Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 
  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Bronco > Early Broncos (1966 - 1977)
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

Early Broncos (1966 - 1977)





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 04:25 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 11
butch27 is starting off with a positive reputation.
'74 Bronco rear

There is a '74 Bronco 9" rear on E-bay. The guy says it is 56-1/2" and is one of the narrowest I thought they were 46" ??
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 10:45 PM
dodmort's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: new mexico
Posts: 288
dodmort is starting off with a positive reputation.
from flang to flang
46" sure sounds to short to me.
have you got a JBGY catalog or Duffs
think it is in there..
have a 68.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 10:56 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 11
butch27 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I got the chart from a site I was directed to on here. I was ??
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 11:00 PM
dodmort's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: new mexico
Posts: 288
dodmort is starting off with a positive reputation.
it is not there and my truck is at my other place but make sure you are getting a bronco set up and not a mustang or car 9"
but
i still cant buy 46" from plate to plate.
i also do not think there is a diff on width during those years.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007, 09:26 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 11
butch27 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks guys: I think this chart? although it looks professional is kinda screwed-up. I too think this is WAY to narrow.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007, 07:41 PM
dodmort's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: new mexico
Posts: 288
dodmort is starting off with a positive reputation.
well
my truck has got to be close to 5 ft wide or better. casue i have two 84 captians chairs in it and the dogs still have room to walk to the back.
between them
ill find this for you if you are not in a hurry.
got my interest up
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007, 11:00 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 11
butch27 is starting off with a positive reputation.
There is a rear-end chart at (biesiade/Fordrears.htm) that is completely WRONG about the width from flange to flange!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2007, 10:16 AM
dodmort's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: new mexico
Posts: 288
dodmort is starting off with a positive reputation.
there is a memeber goes by "numberdummy"
he has this info propbably on the top of his head. if you can e mail him.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2007, 09:28 PM
dodmort's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: new mexico
Posts: 288
dodmort is starting off with a positive reputation.
ok my truck is here now.
backing plate to backing pate is closer to 52 "
68 bronc.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.