Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
 
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > General Diesel Discussion
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

General Diesel Discussion





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 07:53 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 164
jonbass40 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ford and John Deere

Me and some friends were sitting around and talking about ford and there diesels when we came up with what i think is a great idea. When there contract with navistar runs out, why dont the talk to john deere about building diesels for there trucks. John Deere builds great motors and every farmer in the country would buy a ford because of the diesel. That would probably be one of the greatest partnerships in the country if u ask me. What do you guys think?
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 08:04 PM
tex25025's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,629
tex25025 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.tex25025 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I don't know about the bigger ones but their utility tractors and compact utility tractors diesel engines are made by yanmar. Maybe there could be a John Deere special edition truck too.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
SCT w/Spartan tunes(including FICM tuning)
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges

Last edited by tex25025 : 01-25-2008 at 08:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 08:08 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 164
jonbass40 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The bigger ones are all built in house as far as i know. they have an inline six engine that would be pretty much perfect for it, they have been used on irrigation pumps forever, some with over 20000hrs on them. all they would need to do is update them for road use.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 08:13 PM
tex25025's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,629
tex25025 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.tex25025 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I love all three of my john deeres but they are the smaller ones with the yanmar engine(one that's almost 20 yrs old and still running and no engine overhaul). That could be a good partnership, I just don't know if John Deere wants the headaches of light truck emissions with how they are coming down now.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
SCT w/Spartan tunes(including FICM tuning)
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 08:48 PM
FARM69's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grinnell, Iowa
Posts: 1,975
FARM69 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I think the real success for Deere is with the older larger 7.6L. The 466 was pretty much the streamline model for dozens of years.

The 8.1L had some problems in its history but overall is an excellent engine along with the 13.5L.

We don't own any of the smaller yanmar engines. Always heard good thing about them though. I know a lot of people were worried when half of the small row crop unites contained the 4.5L. I think it was because they were putting out nearly the same output as the older inline 6's.

My opinion would be to drop the 7.6L or the newer 6.8L. The 6.8 might actually fit into the engine compartment. Its only 44 inches long and 24" wide, 41" tall, weighing in at 1200 lbs.
__________________
97' F250HD 4x4 Intercooled Powerstroke 5 Speed LB / Stage II (180cc) Injectors / 10 K / 5er
A-Pillar AutoMeter Cobalts [Boost, Pyro, Water Temp]
4" Straight / EBPV Exhaust Brake / 6637 / CCV / 203 Stat / HX50 (19cm) is being mounted!!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 08:55 PM
tex25025's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,629
tex25025 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.tex25025 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FARM69
We don't own any of the smaller yanmar engines. Always heard good thing about them though.
I would equate the ones that are were in the 650 and that are currently in the 790 as dependable as the 7.3 powerstrokes. Never had a lick of problems out of either one of those and that 650 is the oldest one that I have(JD no longer makes that exact model anymore).
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
SCT w/Spartan tunes(including FICM tuning)
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 09:36 PM
ford1183's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: frostburg md
Posts: 144
ford1183 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I think that would be a great idea also i like the idea of a JD special edition.
__________________
clif

2001 FORD F-350 MODS... RAM AIR INTAKE,U.S.GEAR FAN,D.B.ENGIEN BREAK,LIFT WITH 36IN TIRES,PILLER GAUGES,BULLY DOG CHIP,CCV MOD,FOIL DELATE






Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 10:05 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Eastern MN
Posts: 510
sneak is starting off with a positive reputation.
I've been kicking around the idea of grafting a 76 F-250 CamperSpecial around a 6.8L 24 valve JD engine. But I think it would be cheaper, and more realistic to try for the mustang I want to build. Plus, I don't really care how the mustang looks, but I want my truck to look PERFECT, and like the engine BELONGS there.
__________________
1976 F-250 Camper Special - does not run
1977 F-150 Northland Edition - does not run
2002 F-350 Powerstroke
1996 Ranger 2wd 4cyl manual - daily driver
Diamond-T 5-ton truck - does not run (May recieve a DT466 in the future)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 10:09 PM
tex25025's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,629
tex25025 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.tex25025 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ford1183
I think that would be a great idea of a JD special edition.
Isn't it though. Of course, I'm sure my girlfriend and my mom would both have my head on a platter if I got something that had that much green and yellow on it.
__________________
'06 6.0L Turbo Diesel King Ranch DRW 4.30 Gears
Spartan Stage 1 Towing Injectors
Spartan 64mm Non-VGT Turbo
Fluidampner
Headstuds
SCT w/Spartan tunes(including FICM tuning)
Fuel Regulated Return
FASS 150/180
5" Straight-Piped MBRP Exhaust
Tranny, EGT, Boost, and Fuel PSI C2 Gauges
Water Temp, Oil PSI, Volts Antique Beige Gauges
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 10:26 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Eastern MN
Posts: 510
sneak is starting off with a positive reputation.
Haha, I know I'd have to have one, and probably my brother and dad.
__________________
1976 F-250 Camper Special - does not run
1977 F-150 Northland Edition - does not run
2002 F-350 Powerstroke
1996 Ranger 2wd 4cyl manual - daily driver
Diamond-T 5-ton truck - does not run (May recieve a DT466 in the future)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008, 12:31 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 319
Louisville Joe is starting off with a positive reputation.
Tell you guys a story: About 25 years ago, when GM owned Detroit Diesel, Detroit had John Deere help with the design of the Detroit 60 Series semi truck engine. And, the plan was not going to stop there. Detroit was going to merge with JD's engine division, and JD was going to be the primary diesel supplier to GM. A few Deere 5.9L's were installed in Chevy medium duty trucks for testing, and some of them were given to dealers. The floor of the Topkick and Kodiak was made to clear the Deere's valve cover. It was all set to go, and something happened. Detroit ended up sold to Penske, and the Topkick and Kodiak went with Caterpillar power. Later on, GM considered a Deere diesel to replace the 6.5L, but it lost out to the Isuzu designed Duramax. The Deere was too heavy and didn't make the kind of power GM was looking for.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008, 01:27 AM
bf250's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,107
bf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to behold
so, any links to r&d articles concerning the deere light truck diesel?

who in the heck cares who makes the diesel anyway. i seriously doubt too many people would base their truck buying decision on who makes the engine. how many of you would buy a chevy or dodge if deere made the engine for them? how many of you are rushing out to buy a dodge just for the cummins?

of course no one would go rushing out to buy a chevy/dodge with a deere engine. heck, many of you all would just be trying to debate how much better your ford engine is than the deere.
__________________
current ride - 2003 explorer, 4x4, v8

ford trucks i have previously owned
1972 f250 1989 f250
1995 f350 2004 f250
2006 f250

will get a truck again!

Last edited by bf250 : 01-26-2008 at 01:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008, 02:12 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 164
jonbass40 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well coming from a farming background, im sure you would see a lot of farmers switch over to ford if they had a john deere powerplant, and i know of plenty of people who bought dodges just because they had the cummins. Your everyday soccer mom isnt going to care who makes the motor, your right. but how many people are buying diesels because they need a reliable work vehical, the vast majority. john deere builds good equipment and it would be a win win situation for both companies.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008, 02:16 AM
bf250's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,107
bf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to beholdbf250 is a splendid one to behold
only diesels are reliable????????
__________________
current ride - 2003 explorer, 4x4, v8

ford trucks i have previously owned
1972 f250 1989 f250
1995 f350 2004 f250
2006 f250

will get a truck again!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008, 02:37 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 164
jonbass40 is starting off with a positive reputation.
No I didnt mean that only diesels are reliable, gas engines are plenty reliable. I ment the people nuying them need a reliable work truck, not a commuter truck.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.