Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
 
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Engine Swaps
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-05-2007, 09:29 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Schloo2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Swap 302 for a 351windsor into an E150 van

I have a 1989 E150 coversion van with a 302. The engine went bad on me this summer. I was considering a rebuild but I have run across a low milage 1993 351Windsor from another van for a very reasonable price. Would this swap be pretty easy? I tow alot and wouldn't mind the larger engine. Are there any issues with this swap? What should I look at when I go check out the 351?

I believe the 351 was available in this van from the factory. Would the fuel injection unit from the 302 fit on the 351?

Thanks for any thoughts you all may have!
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2007, 12:05 PM
loudfords's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Beachville, Ontario
Posts: 2,856
loudfords is starting off with a positive reputation.
Should be straight forward. You'll need the fuel injection and intake manifolds from the 351 van. Grab the y-pipe from the 351 van too, it's quite different (wider, higher) than the 302 y-pipe.
__________________
Chad - loudfords

1979 F150 351W
2001 Focus
Ford LT75 lawn tractor
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2007, 08:41 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Schloo2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
More questions

I am going to look at the 351 this weekend. It is a 1993 out of a van with 68,000 miles that was rolled. They have owned the van since new and said it has always had regular maintenance. They are asking $500. Everything comes with it (fuel injection, exhaust manifolds etc) except for the Y pipe. He was going to put it in his Mustang but never did,. Now he needs christmas money. fficeffice" /> > >

> >

I was looking through the Chiltons manual for my van, in most of the instructions the 5.0 (302) and the 5.7 (351) are grouped together so it makes me believe the installation of both engines is very similar. > >

> >

A few more questions I thought of: > >

> >

There is a cooling system capacity difference of about 3.5 quarts, will this be a problem keeping the engine cooled or is that just because of the difference in engine size? The radiator size seems to be the same for both engines. > >

> >

I am sure the 351 weighs more, I wonder if this will be an issue on the front springs or is the difference not that great. > >

> >

Lastly, he no longer had the Y pipe, are those expensive enough to be a deal killer? > >

> >

thanks > >
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2007, 08:56 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
Ford Parts Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 18,769
NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.NumberDummy has a spectacular reputation.
Econolines first offered the 351W in 1975 (along with the 460). The 302 was added to the line in 1979.
__________________
Bill / Retired Ford Parts Manager ~ 1962/1997

Part Number Research: Trucks: 1928/2002 / Cars: 1928/2003

1963 Galaxie 500XL / 1965 F100 / 2008 Fusion S / 2008 Edge SEL
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2007, 09:53 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,842
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
The Y pipe is not a deal breaker, all you got to do is cut the 302 Y pipe where it goes under the motor and widen it a little. You should also get a 5.8 computer for the motor.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's, FRPP Mass Air, TweecerRT 282HP
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, Roller Rockers, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, sliding rear window.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2007, 12:30 PM
loudfords's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Beachville, Ontario
Posts: 2,856
loudfords is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hmm, another thing to think about is flexplate. Make sure you get the one with the 351. I can't help you here (too new for me, so hopefully someone else will say) what tranny is in your van? Can someone tell Schloo whether or not he can use the 351 flexplate? I know you can't use the 302 flexplate...

Front springs should be fine...

You can use the same rad too.
__________________
Chad - loudfords

1979 F150 351W
2001 Focus
Ford LT75 lawn tractor
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2007, 02:10 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Schloo2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for the great information!

I have one of the overdrive transmissions, I will have to check which one. (I think I remember 1st , 2nd and OD but have to check).

I will ask him about the flex plate and computer.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2007, 02:44 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 639
alxsnmr is starting off with a positive reputation.
If I recall correctly, the van used the speed density system simlar to the FI trucks of that vintage. You wont need the 351 computer because the speed density system is a bank fired system. The one difference is that the 302 uses an anti-knock sensor where the 351 does not. You can either add the knock sensor, which there should be a position treaded in the manifold for it, or swap for the computer. The transmission should be the E4OD unless you have an AOD, that you will have to figure out on your own.
__________________
Stock 1978 F250 Custom regular cab 4x4 with 351M and 4 spd.

1991 Bronco silver anniversary, 5.8L EFI, E4OD swapped for C-6, otherwise still stock.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2007, 03:45 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,842
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alxsnmr
You wont need the 351 computer because the speed density system is a bank fired system.
Both motors used the bank fired system so that doesn't make any difference. He should still use a 5.8 computer though because the fuel tables will be lean for the 5.8 with the 5.0 computer. If this were a mass air system I'd say don't bother, but the SD system is not as capable. If the truck has an E4OD tranny he's in luck, these also appeared behind 5.8's. The AOD is also OK because it's not computer controlled so an ECU from a 5.8 truck with a manual or C6 is good.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's, FRPP Mass Air, TweecerRT 282HP
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, Roller Rockers, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, sliding rear window.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-09-2007, 08:12 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Schloo2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks for the great help. I have one last area of concern. I was looking at a newer chiltons manual from the library that covered the E150 van from 1989 through 1996. I was comparing the wiring schematics for the 1989 and the 1993 for the 302 and the 351. In 1989, the electrical schematic is the same for the 302 and the 351.

However, when I compare the 1993 schematic to the 1989, there are some differences. I don't know if these will be a problem if I use everything from the 1993 engine or will I run into any serious wiring issues, what do you guys think? I have pulled and replaced a couple of engines in the past, but never "swapped" any for a different year.

Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2007, 12:05 PM
loudfords's Avatar
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Beachville, Ontario
Posts: 2,856
loudfords is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conanski
because the fuel tables will be lean for the 5.8 with the 5.0 computer.
I think mine actually ran rich when I was running a 5.8 on 5.0 computer. Truck is long gone though. RIP 87, had a lot of fun roasting tires.
__________________
Chad - loudfords

1979 F150 351W
2001 Focus
Ford LT75 lawn tractor
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2007, 06:45 PM
New User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2
The Green Thang is starting off with a positive reputation.
im doing the same 302 to 351 swap in my 250 and i was just wondering if anyone knew how big of a difference 24lb injectors would make and if i would have to have the computer redone?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 12:21 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,842
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schloo2
However, when I compare the 1993 schematic to the 1989, there are some differences. I don't know if these will be a problem if I use everything from the 1993 engine or will I run into any serious wiring issues, what do you guys think? I have pulled and replaced a couple of engines in the past, but never "swapped" any for a different year.
Don't use any '93 wiring, use everthing from your truck, it will fit the 5.8 just fine.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's, FRPP Mass Air, TweecerRT 282HP
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, Roller Rockers, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, sliding rear window.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 12:22 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 5,842
Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.Conanski has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Green Thang
im doing the same 302 to 351 swap in my 250 and i was just wondering if anyone knew how big of a difference 24lb injectors would make and if i would have to have the computer redone?
You can't use bigger injectors without reprogramming the computer, period.
__________________
Paul O

1990 F150 4x4 XLT X-Cab 5.0, 3.55, Comp 35-349-8, Flowtech LT's, FRPP Mass Air, TweecerRT 282HP
Under construction: '85 351HO, Dart Iron Eagles, Roller Rockers, Typhoon intake, Crane 444232, 24lb Injectors
1990 Ranger 2wd, 2.3 Briggs & Stratten, 5-speed, 3.08 gears, sliding rear window.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.