Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
 
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide and Water/Methanol Injection
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2008, 09:17 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 39
BlueOval460 is starting off with a positive reputation.
water/methanol nozzle sizing

i am rebuilding my 93 5.0 n/a in my f150 with a little more compression slightly bigger cam and i was going to advance the timing (valve and ignition) a good bit but i would like to be able to run 87 or 91 octane without detonation so i figure that i could run water injection to keep it from pinging, what size nozzle(s) should i use? should i go with port injection or could i get the same or near the same results with one single large nozzle?
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 10:22 AM
mrpositraction's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 328
mrpositraction is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Never understood why people would spend the money to build and engine but then not run good fuel. Run premium all the time PERIOD. Depending on methanol injection is just asking for trouble, that bottle runs out, then what? Set it up right, or suffer the consequences!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-2008, 10:17 PM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 39
BlueOval460 is starting off with a positive reputation.
First let me say that i appreciate your opinion, but from what i have read just glancing over some sites and from some of the classes i actually paid attention to in school, there isnt much difference in the btu's of energy in regular and premium (actually Regular gasoline has more btu's than aviation fuel which is 100 octane ,(125K:120K), you make the power from the compression, timing, and or boost that makes you use the higher octane fuel. So therefore by using water injection you can use lower octane fuel and make more power. not trying to be a smart *** and definately not saying that i know alot about water injection (thats why i originally posted) but those are the reasons i have considered for using water injection but like you say if the bottle runs out then i'd be screwed but i would probably use a rather large tank say a couple of gallons and i would check it regularly and have a gauge to monitor the water pressure, weight isnt an issue as its going to be in a 4x4 "almost" daily driven truck, not tryin to make any enemies just stating my reasoning
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2008, 09:39 AM
mrpositraction's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 328
mrpositraction is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueOval460
First let me say that i appreciate your opinion, but from what i have read just glancing over some sites and from some of the classes i actually paid attention to in school, there isnt much difference in the btu's of energy in regular and premium (actually Regular gasoline has more btu's than aviation fuel which is 100 octane ,(125K:120K), you make the power from the compression, timing, and or boost that makes you use the higher octane fuel. So therefore by using water injection you can use lower octane fuel and make more power. not trying to be a smart *** and definately not saying that i know alot about water injection (thats why i originally posted) but those are the reasons i have considered for using water injection but like you say if the bottle runs out then i'd be screwed but i would probably use a rather large tank say a couple of gallons and i would check it regularly and have a gauge to monitor the water pressure, weight isnt an issue as its going to be in a 4x4 "almost" daily driven truck, not tryin to make any enemies just stating my reasoning
No enemies here, this forum is for both parties to learn and have an adult conversation. The small amount of BTU gain you are going to see is neither worth the risk of the water/methonal injection. It is not just the running out either, you have a pump to worry about, and you have a very very fine nozzle where small debris can easily get stuck and clog. Also, the higher octane, which I am sure you know, is more of concern in its regards to anti-knock. It has built in what you are trying to accomplish with lower octane combined with and water/methanol injection system.

Good luck with either route and keep us posted.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 03:59 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
Bamfster is starting off with a positive reputation.
I'm putting a water/meth together for my truck (diesel) and I will also try it on my N2O injected bracket car. I found this site: http://oilburners.net/articles/splash.htm. Not that this is the way to put one together but some good info none the less.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.