1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

GVM of F250 L/D vs H/D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:24 AM
Ken Blythen's Avatar
Ken Blythen
Ken Blythen is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,499
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
GVM of F250 L/D vs H/D

For several months I've been trying to buy a local 1982 F350, unfortunately this has fallen through.

I'm looking now at the possibility of shipping an F250 across to New Zealand.
Regulations here require any L/H drive vehicle to be converted to R/H if the manufacturer's GVM rating (vehicle weight + payload) exceeds 3500kg.

Can someone give me the GVM figures for both the Light & Heavy duty versions of the 80-86, 2WD F250's?

What were the significant differences between the two - chassis, axles, general durability etc? Were any years particularly better or worse?

Thanks very much
 
  #2  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:34 AM
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
ford390gashog is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brentwood,CA
Posts: 26,006
Received 519 Likes on 398 Posts
I think you are after the GVWR Gross Vehicle Weight Rating.Ford did make a F-250 light duty with a 6900lb GVWR but it was weak. Most F-250 trucks had a 8100lb GVWR and the F-350 trucks had 10,000LB GVWR.
 
  #3  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:42 AM
Ken Blythen's Avatar
Ken Blythen
Ken Blythen is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,499
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Thanks for the fast reply.
What were the weaknesses in the L/D version?
 
  #4  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:44 AM
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
ford390gashog is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brentwood,CA
Posts: 26,006
Received 519 Likes on 398 Posts
The frame, brakes and axles. They were almost the same as a F-150.
 
  #5  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:51 AM
Ken Blythen's Avatar
Ken Blythen
Ken Blythen is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,499
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
The HD version would suit me perfectly, but it's just over the weight limit. A R/H conversion would cost around $10,000 - out of the question

Thanks again - back to the drawing board!
 
  #6  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:03 AM
Piffery1's Avatar
Piffery1
Piffery1 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Niceville, FL.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to my '83 Ford Light Truck Specifications Book the Non-Heavy Duty (4X2) F250's came in GVWR's of 6,500, 6,900, 7,300 and 7,900 lbs. The F350's were all 8,700 or above. The GVWR should be printed on a sticker attached to the driver's side door frame.
 
  #7  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:12 AM
Ken Blythen's Avatar
Ken Blythen
Ken Blythen is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,499
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
The 7300lb version would meet the criteria & not need a conversion, but how light are the construction & mechanicals on these?
 
  #8  
Old 01-15-2008, 01:12 PM
Piffery1's Avatar
Piffery1
Piffery1 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Niceville, FL.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really don't know but I'd guess that if it has 8-lug wheels/axles it would be fine. Depends on what you want to do and how much you want to haul
 
  #9  
Old 01-15-2008, 01:31 PM
Skoiv's Avatar
Skoiv
Skoiv is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tualatin, OR
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My 80 F250 2wd camper special had a GVWR of 7650 with a Dana 60 semi-floating axle. It looks like lots of variables.
 
  #10  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:59 PM
boss429kiwi's Avatar
boss429kiwi
boss429kiwi is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Ken Blythen
For several months I've been trying to buy a local 1982 F350, unfortunately this has fallen through.

I'm looking now at the possibility of shipping an F250 across to New Zealand.
Regulations here require any L/H drive vehicle to be converted to R/H if the manufacturer's GVM rating (vehicle weight + payload) exceeds 3500kg.

Can someone give me the GVM figures for both the Light & Heavy duty versions of the 80-86, 2WD F250's?

What were the significant differences between the two - chassis, axles, general durability etc? Were any years particularly better or worse?

Thanks very much
Hi Ken
If you want to purchase locale (Dunedin), I have a 1984 F250 4x4, cab & 1/2, 6.9L Diesel that I would consider selling. Very good condition! Mint deck, only 100K miles etc.
gary.mcneill@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
 

Last edited by boss429kiwi; 01-15-2008 at 03:02 PM.
  #11  
Old 01-15-2008, 04:36 PM
kermmydog's Avatar
kermmydog
kermmydog is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western Central NV
Posts: 9,177
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
In the 80-86 Ford F series the only difference in GVW was the rear ends & springs. The Frames are the same. Ford Made a what was called a light F250. It had 8 lugs but wasn't a full floater rear end. The rest used Full floater rear ends. Then they built an F250 with the basic 1 ton suspensions, these came with the diesel option.
 
  #12  
Old 02-12-2008, 03:22 AM
Ken Blythen's Avatar
Ken Blythen
Ken Blythen is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,499
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
How common are the lighter duty versions?

I've been watching Craigslist (on the west coast, because of shipping out of LA), but so far all have had the high GVWR.

An extended cab, 2WD, 4-sp manual, 351W under 7700lb GVWR, would be ideal - but they don't seem common
 
  #13  
Old 02-12-2008, 09:10 AM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Franklin2 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53,622
Likes: 0
Received 1,678 Likes on 1,356 Posts
The extended cab is going to aggravate the GVW rating, since that's going to make the truck heavier.
 
  #14  
Old 02-12-2008, 11:30 AM
Ken Blythen's Avatar
Ken Blythen
Ken Blythen is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,499
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
What about in the L/D with those options but single cab?

How common were the L/D generally?
 

Last edited by Ken Blythen; 02-12-2008 at 11:39 AM.
  #15  
Old 02-21-2008, 12:09 PM
Ken Blythen's Avatar
Ken Blythen
Ken Blythen is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,499
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Kermmydog

I've found a 7300lb GVWR F250 for sale. Are the mechanicals (other than rear axle) also the same as the heavy GVWR trucks.

Thanks
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tassiedude
Australia Chapter
99
10-12-2021 03:15 PM
C-Jones Lawn & Tree
Large Truck
12
01-28-2016 11:26 PM
Diesel Submariner
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
6
05-29-2012 06:29 PM
Barthog34
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
09-04-2011 05:27 PM
jaydgraff
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
02-28-2006 09:36 PM



Quick Reply: GVM of F250 L/D vs H/D



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM.