Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > 335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2001, 12:19 PM
79fordslug 79fordslug is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 118
79fordslug is starting off with a positive reputation.
351m EGR

I am going to install a 4bbl carb and performance intake on my truck. the current set up has EGR with the carbon canister and the lines going all over. I want to pull all the EGR out including the carbon canister to simplify the engine and to gain more vacuum pressure. Should I pull it off and can I just block holes in the intake, carb, and gas tank? or should I leave it on and match it to my performance intake?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2001, 01:54 PM
firstonraceday's Avatar
firstonraceday firstonraceday is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: East Texas
Posts: 728
firstonraceday is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
351m EGR

I think you will need to stay with the EGR. I have seen spacer plates in the Summit catalog. Taking it out, I believe, will increase pinging and negatively affect performance. I have a 351M in a 1977 F-250 and the spacer will get partially blocked with carbon periodically. When this happens, it will ping no matter the octane grade of gasoline. Someone with more familiarity with this engine design may have a different but, if everything is currently intact as far as the system, I would leave it in.
__________________
Jason

2005 F-150 XLT SuperCrew, 5.4 w/Auto, 3.55LS
1993 F-150 300 I-6 w/5-Speed (Traded for the above 8/6/2005)
1977 F-250 351M w/T-18 (Rebuilt at 315,000 Miles)
2008 Escape Limited w/3.0L V-6 (Wife's)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2001, 05:36 PM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2 Franklin2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Staunton VA
Posts: 32,435
Franklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant futureFranklin2 has a brilliant future
351m EGR

If you go with an afermarket non-emission carb, you can do away with the egr. firstonraceday is correct about pinging IF you keep the original emission carb. Do not plug the line from the gas tank. This is a vent line and needs to be open. You may get a gas smell from this, but there's nothing else to do since the gas cap is sealed and the fuel tank needs to get air from somewhere to replace the fuel when the engine uses it. One recommendation I have is to keep the original air cleaner and tube going to the exhaust manifold. This will help driveability when it is cold.
__________________
Dave F

1989 F250 XLT Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2001, 11:26 PM
bubbaf250's Avatar
bubbaf250 bubbaf250 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: (near) Denver USA
Posts: 1,127
bubbaf250 is starting off with a positive reputation.
351m EGR

>I am going to install a
>4bbl carb and performance intake
>on my truck. the
>current set up has EGR
>with the carbon canister and
>the lines going all over.

79fordslug,

The carbon canister is not related to the EGR; it is part of the evaporative (EVAP) emissions control system. It's purpose is to capture fuel vapors from the fuel tank(s) and the carb bowl in the carbon canister when the engine is not running, then burn them off each time the engine reaches operating temperature. The EVAP system has no affect on performance.

> I want to pull
>all the EGR out including
>the carbon canister to simplify
>the engine and to gain
>more vacuum pressure.

Unless you have leaky vacuum switches or hoses, the EGR and EVAP systems should have no affect on manifold vacuum.

>Should
>I pull it off and
>can I just block holes
>in the intake, carb, and
>gas tank?

The EGR system on M-block engines (351M/400) consists of exhaust passages in the intake manifold, an adapter plate under the carb, and vacuum operated the EGR valve itself. The carb has no EGR ports or fittings.

You can disable the EGR by simply plugging off the vacuum hose that operates the EGR valve. If you disable the EGR, you must tune the carburetor to operate correctly without EGR (i.e., enrich the mixture). EGR allows excessively lean mixtures to be run without pinging.

>or should I
>leave it on and match
>it to my performance intake?

For future emissions compatibility (even if you decide to disable the EGR), I suggest an EGR-type manifold, like the ones provided by Edelbrock and Weiand. If you choose the Edelbrock manifold, their EGR manifold's carb mounting pad is much better than the one on the non-EGR manifold.

BubbaF250

1980 F250 4x4 Custom, 351M/NP435/NP208/D44HD-TTB/D60-FF/3.55s 6750 GVW, Rust & White.
__________________
2006 F350 4x4 XLT, CCSB, 6.0L/5R110W
1980 F250 4x4 Custom, 351M/NP435/NP208/D44HD-TTB/D60-FF
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2001, 01:44 AM
GT40man GT40man is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Jax FL
Posts: 887
GT40man is starting off with a positive reputation.
351m EGR

bubbaf250 is right, get the edelbrock egr manifold and id op for the 4 bbl egr spacer.
__________________
Just your average 500hp 400C.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2001, 01:02 AM
Bull Bull is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Denver USA
Posts: 352
Bull is starting off with a positive reputation.
351m EGR

I have my EGR disabled (EGR valve vacume hose disconnected with EGR block plate in) on my 400 and don't have any pinging problems with 85 oct gas. I bought Edelbrock non-EGR intake manifold as it'll get rid of the whole EGR system for cleaner look. I'd test to see if your engine will ping with EGR disabled, and if it doesn't, go for it!
__________________
Bull

1988 Ford Bronco w/ 302
1978 Ford F250 w/ 400
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-21-2001, 12:35 PM
jwtaylor jwtaylor is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,496
jwtaylor is starting off with a positive reputation.
351m EGR

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2010, 10:20 AM
hummer1bronco hummer1bronco is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1
hummer1bronco is starting off with a positive reputation.
Smile

Hello am new at this

am helping my son fix his 1980 bronco and need a dirgam for 1980 ford bronco 351m emision for the vacum lines
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2010, 10:20 AM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines & Troubleshooting > 335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland

Tags
1977, 1980, 351m, 54, 66, adapter, block, canisters, carb, egr, ford, function, intake, motor, system, tune, vapor

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup