Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 05:46 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hewitt, Minnesota
Posts: 800
Old Rust Bucket is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I actualy like the front end of the '09, too bad they can't put a decent drive train under it. Ford has been slidding down hill since they killed the 300/302/351 motors.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 05:52 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 133
pugster is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question Where's The Diesel??

I don't know about the 302, I didn't think much of my 87 5.0L F150 engine. But I was expecting a diesel in the 2009, did I get bad info somehow??
__________________
Fords:
2008 F250SD, 4x4, 6.4L 15,900 mi.
1995 Explorer XLT, 200k/10 years Sold
1987 F150 XLT Lariat, 5.0L 208k, 8 years Sold
All bought new.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:05 PM
Layed Out 100's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hernando Ms.
Posts: 617
Layed Out 100 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
think I will keep my 04 until it grows on me,or until there is some real horse power under the hood,when ever that may be?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:11 PM
David85's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 3,369
David85 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The 302 is OK, but the 351w and 300 l6 were better. The 302 has too short a stroke and too restrictive ports to have a good powerband for a truck.
__________________
1986 F250HD Ex cab Fresh built up 6.9L diesel Lariat AC leather seats power everything w/full cluster, sterling rear 3.08LS gears, E4OD trans, ram intake ATS 088 turbo


1986 F150 Ex cab Lariat rollercam 5.0L on LPG AOD trans 3.55 gears 390 000Ks
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:15 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 101
Aberdale Farm is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Well, I've looked at the pics on and off all day to see if the styling would grow on me. So far, here's what I've decided:

If Ford was looking to make the F150 look more like the superduty, then the styling is a success.

If Ford was trying to make the F150 look bigger than it already is, then the styling is a success.

If Ford was just trying to make it look different and fresh, then the styling is a success.

If Ford wanted me to trade my '06 F150 for a '09 F150 because I am so excited about the styling then it was not a success.

Bottom line for me, it's just okay. Other than the styling and the 6 spd auto tranny, it's not much different than my current truck. So far, I still like the '04-'08 styling better.

Dale
__________________
Prior trucks:
1969 Chevrolet C10 350
1976 Ford F250 360
1982 Nissan 2.2 Diesel
1986 Ford Ranger 4x4 2.3
1992 Ford F150 4x4 5.8
1997 Dodge 3500 4x4 5.9 Diesel

Current trucks:
1950 Chevolet 3800 235
1991 Ford Aeromax L-8000 7.8 Diesel
1992 Ford F150 4.9
2006 Ford F150 Lariat 4x4 5.4

Ex-Ford Truck Body Engineer
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:21 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 96
bamacommander is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am glad to see the side airbags, traction control, towing brake/sway control, blue tooth and other goodies. My wife really liked the interior. I think it's a winner. Good job! Looking forward to the diesel, just do not make another 6.0 PSD mistake and hurry it to market.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:30 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 158
SuperCrewDude is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by excaliber551
I really like the looks of the new truck What I can't understand is why reveal a whole new truck with the same old tired engine. That makes no sense.

I like the added room in the back of the Supercrew but why would I buy this truck when I know a bigger 6.2 and a Diesel is in the works?
I agree. They should've rolled out a new motor to go along with the re-design, or get the 5.4 bumped up to the range of the others. While I'm perfectly happy with my 04 and it's power, they really do need something to rebuke the Toyota's 381 HP.

All in all though I think it's a beautiful rig and if I were in the market for a new truck I would have no problem owning one.

The new Dodge looks very good to me too. I personally see big sales gains for them with this model.
__________________
2004 F150 SuperCrew XLT 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:48 PM
David85's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 3,369
David85 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The delay in the release of a new diesel is nothing new. The first diesel trucks ford offered were in 1983, 3 years after the redesigned body of 1980, the later 7.3 was a year after the 1987 body, and the first powerstroke diesel was 1.5 years after the 1992 model year.

The original 6.9L diesel was under development for as long as it was in service, no doubt there were many delays, but the result was a good diesel, if ford has to delay the release of a new diesel in their F150s for quality assurance, than so be it. Don't forget that it was chevy that was the first to offer a V8 diesel in the early 80s for light trucks, that advantage meant nothing when ford came out with their bigger better diesel. To this day chevy is still trying to live that reputation down, being the first is not always best.
__________________
1986 F250HD Ex cab Fresh built up 6.9L diesel Lariat AC leather seats power everything w/full cluster, sterling rear 3.08LS gears, E4OD trans, ram intake ATS 088 turbo


1986 F150 Ex cab Lariat rollercam 5.0L on LPG AOD trans 3.55 gears 390 000Ks
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 08:14 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 22,463
FTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Rust Bucket
I actualy like the front end of the '09, too bad they can't put a decent drive train under it. Ford has been slidding down hill since they killed the 300/302/351 motors.
I'll put a 5.4 up against a 351 or 302 any day. No factory 351w ever came close to the current 5.4L in power output.
__________________
-Ken
Look, I'm gonna have to ask you to go ahead, just come back another time. I got a meeting with the Bob's in a couple minutes.

See "IB Tim" for support.

2006 Roush F150 Project: Roushcharger, Troyer Tuning, 9lb pulley, E-Fans, Headers, Brandmotion GPS, BlueConnect Hands-Free Phone & iPod Direct Connect, Black Head/Tail Lights, Retrax Tonneau, more...
04 F250 King Ranch Crewcab 6L PSD project: DP-Tuner Tuning, MBRP Stainless Dual Exhaust.
00 Ranger Supercab XLT 3.0 V6: Bright Box, Mac Intake, Borla exhaust, my tuning.
RIP: 67 & 75 F100

Last edited by FTE Ken : 01-14-2008 at 08:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:45 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 19,042
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by David85
The 302 is OK, but the 351w and 300 l6 were better. The 302 has too short a stroke and too restrictive ports to have a good powerband for a truck.
HEE HEE, the 302 and 351W used the same heads especially 87-96. E7TE heads. The only difference was the 351 uses larger diameter head bolts. All else is the same
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:50 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 335
hsfbfan is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTE Ken
I'll put a 5.4 up against a 351 or 302 any day. No factory 351w ever came close to the current 5.4L in power output.
I own an '88 with at 5.8, an '89 with a 5.0, and an '06 with a 4.6.

The 4.6 is the better motor hands down.
__________________
1988 F-150 XLT 4x4
Manual Hubs
5.8L Automatic
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:52 PM
thorseshoeing's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,662
thorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant futurethorseshoeing has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by FTE Ken
I'll put a 5.4 up against a 351 or 302 any day. No factory 351w ever came close to the current 5.4L in power output.
Yeah, but it's no match for the mighty 300...

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 10:03 PM
David85's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Campbell River, B.C.
Posts: 3,369
David85 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LxMan1
HEE HEE, the 302 and 351W used the same heads especially 87-96. E7TE heads. The only difference was the 351 uses larger diameter head bolts. All else is the same
I am aware of that. The 351 does gain somewhat from the small ports because of the longer stroke. Meaning a good midrange powerband with good low end torque and acceptable MPG. The 300 inline 6 also has a restrictive head that plays a role in the low range torque. The 302 does have some low end torque, but the short stroke means that it would shine better if it were allowed to breath a little easier.

If you were to open up a 302 or 351, you could be on par with the modular V8s. Ford was notorious for putting restrictive exhaust systems in their trucks, gas or diesel, more recently they started opening things up, and that contributes to many of the higher performance of newer engines. Why did it take so long for ford to factory equip their trucks with headers? Headers are not exactly new.
__________________
1986 F250HD Ex cab Fresh built up 6.9L diesel Lariat AC leather seats power everything w/full cluster, sterling rear 3.08LS gears, E4OD trans, ram intake ATS 088 turbo


1986 F150 Ex cab Lariat rollercam 5.0L on LPG AOD trans 3.55 gears 390 000Ks
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 10:03 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stahlstown, Pa.
Posts: 58
110Dave is starting off with a positive reputation.
No 6 speed manual option? Maybe if they would have offered a manual with a V-8 in the previous models they would have sold more than 1%. When the wifey's 2002 F-150 needs replacing it will be with a superduty and if they drop the manual option for those also we will both be driving Dodges. They maybe the only ones left to offer a manual. I really find it hard to believe that only 1% of F-150 buyers wanted a manual. I don't care how well the new automatics shift, the wife and I prefer to shift our own gears and will give our buisness to whoever gives us this option.
__________________
2008 F-350 6.4l Crew Cab Lariet 4x4, 6 speed manual, 35" Super Swamper Vortracs.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 10:07 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 531
Twinsdad98 is starting off with a positive reputation.
If I wanted an truck to look like a super duty, I'd buy one (SD). I like the fact the today's 150 looks different from the SDs. But typical Ford, copy what everyone else is doing. Let's make all our trucks look the same.. I'm in no hurry to buy one, although I would love to have the 6 speed in my 04....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.