Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #121 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 04:21 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 413
tjthegreat is starting off with a positive reputation.
there aint nothing wrong with the hemis just dodge has a crappy tranny
Reply With Quote
  #122 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 05:10 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
Lead Head is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Funny you say that the dodge is stupid because of the chrome rims, since most of the new rams I see around here seem to lack them. I've seen plenty of F-150s riding around on super thin side walls as well, and to act like ford isn't into the chrome game is hilarious. Guess you haven't seen the 2008 Super Duties yet :P
Reply With Quote
  #123 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 07:04 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 50
heathk2003 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by B's FX4
yea, try and pull a real heavy trailer with a dodge and those thin ass sidewall tires and see how far down the road you get....dodge is to worried about getting their chrome rims dirty to do any pulling/work!! On the job sites im on all i see are ford and chevy....very rarely a dodge and a few of the ones ive seen have been stuck because of those stupid tires they put on em!
If i was to pull a real heavy trailer then i wouldn't have bought a 1500. If i wanted a work truck then i would have got a 2500 or 3500 with a cummins. Fact of the matter is i didn't want an industrial type truck and i like my chrome wheels clean. Is it so hard for people to understand that not everyone with a truck is on a construction crew?
Reply With Quote
  #124 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 07:13 PM
Ryan50hrl's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,297
Ryan50hrl has a good reputation on FTE.Ryan50hrl has a good reputation on FTE.Ryan50hrl has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head
Funny you say that the dodge is stupid because of the chrome rims,

Hey now...i'm tried and true ford blue and i've got chrome wheels on my 07 Lariat....and i intend to get bigger 20 inch chrome wheels on it soon.....i need a truck....I just don't need 15 inch steel rims...
__________________
2007 Lariat screw - tri coat met - chrome package - Black leather captains chairs - sunroof - audiophile

2005 XLT scab -

1995 xlt scab - 13 inches of lift - SAS
Reply With Quote
  #125 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 07:17 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 566
mnmwhit is starting off with a positive reputation.
BLASPHAMY!!! 1500, 2500, 3500 Cummins on a Ford lovers web site SHAME
Quote:
Originally Posted by heathk2003
If i was to pull a real heavy trailer then i wouldn't have bought a 1500. If i wanted a work truck then i would have got a 2500 or 3500 with a cummins. Fact of the matter is i didn't want an industrial type truck and i like my chrome wheels clean. Is it so hard for people to understand that not everyone with a truck is on a construction crew?
__________________
Max W

06 F-350 4X4 6.0 PSD NORTH POLE, ALASKA
Mobil-1 5-40 turbo diesel truck oil from day #1
98 gallon transfer flow tank
Leer topper insulated
MBRP SS409 turbo back Off-Road duel exhaust-CAT IS GONE
AstroStart 2-way Auto start
Go Rhino pushbar/brushguard,4-9" Lite-Force moose lites
Reply With Quote
  #126 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2008, 07:19 PM
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,314
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by heathk2003
If i was to pull a real heavy trailer then i wouldn't have bought a 1500. If i wanted a work truck then i would have got a 2500 or 3500 with a cummins. Fact of the matter is i didn't want an industrial type truck and i like my chrome wheels clean. Is it so hard for people to understand that not everyone with a truck is on a construction crew?
Im with you there. That falls under the same catagory as "Its a truck its not supposed to get good gas mileage". I disagree with those people. Yea everyone knows that trucks arent going to get hybrid gas mileage but it shouldnt be getting 11mpg like the new superdutys, cummins and duramax's are. My dad is even considering selling his 08 superduty because the mileage is so bad and getting a v10. I think that if any company would make a good half ton that could average 22-25mpg would sell like crazy. Ford should rework the 5.4 and 4.6 to get better gas mileage, and leave he 6.2l to the horse power jukies. who cares if you cant beat a yota to the top of the hill. You will make up for it when he has to stop for gas.
__________________
-Josh
04 F150 4.6l 2wd reg cab XL 3:55 LS SISO Flowmaster S40 NCD Customs 2.5" Leveling Kit Burner High Power Fog Lights

