Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
 
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > 2008 - 2009 6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

2008 - 2009 6.4L Power Stroke Diesel





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 07:06 PM
Demolition's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Land O Lakes, Fl.
Posts: 162
Demolition is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by barry1me
haha want to know the specific numbers with a DPF vs without......simple answer ~300rwhp with DPF and so far ~500RWHP without. For those that think they can run much of a tune and retain the DPF....they have another thing coming. DPF will fail at a tremdous rate when ran with a significent tune. FACT!
Define significant tune, and the source of your FACT please. At what horsepower, torque, air/fuel ratio do DPFs fail at a tremendous rate?

Thanks Matt. I would be interested in your product and would personally love to delete the DPF. Appreciate the straight answer as well. Please let me/us know when it's ready!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #47 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2008, 08:55 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,076
duramaximizer is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SID297
Do you have any idea, estimate, how much of a restriction the dpf is?
If you are wanting to know on a stock tune how much the difference was just taking the DPF off, probably nothing. Just a minimal gain in fuel mileage since you can pull out the post injection fuel injection cycle.

On Edit, I don't know if killing the DPF is possible, but smokey tunes will make it want to regenerate all the time. Which may kill it .... one would need to know how many cycles a DPF is good for.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 02:29 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 84
SID297 is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
I would think just a proper tune (not a smoky one) with a dpf delete would pick up quite a bit of power. I'm also interested to see how much power is picked up by getting rid of the egr.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 03:09 AM
NickFordMan's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 2,194
NickFordMan is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
That is extremely impressive for a completely stock engine to be tuned to that level. I've never driven the 6.4L...but I heard some lackluster reports about the engine's performance. It goes without saying that if someone was to run this tune regularly or even often that other modifications will be needed, but simply being able to produce that amount of power with a completely stock engine is amazing!
__________________
Built Ford Tough
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 09:04 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 71
barry1me is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demolition
Define significant tune, and the source of your FACT please. At what horsepower, torque, air/fuel ratio do DPFs fail at a tremendous rate?

Thanks Matt. I would be interested in your product and would personally love to delete the DPF. Appreciate the straight answer as well. Please let me/us know when it's ready!
Any tune that creates more soot then stock calibration will reduce the longevity of the DPF. As mentioned below you will be going into active regen considerably more due to the increase in soot build up. DPFs have a life cycle and the life cycle for the 6.4L was based upon stock calibration. Considering the warranty on the 6.4L exhaust is 100K typically life cycle is 50% more then the warranty cycle. Every OE's design requirements are different. Where did the facts come from? I design DPF's DOC's and converters for a living so I have a bit of knowledge when it comes to the effects of calibration. DPF life is directly proportional to the calibration used on the drivetrain. Considering ford is having a lot of DPF warranty claims in the stock tuning....aftermarket tuning will increase the DPF failure exponentially. Matt (spartan tech) can Vouch for this we talk quite frequently. I am all for what Matt is doing I think its great. If Matt or anyone else didnt figure out how to remove the regen cycles you can kiss doing any serious modding to the 6.4L goodbye.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 11:26 AM
Demolition's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Land O Lakes, Fl.
Posts: 162
Demolition is starting off with a positive reputation.
I see your point. You are saying that pretty much any tune that increases HP and TQ requires a greater fuel volume and then would increase soot. More soot obviously would create more regens. More regens would mean a shorter life cycle for the DPF. Makes sense so a DPF delete with a tune that curbs the regen cycle is the way to go.
I am not a fan of the DPF in that it probably restricts MPG and Power, but I am pretty glad my new truck doesn't smoke like my old one. Guess there is no happy medium.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:50 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 71
barry1me is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demolition
I see your point. You are saying that pretty much any tune that increases HP and TQ requires a greater fuel volume and then would increase soot. More soot obviously would create more regens. More regens would mean a shorter life cycle for the DPF. Makes sense so a DPF delete with a tune that curbs the regen cycle is the way to go.
I am not a fan of the DPF in that it probably restricts MPG and Power, but I am pretty glad my new truck doesn't smoke like my old one. Guess there is no happy medium.
you got it bro. These trucks without the DPF and a mild tune do not smoke that bad at all. Here is my 'old' 6.0L with just and SCT Looney tune. I consider this minor smoke

Here is a bit more from my buddy rob
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 01:15 PM
Demolition's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Land O Lakes, Fl.
Posts: 162
Demolition is starting off with a positive reputation.
Haha! Nice vids! Yeah, comparatively, yours smokes a whole lot less.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 01:48 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 71
barry1me is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demolition
Haha! Nice vids! Yeah, comparatively, yours smokes a whole lot less.
lol for sure...he has 225 injectors, VGT-SS turbo, stacks, Nex nitrous, and FASS 150 fuel system.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 03:06 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 87
SVT03 is starting off with a positive reputation.
good numbers! have you guys got to drive it around an see what the fuel mileage is? I am assuming much better without the dpf and a good tune...
__________________
00-250- 8" fabtech, 38x15.5x20 DC rad-II, Air-raid, 4" straight, CCV, 6.0 IC, BTS vb, 6.0 Trans cooler, DP 60t, 80e, 120r, HPX, Hutch


03-cobra- 2.6kb, 3.5 & 2.75 pulley, catless x, bassani, 12" K&N, Accufab, Spec 3+, H&R Race, MM sub, Pro 5.0, lfp dp, SCT RWTD, dynotune n2o, prostars

08 LT-R450- cb, full yosh rs5, lid removed
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 09:26 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
BrightRedFord is starting off with a positive reputation.
Smile Better MPG and Performance

I just got back from a 1000 mile highway trip with my 2008 6.4 F-350 3.73 gears 4X4 crew cab with 6000 miles and driving 78 mph with the cruise on I got 14.7 mpg and this is figured long hand. This is a big improvement over stock form. I have a 150 hp Spartan diesel flash, removed the DPF and catalytic converter and has stock air box. It has alot better performance and fuel economy. All with very little smoke and it sounds real good, not too loud or annoying. It's the way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 09:44 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 661
kimminau2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Most if not all threads I have read from peeps that had put a tune on, stated they were getting better mpg even with the dpf on. If you are getting better mpg you are burning less fuel. Less fuel burned should mean less soot in the dpf.
__________________
2008 F450 King Ranch, 4.88's and everything except rear DVD.
2006 F250 King Ranch V-10, 4.56 gears, 46 gal transferflow tank, 2-1/2" DR lift, 35" Procomp extreme AT tires, SCT tuner, Firestone Ride-Rite air bags.
2000 Excursion 4x4 V-10
2007 Expedition EL, Eddie Bauer, loaded.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 12:45 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 87
SVT03 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrightRedFord
I just got back from a 1000 mile highway trip with my 2008 6.4 F-350 3.73 gears 4X4 crew cab with 6000 miles and driving 78 mph with the cruise on I got 14.7 mpg and this is figured long hand. This is a big improvement over stock form. I have a 150 hp Spartan diesel flash, removed the DPF and catalytic converter and has stock air box. It has alot better performance and fuel economy. All with very little smoke and it sounds real good, not too loud or annoying. It's the way to go.

Once you get an intake on there you will probly be up over 15... and its not even broke in yet! I think my 00 will be turning into an 09 in the near future...
__________________
00-250- 8" fabtech, 38x15.5x20 DC rad-II, Air-raid, 4" straight, CCV, 6.0 IC, BTS vb, 6.0 Trans cooler, DP 60t, 80e, 120r, HPX, Hutch


03-cobra- 2.6kb, 3.5 & 2.75 pulley, catless x, bassani, 12" K&N, Accufab, Spec 3+, H&R Race, MM sub, Pro 5.0, lfp dp, SCT RWTD, dynotune n2o, prostars

08 LT-R450- cb, full yosh rs5, lid removed
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2008, 02:17 PM
gopedoligist's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: los gatos
Posts: 441
gopedoligist is starting off with a positive reputation.
brightredford, get that intake!! a tuner cant live up to its full potential without an intake. check out s&b. good on performance and the wallet!
__________________
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/members/gopedoligist.html
keep it ford
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 02-24-2008, 06:55 PM
SANDDEMON08's Avatar
FORD POWERSTROKE JUNKY
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 836
SANDDEMON08 has a good reputation on FTE.SANDDEMON08 has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimminau2
Most if not all threads I have read from peeps that had put a tune on, stated they were getting better mpg even with the dpf on. If you are getting better mpg you are burning less fuel. Less fuel burned should mean less soot in the dpf.
Simply stated a tuner will yeild better fuel milage if you dont change your driving habits and drive conservative. If you have a heavy foot your milage will go down hill.
__________________
Got beer ? 498HP 965
2008 F350 SD CC FX4 ON 20's, 6.4 PSD,TORQ-SHIFT,3.73 REARS, NAV, BLACK LEATHER SEATS,DASH DAQ GAUGES, AFE STAGE II INTAKE,SPEARCO INTERCOOLER,CUSTOM TUNING, SEIC MOD,AMP REASEARCH STEPS, LINE-X SPRAY IN BED LINER, T-REX BILLET SIDE VENTS.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.