Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 12:47 PM
fireman29b's Avatar
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 24
fireman29b is starting off with a positive reputation.
2010

I'll wait on the 2010 Diesel here! My '05 should get me through until then.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 01:03 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Duluth, Mn.
Posts: 1,130
fonefiddy is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sure Ford offers a lot of differnt F150 configs, but they don't offer a CC/8'box. And the fuel milage is the same as it has been for 20 years. We'll see what the Diesel and EcoBoost do for MPG.

I'll stick with what brung me , untill we see what they do.
__________________
93 F One Fiddy- 5.0/AOD/3.55 230K OEM
93 F Two Fiddy Scab- 7.3/ZF5/4.10/Sidewinder II,94 Turbo pump,G Inj's, Velvet Ride, Turbo Bumper, Alcoa's
85 F Two Fiddy-6.9/C6/3.54/ Holley Red, Racor, Soup Bowl,AutoJet 3",Ride Rite Rear

Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 01:41 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 62
jllang2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i don't buy trucks the first year in production, maybe next year.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 01:41 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 359
ford9c is starting off with a positive reputation.
After the crap ford has put me through with my 04, on principal alone I shouldn't even consider buying a ford. That being said, if they really put out something awesome, something that is just clearly the best by all standards by everyone that see's / drives it. I might consider test driving that vehicle. The 09 f150 looks like it misses that mark on several major fronts. So I will either be going back to Dodge, or maybe a Nissan will be in my future.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 01:56 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 329
hsfbfan is starting off with a positive reputation.
It won't be an '09 because of finances. Probably be in this cycle though, 2011 probably.

I will shop Ford first, this model changes nothning
__________________
1988 F-150 XLT 4x4
Manual Hubs
5.8L Automatic
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 02:28 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eat me
Posts: 1,916
BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.BLK94F150 has a very good reputation on FTE.
Are they going to be using a 5 or 6 speed auto? If not, then no way. I'm tired of 4 speeds.

I'm sure that I'll be disappointed in the power #s as Ford is always near or at the bottom of the pack so those extra gears would be nice. Whenever the diesel is available, it will probably cost close to what the SD diesel costs.

I like the looks and styling of F150s as far back as I can recall, so I'm in there.

My points are kind of moot though, as my next truck is most likely a Superduty (Hopefully 08+ PSD) or 2500 Mega Cab w/Cummins and 6 speed manual.

I'm just tired of driving under powered, under geared 1/2 ton Fords.

Mike
__________________
2000 F150 5.4 4R70W 4x4 Supercab 3.55 gears
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 02:35 PM
fireman29b's Avatar
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 24
fireman29b is starting off with a positive reputation.
2010

I would go SD but I honestly don't need the payload capacity or rougher riding chassis/suspension. I just want the longevity of the diesel motor and hopefully some decent numbers on the fuel mileage.

Please, let it be something worth killing the other mfg's.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 02:39 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Duluth, Mn.
Posts: 1,130
fonefiddy is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLK94F150
Are they going to be using a 5 or 6 speed auto? If not, then no way. I'm tired of 4 speeds.

Mike
It's a new 6 speed slushbox
__________________
93 F One Fiddy- 5.0/AOD/3.55 230K OEM
93 F Two Fiddy Scab- 7.3/ZF5/4.10/Sidewinder II,94 Turbo pump,G Inj's, Velvet Ride, Turbo Bumper, Alcoa's
85 F Two Fiddy-6.9/C6/3.54/ Holley Red, Racor, Soup Bowl,AutoJet 3",Ride Rite Rear

Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 04:26 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 522
supeRobertduty is starting off with a positive reputation.
So it looks like if you want to stay with FORD it's a 2 or 3 Year wait ahead
1 year min untill new power options
1 year to work out bugs (on new gasser)
2 Years to work out bugs (on new Diesel)
__________________
2007 F350 Lariat V-10, Auto 142" WB 4.30's, Camper pkg,FX4, Manual Hubs ,Wedgewood blue.

1979 Bronco XLT 400,auto,205,Factory C.B ,4.10 trailer special, loaded only 90K California miles.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 04:46 PM
horsepuller's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,682
horsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant futurehorsepuller has a brilliant future
I just hope the fuel economy gains on the new truck are not tied to the new 6 speed transmission. GM's new 6 speed has no direct ratio. Fourth gear is underdrive and both fifth and sixth are overdrive. Fine for a diesel engine but kind of awkward for a medium sized gasoline engine.

But no, it's not likely an '09 will be my next truck. I was really hoping for a much needed styling and design change for the new F150. Both inside and out. But I find the color combinations and design looks of the dash/console and interior very unappealing.

I do like the front on view of the cab. They should have kept going with that theme from nose to tail. Instead it looks diminished. Like a shepard's head on a terrier's body.

It's not Ford's fault that I don't like it. I must not be part of the demographic they are marketing it to. But I do find it a bit frustrating that after owning heavy duty Ford pickups for so many years, the first time I want a light duty pickup the F150 just seems so alien to me.
__________________
Scott
FTE Moderator

Last edited by horsepuller : 01-16-2008 at 04:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 04:48 PM
builtfordtough13's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 784
builtfordtough13 is starting off with a positive reputation.
If Ford doesn't put more power in there then I will go buy an 08 F-150 with all the rebates for a lot cheaper. No matter what my next truck would be a Ford, but they have to give me reasons to pay probably 5-6,000 more for that truck and a big part of that means putting more power in there.
__________________
Jake

Mine: 1994 F-150 4x4 Supercab, 351, E4OD, Light Santa Fe Clearcoat/Medium Polomino Accent 155,000 miles

Dad's: 2004 Expedition Eddie Bauer White/Gold 4x2 Every option except Nav 52,000 miles

Mom's: 2001 Focus SE Sport, 2.0L Zetec Fort Knox Gold 131,000 miles



Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 05:07 PM
fordtruckman's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lawrence, Mi
Posts: 1,188
fordtruckman is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I might buy one in like 5 years but I'm not really in the market for a new vehicle. If i had the money though I'd buy one if it had a 6.2l (Because i would have the money for the gas) But if i really had the money and the 6.2l didnt have 403hp then I'd get a new GMC Sierra Denali...
__________________
Matt / Michigan Chapter Member

2004.5 F150 STX, 4x4, 4.6l, Scab / Click Picture
2007 Ford Fusion SEL V6

Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 05:13 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 127
REDFORDFX4 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Will definatly be a Ford but probably not til 10,11 model YR!

those other so called trucks are just copy cat wannabe.

Come on ever since the 04 came out thats all the others have done is try

to beat it and I mean try.(come on can't even load a fourwheeler in bed of the tintoy without bending the tailgate).
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 05:22 PM
SMIGGS's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,054
SMIGGS has a good reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a good reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a good reputation on FTE.
For anyone interested I have set up a poll in the Ford vs the Competition section.

It's easier to have the computer tally up which truck (s) are impressing people.

http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/69...ou-choose.html
__________________
SMIGGS
2000 Eddie Bauer
1999 F-150 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 07:11 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 88
bamacommander is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sure I would buy the new F150. I'll probably wait for the diesel, but then agaian I have a 2007 with 12000 miles and a 5 year ESP. Also what difference does a few extra Horses matter, the horsepower ratings between the differnt manufacturers is so slight it makes no difference. Each manufacturer has features that some people like and others do not. For example the GM's have rear drum brakes, the Toyota's chasis has alot of flex which causes severe bed bounce and the Dodge has issues of it's own. The overall package and the technology in the new Ford beats the other guys hands down. If your so concerned about towing the brake/sway control is worth it's wieght in gold. I had an F250 with the brake control and it was great. I would not jump off the Ford bandwagon, they build a fine truck. Everybody else wants to be where Ford is. I question some of the above comments and wonder if they have another agenda. Just my thoughts and opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy