truck was solid as a rock flying down the highway.
I actually miss that ol' beast. Manual trans. and all/
however I wouldn't GO back to one after tasting the 6. Oh My!

You'll be tickled no matter what you get because it will be all yours.
-Have fun.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 04:29 PM
RDJ184's Avatar
FTE Chapter Leader
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: EDGEWOOD
Posts: 3,447
RDJ184 is a splendid one to beholdRDJ184 is a splendid one to beholdRDJ184 is a splendid one to beholdRDJ184 is a splendid one to beholdRDJ184 is a splendid one to beholdRDJ184 is a splendid one to behold
lot of opinions its all about what you want i have 06 6.0 love that damn truck30,000 on her now and not problem one
__________________
JOIN NEW MEXICO CHAPTER HERE!


RANDY 06 6.0 4X4
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.