85 Bronco 5.8l 351w 4wd Gas Guzzler
Reply With Quote
  #127 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 03:54 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 93
slowr w/o blowr is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERDUTY_untouchabl
Im with you there. That falls under the same catagory as "Its a truck its not supposed to get good gas mileage". I disagree with those people. Yea everyone knows that trucks arent going to get hybrid gas mileage but it shouldnt be getting 11mpg like the new superdutys, cummins and duramax's are. My dad is even considering selling his 08 superduty because the mileage is so bad and getting a v10. I think that if any company would make a good half ton that could average 22-25mpg would sell like crazy. Ford should rework the 5.4 and 4.6 to get better gas mileage, and leave he 6.2l to the horse power jukies. who cares if you cant beat a yota to the top of the hill. You will make up for it when he has to stop for gas.


This may be the best comment on the entire thread!
My thoughts exactly!
Reply With Quote
  #128 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 11:27 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: E Washington
Posts: 172
bookem15 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERDUTY_untouchabl
Im with you there. That falls under the same catagory as "Its a truck its not supposed to get good gas mileage". I disagree with those people. Yea everyone knows that trucks arent going to get hybrid gas mileage but it shouldnt be getting 11mpg like the new superdutys, cummins and duramax's are. My dad is even considering selling his 08 superduty because the mileage is so bad and getting a v10. I think that if any company would make a good half ton that could average 22-25mpg would sell like crazy. Ford should rework the 5.4 and 4.6 to get better gas mileage, and leave he 6.2l to the horse power jukies. who cares if you cant beat a yota to the top of the hill. You will make up for it when he has to stop for gas.
The only problem is that the V10 is not getting any better mileage. If it were not for a little cheaper on the price of fuel it would not be any different. But I must say you are 110% right we do not need to settle for the crappy mileage in the 150 because we all know that they can do better.
__________________
Drive it like ya stole it !!!
1997 F150 xtra cab 3 door 4X4 104,000

next truck
really really WANT F350 Harley edition
6.4 psd CC LB w/all the goodies

but

F150 with the diesel and the goodies
is all I really NEED!!
Reply With Quote
  #129 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 01:43 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mi
Posts: 213
B's FX4 is starting off with a positive reputation.
yeah i read in truck trend, not like its a realiable source though said 310 and 365...so 10 extra hp without tq? 2010 cant get here fast enough for F-150
__________________
Big B's Fleet......

2002 F-150 5.4L with K&N intake Magnaflow Exhaust, programmed, 33" BFG A/T KO Rhino Lined and a drinking problem!

2000 Mazda protege es 1.8l
2003 Honda civic ex 1.7l
1997 ski-doo 583
2000 ski-doo 700
Reply With Quote
  #130 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 01:27 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 93
slowr w/o blowr is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowr w/o blowr View Post
Ok, i am not trying to fan the horsepower flames. A respected member at the mach1 registry made a comment about the new numbers on the f150. he is saying that he made some great numbers during the testing of this truck. He also came back on later saying that the new truck was making better numbers than a lightning and that it was doing it without f.i. 2009 F150 - 2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4x4boss View Post
The guy on mach1 said it made more HP than a lightning....Well the last lightning made 380HP so I think they were testing the 6.2 because I dont think ford could get 380HP out of the 5.4 we have now. And it sure is funny that all the magazines are saying 310HP..........
A couple months later and now this same member on Mach1 registry is letting out the rear wheel h.p. Check out this link, its post #13 2010 Mustang - 2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club
Reply With Quote
  #131 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 11:06 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 386
Big Bad is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Big Bad is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I have a hard time believing that Ford Motor Company uses a Dynojet dynamometer in some hole in the wall performance shop to test unreleased products.
Reply With Quote
  #132 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 02:57 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ypsilanti, Michigan
Posts: 114
bowser is starting off with a positive reputation.
Wouldn't make much sense, seeing as how they have a big building with big letters on the front that spells out Dynamometer Lab right across from PDC.
__________________
2006 F250 CC 4X4 SB Amarillo
2001 Police Interceptor
1979 Bronco XLT Ranger
Reply With Quote
  #133 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 08:17 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Monroe Michigan
Posts: 53
BadFord93 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Just wanted to say i seen 3 versions of the truck today in Monroe on 75 one was a crew cab FX4 the other was a reg cab donno what version i know 4x4 though and the last was a cab and 1/2 donno the version eaither but it had crome horz. lines on the tailgate. all 3 trucks looked cool as hell the fx4 looked awesome
Reply With Quote
  #134 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 12:53 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 772
Fosters is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERDUTY_untouchabl View Post
Im with you there. That falls under the same catagory as "Its a truck its not supposed to get good gas mileage". I disagree with those people. Yea everyone knows that trucks arent going to get hybrid gas mileage but it shouldnt be getting 11mpg like the new superdutys, cummins and duramax's are. My dad is even considering selling his 08 superduty because the mileage is so bad and getting a v10. I think that if any company would make a good half ton that could average 22-25mpg would sell like crazy. Ford should rework the 5.4 and 4.6 to get better gas mileage, and leave he 6.2l to the horse power jukies. who cares if you cant beat a yota to the top of the hill. You will make up for it when he has to stop for gas.
The 4cyl rangers get that kinda mpg. Why don't they sell if you're so convinced a truck with that MPG would sell like crazy?

and i'll answer:

it's not possible to move a 6000lb brick through the air at 60mph and sip a teaspoon of gas every 22 miles. Gasoline doesn't have that kind of energy in it.

So then you'll answer:

"So these trucks are too heavy, and they shouldn't be so heavy and they're too big for a half ton and they make too much power that nobody needs waah, waaah"

So then I'll answer:

Go back to the Ranger comment. Explain to me why a lighter truck that gets the MPG you all whine about, that doesn't weigh as much as a yacht and doesn't win any drag races doesn't sell. You had the option of buying just what you want, but you didn't. Why?

This topic has seriously been beaten to death... let it go. your 3 ton truck isn't gonna get good mpg. you want good mpg, get another vehicle, plain and simple.
__________________
2004 F150 XLT screw 4x4 5.4 - 2.5 leveling kit, 34.5" BFGs
2004 mach1 mustang, every bolt on in the world...
Reply With Quote
  #135 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 06:23 AM
db_tanker's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Willis, Texas
Posts: 265
db_tanker is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fosters View Post
The 4cyl rangers get that kinda mpg. Why don't they sell if you're so convinced a truck with that MPG would sell like crazy?

and i'll answer:

it's not possible to move a 6000lb brick through the air at 60mph and sip a teaspoon of gas every 22 miles. Gasoline doesn't have that kind of energy in it.

So then you'll answer:

"So these trucks are too heavy, and they shouldn't be so heavy and they're too big for a half ton and they make too much power that nobody needs waah, waaah"

So then I'll answer:

Go back to the Ranger comment. Explain to me why a lighter truck that gets the MPG you all whine about, that doesn't weigh as much as a yacht and doesn't win any drag races doesn't sell. You had the option of buying just what you want, but you didn't. Why?

This topic has seriously been beaten to death... let it go. your 3 ton truck isn't gonna get good mpg. you want good mpg, get another vehicle, plain and simple.

You see...you are bringing logic to this internet argument and logic isn't a viable weapon.

as has been stated before I am sure, these vehicles are being made by the evil bassids who kept the 60-70 mpg carburetor away from the American people back in the 70's. Information provided by those who wear tin-foil or armadillo hats...

Now back down to reality...my piddly old, weak-dog 4.6l getting a meager 17 mpg puttin' down the road is just fine for me. My fiancee has an Escape that we take on trips and it gets more reasonable mileage for that purpose.

America simply lost sight of one simple yet GLARING fact. A truck is a tool, much like any vehicle...and as such it is good for certain things...but acting as a commuter vehicle isn't one of them. When they realize this finally, it will hurt Ford and the other manufacturers...but they are going to survive, I am sure.

Will I still buy a truck? yep. I am a Texan...I am somewhat hard-headed.
__________________
Darrell

2005 F-150 SCAB XLT 4.6
Flowmaster and an Edge Evo
2" lvl kit and 285/75-17 TA-KO's
"an underpowered pig that can't get out of it's own way"

Vitesse Et Puissance

NRA
TSRA
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy