Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2008, 02:16 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton, Va
Posts: 255
tseekins is starting off with a positive reputation.
Lightbulb Consumer reports April 2008

I got may consumer reports yesterday in the mail and have been spending a lazy Sunday reading all about the new vehicle reviews. I skipped all the blah blah crap about sedans and crossovers and went right to the meat of the magazine. Trucks and SUV's. I almost had an orgasm when I read that the Tundra V-8 4X4 was no longer a CR recommended truck because of lower than average reliablity ratings. As was the case for Nissans two V-8's and all of GM's full size SUV's. The Chevy and GMC trucks barely squeaked by with a CR nod even though thier reliabilty figures were below average.

FMC showed the highest reliabilty ratings across the vehicle line-up of the big three. Naturally Chrysler came in dead last with GM a hair ahead of them.

The F-150 and Expy did very well.

The "08 SD seems to be under tougher scrutiny since the 6.0L debacle of the past few years. The tree hugging liberals at CR seem to think the SD rides to rough, has poor road manners and won't stop well enough. It may be true, I don't own one. A Peterbilt has the same problems. I'm sure most of these "green" liberals drive some sort of a tiny hybrid. I say, put a minute mount plow on the front or a tri-axle trailer on the back of one of thier eco-boxes and see what happens. These fools seem to think that a heavy duty truck should have the manners as a town car and the mileage of a Focus. I did find it interesting however that according to thier tests, the average fuel mileage for the diesels ranged about 13 mpg overall with Ford being slightly less.
They hate us!

Tim
   
__________________
Retired Coasty
Country Boy from Stockton Springs, Maine
'04 Expedition ( Family Car)
'99 Taurus. Former family car
'88 F-150 4x4 XLT Lariat 5.8L 5Spd
'90 Honda Civic (daughter's car) 37 mpg
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2008, 03:08 PM
builtfordtough13's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 784
builtfordtough13 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Overall that is a lot better than they used to give us, you forgot to mention that the V-6 Camary is not longer reccommended and the all models of the Fusion are.
__________________
Jake

Mine: 1994 F-150 4x4 Supercab, 351, E4OD, Light Santa Fe Clearcoat/Medium Polomino Accent 155,000 miles

Dad's: 2004 Expedition Eddie Bauer White/Gold 4x2 Every option except Nav 52,000 miles

Mom's: 2001 Focus SE Sport, 2.0L Zetec Fort Knox Gold 131,000 miles



Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2008, 05:44 PM
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,345
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
If they had some people that actualy new what that truck was built for then they would realize how good the brakes are. Yesterday Dad pulled our 35ft montanna with no trailer brakes because the plug-in broke, down the road to dump it and it stopped just fine (speed didnt go higher than about 30). I think that the brakes are fantastic and the truck stops very good for a crew cab long bed truck.
__________________
-Josh
04 F150 4.6l 2wd reg cab XL 3:55 LS SISO Flowmaster S40 NCD Customs 2.5" Leveling Kit Burner High Power Fog Lights

85 Bronco 5.8l 351w 4wd Gas Guzzler
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:53 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hewitt, Minnesota
Posts: 800
Old Rust Bucket is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
In Farm Show Magizine not that long ago I guy said a 2005 Dodge 2500 was his worst buy. He said it road rough and was hard on fuel. He said he traded it for an F-150 of similar vintage and has been happy with the switch.


....................HERE'S YOUR SIGN.........
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2008, 10:14 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Niantic, CT
Posts: 488
keyul is starting off with a positive reputation.
Go ford! It's good to see that they are finally getting the credit they deserve.
__________________
Kyle
'98 f150 4x4 off-road reg. cab shortbed stepside 4.6 v8 xlt (wrecked)
'79 f150 2wd, reg. cab long bed, 300I6 4 spd. (still runnin strong)
'84 f150 4x4 reg. cab shortbed stepside fiberglass dually fenders 300I6 4spd. (sold)
'79 f150 4x4 reg cab short bed 351m 4spd (sold, thank goodness!)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy