Found this on the e boss 6.2
#1
01-11-2008, 11:08 PM
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Langham, SK
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Found this on the e boss 6.2
http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Boss_engine
The engine looks promising, don't think I care for the multi cylinder displacement though!!!
The engine looks promising, don't think I care for the multi cylinder displacement though!!!
#2
01-11-2008, 11:48 PM
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fullerton, Ca
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
01-12-2008, 12:03 AM
I want the 777 in my truck lol. The boss sounds like ford did a good job on that motor, Truck versions will have only 2 valve per cylinders? Kinda outdated, but future performace apps will be quad cam and 4 valves! Veady nice. Cross drilled main caps, wow im sold! Also correct me if im wrong........ Twin turbos?? WOW!
#4
01-12-2008, 08:57 AM
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
01-13-2008, 08:17 AM
Postmaster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
01-13-2008, 08:44 AM
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by skidooman
http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Boss_engine
The engine looks promising, don't think I care for the multi cylinder displacement though!!!
The engine looks promising, don't think I care for the multi cylinder displacement though!!!
Mike
#7
01-13-2008, 09:02 AM
Trending Topics
#8
01-13-2008, 09:25 AM
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Langham, SK
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
01-13-2008, 09:44 AM
Originally Posted by skidooman
Ya I was looking forward to some big numbers in the hp category!!!
As for not caring much for MSD, from what I have seen It sure is not making the Chevy and Dodges any better on fuel!!
As for not caring much for MSD, from what I have seen It sure is not making the Chevy and Dodges any better on fuel!!
Yeah looks like another let down from ford. And yes the MSD is a joke and gets no better miliage.
#10
01-13-2008, 01:37 PM
I think MSD is just another reason to jack the price up on the motor, as well as more to go wrong. That 6.2 doesnt sound like a dream, did the 6.1 hemi sound like a dream also? I think that 777 Motor would be even more far fetched because thats way to much hp for the average person to handle especially in a mustang. Roush has one in a mustang that runs 10-11 Sec. In the quarter. Ford has to do something to compete, SO heres to lookin up!
#11
01-13-2008, 01:54 PM
Originally Posted by THE KING
I think MSD is just another reason to jack the price up on the motor, as well as more to go wrong. That 6.2 doesnt sound like a dream, did the 6.1 hemi sound like a dream also? I think that 777 Motor would be even more far fetched because thats way to much hp for the average person to handle especially in a mustang. Roush has one in a mustang that runs 10-11 Sec. In the quarter. Ford has to do something to compete, SO heres to lookin up!
I dont think the 6.2 is a dream, but for the life of me I cant understand why ford didn't get it done in time for the '09
#13
01-13-2008, 02:05 PM
Originally Posted by THE KING
Not enough R and D time. Look what happens when you rush something (Cough Cough 6.4 Cough) Id rather have them get it rite, then offer it in 10!
Oh I'm with you 100% on that, but they could have said there is going to be a 6.2 in 10, that would have keep people from thinking about another truck and wait for the 6.2 to come out.
#14
01-13-2008, 03:47 PM
#15
01-13-2008, 04:47 PM