Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #166 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008, 06:01 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Duluth, Mn.
Posts: 1,164
fonefiddy is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishammer
When GM has to pay it's workers (I believe I read 90-95%) of their pay while layed off...that is gonna kill the company.

There's no way in He!! thats true
__________________
93 F One Fiddy- 5.0/AOD/3.55 230K OEM
93 F Two Fiddy Scab- 7.3/ZF5/3.55/Sidewinder II,94 Turbo pump,G Inj's, Velvet Ride, Ride Rite Rear, Turbo Bumper, Alcoa's
85 F Two Fiddy-6.9/C6/3.54/ Holley Red, Racor, Soup Bowl,AutoJet 3",Ride Rite Rear

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #167 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008, 07:45 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,078
MobeyDick is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Power Kid
So now Dodge, Toyota and GM all @ 380 hp mark.... And Ford has? I've just read every possible posting/article I can read on the new F150 and not one possible word uttered about the 6.2L. I won't beleive it exsists until I drive it myself....
How can Ford do so much homework on everything else on thet truck and overlook the ENGINE.
Yep, I want to throw away reliability for piston slap.
__________________
01 Lariat 7.3, CC, LB, 4X4, K&N, DP Tuner 4" Magnaflow Exhaust, BTS Tranny, 3 gauge A piller pod, 315s on 10s, Warn 16.5ti Winch Bumper, 290,523 miles! -07 Shelby GT500-
Reply With Quote
  #168 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008, 07:49 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,078
MobeyDick is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterCMK
A blower on a quad-cam 5.4 would be siiiiick
They are Siiiiick!

__________________
01 Lariat 7.3, CC, LB, 4X4, K&N, DP Tuner 4" Magnaflow Exhaust, BTS Tranny, 3 gauge A piller pod, 315s on 10s, Warn 16.5ti Winch Bumper, 290,523 miles! -07 Shelby GT500-
Reply With Quote
  #169 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008, 09:12 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 2,340
osbornk is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishammer
Most people hate to admit it but the UAW is hugely responsible for killing the domestic automakers. When GM has to pay it's workers (I believe I read 90-95%) of their pay while layed off...that is gonna kill the company. I am sure Ford and Chrysler are near the same numbers.... The unions were very important back years ago but have grown too powerful and have led to the predicament the Big 3 are in today.
It's not just GM, it's all 3 of the domestics. I don't blame the unions, I blame the manufacturers for agreeing to many of the expensive benefits the union members have. They didn't stand their ground when things were rosy and they thought the gravy train would last forever.

The union leadership's job is to get the most they can for their members. If they ask and the manufacturers give under threat of a strike, the manufacturers apparently felt giving in was the cheapest route to take. They didn't think long range.
__________________
2004 XLT Regular Cab, Short Bed, 4X4 with 5.4 and 3.73.
Reply With Quote
  #170 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008, 11:12 AM
sglaine's Avatar
New England Chapter LDR
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Where Critters Roam NH
Posts: 15,925
sglaine has much to be proud ofsglaine has much to be proud ofsglaine has much to be proud ofsglaine has much to be proud ofsglaine has much to be proud ofsglaine has much to be proud ofsglaine has much to be proud ofsglaine has much to be proud ofsglaine has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishammer
Most people hate to admit it but the UAW is hugely responsible for killing the domestic automakers. When GM has to pay it's workers (I believe I read 90-95%) of their pay while layed off...that is gonna kill the company. I am sure Ford and Chrysler are near the same numbers.... The unions were very important back years ago but have grown too powerful and have led to the predicament the Big 3 are in today.


I agree with you there...Nice post..
__________________
00 F350 4x4 Power Stroke 6spd drw rack body 4.10
02 Explorer XLT 4X4 Red
03 Explorer XLT 4X4 Aspen Green
04 F250 4x4 5.4 6 spd pickup 3.73

Leader of the New England Chapter.. Come And Join - CLICK HERE
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveBricks
She looks like the south end of a northbound mule
Reply With Quote
  #171 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008, 10:50 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 387
irishammer is starting off with a positive reputation.
95% IS true... read about it here... http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/26/business/26auto.htmlTotal BS in my opinion!!
Reply With Quote
  #172 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2008, 11:00 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11
rick265 is starting off with a positive reputation.
im hoping ford will come thru with 5.4 with 350+ hp or mayber 6.2l but ford hasn't said or mentioned anthing on 6.2l we'll just have to wait and see
Reply With Quote
  #173 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2008, 12:59 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 19,040
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
6.2L is still in development/testing stage. It is real. A 7L version is running 800hp right now without a power adder on E85.
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/63...g-boss-v8.html
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #174 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2008, 01:26 AM
aldridgec's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Baltimore USA
Posts: 2,225
aldridgec is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Since I am not going to read all 10+ pages of this post....

Here is my $.02. There is always something better, stronger, faster, more powerful. It's time we stopped letting numbers sell a truck. My truck has more __________ than yours. My _________ is better than your __________ . Hey I know it's the manly way to be, but it has to end somewhere? Soon an f-150 will have a GVWR of 10k? Then what? We can stick a bed on a 650, sell it as a 250 and say it has the most towing capacity in its class. So what???? What does it really mean? Lets just put a dana 80 in all the 250/350 and 19.5 inch wheels. It's a $50k truck, it should have it right????

I agree that you can't govern fuel economy or safety right??? If we raise gas prices to $4.50 or $5.00 gal will everyone then want a truck that gets 25mpg or better? The technology is there folks to do it, but right now it just doesn't sell. So it's up to the governt to make it look like they are doing something about it I suppose.

How bout a HP tax, or displacment tax like some of Europe has? Some states have weight based registration/taxes. Less may be and should be worth more in some instances. Yes, I have a diesel F250, but I don't drive it all the time. I have a smaller more efficient car I drive regularly. When I use my truck, I use it and expect it to do what I need. I just worry that these GVW, TQ, HP superiority races are going to hurt us all soon.
__________________
Chris

ASE Certified Master Automotive Technician

Current Vehicles:
2002 F-250 7.3L PSD 4x4 XLT
2002 Sunset Orange Mettalic WS6 Trans Am Convertible

"Maybe is for those who lack skill"
Reply With Quote
  #175 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2008, 01:30 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 19,040
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
Personally, If I was towing much over 8000lbs, I'd wan't dual rear wheels anyway. Had a friend blow a tire in a curve with single rear wheel, it wasn't pretty. He has a F350 Dually 7.3L now for towing his enclosed trailer.
I tow about 7500lbs with my 01 F150. I wouldn't haul much more with any single wheel 1/2 ton truck.
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #176 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:34 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 400
dascro is starting off with a positive reputation.
I think these horsepower, size ,weight etc. wars have already begun to hurt us. Although I think 25mpg in a full size pick-up is far fetched today, we should start moving in this direction. Plus, in my experience, anyone who is planning on towing more than 9k lbs regularly gets a 250 or larger. So all we are getting from these wars is a truck that is better for stoplight racing. I just can not see a reason why the popular engine for a 1/2 ton truck needs to be larger than 5 liters.
Reply With Quote
  #177 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2008, 10:55 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 19,040
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
Cuz they are so darn heavy!!
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #178 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2008, 11:23 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 400
dascro is starting off with a positive reputation.
Exactly, a catch 22. They are heavy so they can have the high(unneeded) towing capacity. they need the big motors to move that weight. Big motors and the high weight are killing fuel economy along with being harder on brakes and adding to the purchase price. So we have this very heavy, very powerful truck, that most people use to do the exact same things as the lighter trucks of the past.

This isn't just happening with trucks. Look at the honda civic and accord. The current civic is larger inside than the 80's accord. Honda at least released the Fit for those people would would like a car like the earlier hondas.
Reply With Quote
  #179 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2008, 02:17 PM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 19,040
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
If my 01 had the 3V 5.4 with the variable cam timing and such, it would be fast and tow much better. It weighs about 5240lbs I believe. I'll have to look at my scale ticket that's out in the garage.
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #180 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2008, 02:26 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,112
monckywrench is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.monckywrench is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
"How bout a HP tax, or displacment tax like some of Europe has?"

Howabout we let the market regulate prices?
If people don't wan't to buy economy cars then they must be rich enough to afford whatever they ARE buying. I object to a displacement tax because it imposes a FIXED, PUNITIVE cost on my paid-for, low miles-per-year older vehicles.

Fuel costs haven't stopped people caring about the truck horsepower race because people who can afford new trucks and the insurance and the sales tax don't need to care about fuel costs. (Selling to well-off people is always good practice since they have more disposable income.) Gas in the US is still cheaper in terms of wages than during the gas crisis, and anyone can buy as much as they want.

Anyone who wants an economical vehicle has choices out the proverbial wazoo, including older Civics and Accords (or VWs, I'm putting my Scirocco back on the road) or motorcycles .
I rather like the trend of heavy-duty consumer trucks. I'll have a nice choice of used ones in the coming recession.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.