Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
 
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Diesel > General Diesel Discussion
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

General Diesel Discussion





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2008, 10:34 PM
herman391's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Leamington, Ontario
Posts: 1,215
herman391 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.herman391 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Supercharger or turbo?

So we were sitting around at work today chatting about cars like we normally do and the topic came around to diesel engines. One guy said that turbo's are the only way to go with diesels. Another guy said Superchargers were just as good if not better for diesels. I've never seen a diesel with a supercharger on it but then again I'm not big into the diesel side of things.

What do you guys have to say?
   
__________________
Steve-AKA herman391
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2008, 11:57 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eat me
Posts: 2,190
BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Turbo. Power from waste. How can you argue with that?

Mike
__________________
2000 F150 5.4 4R70W 4x4 Supercab 3.55 gears
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 01:16 AM
Pocket's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 3,881
Pocket has a great reputation on FTE.Pocket has a great reputation on FTE.Pocket has a great reputation on FTE.Pocket has a great reputation on FTE.
If supercharging a diesel were really better than turbo, we'd see it on our trucks and semi's by now.
__________________
Curtis
2002 F-250 PSD
Best time: 15.3 @ 86.8 MPH at Bandimere - 9/10/08
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 01:17 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,034
884x4broncoII is starting off with a positive reputation.
i agree with blk94 a super charger uses hp to make hp turbos use the exaust to make hp, turbo's are better, but then again superchargers have no lag so a super charger would give you better throttle responnse. but powergains/economy turbo is the only way to go
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 01:45 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 56
theblueox is starting off with a positive reputation.
alot of the older semi's used super chargers. If I remember right the early drag racers took the 6-71 super chargers off of diesels and modified them to work on the hemis.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 06:24 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,448
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theblueox
alot of the older semi's used super chargers. If I remember right the early drag racers took the 6-71 super chargers off of diesels and modified them to work on the hemis.
Those superchargers were on Detroit Diesel 2 stroke engines, they would'nt run without them as there was no intake stroke to draw in a sufficient amount of air. The 6-71 designation was actually the identifier of the engine the blower came off of, the 6 stood for six cylinder and the 71 for seventy one cubic inches per cylinder.
__________________
Powerstroking Seven T444Es, one VT365 and one 6.0. Also four DT466s, one DT360 and a Mercedes MBE906.


I'm doing my part to reduce food imports, control rising food costs and help feed the children, my trucks run on 100% petroleum diesel. What are you doing?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 06:37 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,805
Lead Head is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.Lead Head is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Yeah, them detroits didn't have super chargers, they called them "induction blowers", and they were actually considered naturally aspirated.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 09:53 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,448
origcharger is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head
Yeah, them detroits didn't have super chargers, they called them "induction blowers", and they were actually considered naturally aspirated.
Yep, and some of them had turbochargers on them also to feed the "Induction blowers".
__________________
Powerstroking Seven T444Es, one VT365 and one 6.0. Also four DT466s, one DT360 and a Mercedes MBE906.


I'm doing my part to reduce food imports, control rising food costs and help feed the children, my trucks run on 100% petroleum diesel. What are you doing?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 10:25 AM
rbaker6336's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Naples,Fl Blairsville,Ga
Posts: 4,082
rbaker6336 has a good reputation on FTE.rbaker6336 has a good reputation on FTE.rbaker6336 has a good reputation on FTE.
cummins also used superchargers years ago,they added about 100 HP
__________________
Ray
2000 F-350 2WD,DRW Auto, PSD,
DP Tuner,40 Tow 80E,Wicked Wheel 4" Exhaust ,AIS intake, Guages,6.0 Trans cooler to install
DooDad???=(dfuser ram air)
'98 Grand Cherokee
'86 F-150 SB Lariat 4x4 bought new (needs new home)
PAA #35
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 10:41 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: northern Michigan
Posts: 444
stormyrider is starting off with a positive reputation.
I have seen a detroit diesel on a generator set that had twin turbo's and a supercharger on it. superchargers supply low end power for when you first get a load but require power from the engine to drive them. Turbos don't give much boost until you have already loaded the engine and are getting some exhaust gas volume, this is the source of turbo lag. turbo's are making use of the waste heat in the exhaust and don't rob any power from the engine to operate so they are the more energy friendly way to go and are also cheaper and weigh less then the superchargers.
__________________
2000 F250 4 x 4 77,000 miles conventional cab longbed
six speed manual transmission.
AIS intake, 4" turbo back Magnaflow S/S exhaust
inlet & outlet pyrometers & boost gauge
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 02:27 PM
Joshua0606's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marco, Louisiana
Posts: 584
Joshua0606 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The saying "It takes power to make power" is not true, for example turbos and NOS.
__________________
Josh
'05 F-250, CC, King Ranch, 6.0 PSD
- 4" turbo back
- Spartan tuned SCT

JOIN THE LOUISIANA CHAPTER, CLICK HERE
LA CHAPTER PHOTO ALBUM
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 02:57 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 980
rob_nc is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua0606
The saying "It takes power to make power" is not true, for example turbos and NOS.
You are partially correct. Turbos do require power to operate, in the form of heat energy. They don't rob any power from the crankshaft is where the difference is.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 04:03 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Eastern MN
Posts: 510
sneak is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob_nc
You are partially correct. Turbos do require power to operate, in the form of heat energy. They don't rob any power from the crankshaft is where the difference is.
We could chase eachother around forever, but the way I would describe it is:

A supercharger is belt driven off of a crankshaft pully, it draws about 35-50% the extra torque or power it adds to its naturally aspirated cousin.

A turbocharger uses energy that would otherwise be wasted, using an exhaust turbine. There are no gears or lots of rotating mass to rob torque anywhere in a turbocharging system. That is why they say it gives you "free" power.
The problem with calling it free power is that in order to produce boost, you must create back pressure to drive the turbine. The loss of efficiency with a turbo is generally much smaller, generally being less than 10% loss due to the backpressure created, and less than 5% on some well engineered industrial turbocharged setups.
__________________
1976 F-250 Camper Special - does not run
1977 F-150 Northland Edition - does not run
2002 F-350 Powerstroke
1996 Ranger 2wd 4cyl manual - daily driver
Diamond-T 5-ton truck - does not run (May recieve a DT466 in the future)
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 05:57 PM
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,429
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Why not both?
__________________
-Josh
04 F150 4.6l Gryphon Powered 2wd reg cab XL 3:55 LS SISO Flowmaster S40 NCD Customs 2.5" Leveling Kit Burner High Power Fog Lights
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 06:10 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Eastern MN
Posts: 510
sneak is starting off with a positive reputation.
Because unless you have a two stroke and need it, it's more efficient to run one, or two, or three turbo's.

Now if you're going to be street racing you could use both, and it might be justafiable.
__________________
1976 F-250 Camper Special - does not run
1977 F-150 Northland Edition - does not run
2002 F-350 Powerstroke
1996 Ranger 2wd 4cyl manual - daily driver
Diamond-T 5-ton truck - does not run (May recieve a DT466 in the future)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.