Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > The 2009 F150
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read

The 2009 F150 Discuss the new 2009 Ford F150





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 02:13 PM
builtfordtough13's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 784
builtfordtough13 is starting off with a positive reputation.
2009 Dodge Ram Gets Coil Springs For Rear End

http://www.truckblog.com/story-1504-...s_for_rear_end

I think that this is pretty stupid of dodge, because they are already behind everyone in towing and this is just going to keep them even more out of the pack. Hopefully Ford doesn't do this. What do you guys think?
   
__________________
Jake

Mine: 1994 F-150 4x4 Supercab, 351, E4OD, Light Santa Fe Clearcoat/Medium Polomino Accent 155,000 miles

Dad's: 2004 Expedition Eddie Bauer White/Gold 4x2 Every option except Nav 52,000 miles

Mom's: 2001 Focus SE Sport, 2.0L Zetec Fort Knox Gold 131,000 miles



Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 02:15 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,370
Lead Head is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
It says the towing weight is the same. I wouldn't feel that safe towing 10k behind a tundra, or an F-150 for that matter anyways
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 02:50 PM
SMIGGS's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,054
SMIGGS has a good reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a good reputation on FTE.SMIGGS has a good reputation on FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lead Head
I wouldn't feel that safe towing 10k behind a tundra, or an F-150 for that matter anyways
Agreed.

I would be interested to see how much it improves ride quality. ( coil springs )
__________________
SMIGGS
2000 Eddie Bauer
1999 F-150 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:14 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 2,254
osbornk is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Gm put coils on the back of their trucks in 1967 (I think). Didn't work out.
__________________
2004 XLT Regular Cab, Short Bed, 4X4 with 5.4 and 3.73.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 04:17 PM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 3,726
jimandmandy is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by osbornk
Gm put coils on the back of their trucks in 1967 (I think). Didn't work out.
It worked out fine, but was more expensive to build. The 1960-1972 Chevy 10 and 20 series and some 1960-1966 GMC's had it. My 1971 C-10 was much better off-road than a comparable leaf setup due to more suspension travel. The only problem I had was putting in all new bushings at about 100,000 miles. Our 1964 C-20 did look kind of funny unloaded with the big full-floating axle and tall coils.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:56 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 2,254
osbornk is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimandmandy
It worked out fine, but was more expensive to build. The 1960-1972 Chevy 10 and 20 series and some 1960-1966 GMC's had it. My 1971 C-10 was much better off-road than a comparable leaf setup due to more suspension travel. The only problem I had was putting in all new bushings at about 100,000 miles. Our 1964 C-20 did look kind of funny unloaded with the big full-floating axle and tall coils.Jim
I remember the standard suspension 67 Chevys loaded with the back bumper close to the ground, the front end pointing to the sky and the driver fighting to keep them in the road. I guess it's odd how something like that can stick in your mind for over 40 years.
__________________
2004 XLT Regular Cab, Short Bed, 4X4 with 5.4 and 3.73.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007, 08:01 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 18,402
LxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to beholdLxMan1 is a splendid one to behold
Same rearnd that NASCAR uses. 60's Chevy truck with a 9" housing. Very adjustable for racing, not sure how good it will be for towing.
But come to think of it, I rarely see a Dodge towing anything around here. They are usually empty.
I got beside a new Dodge dually Wednesday, and it was much quieter than the older ones. Sounded more like a new Duramax, very quiet for a diesel.
__________________
Jimmy- FTE Moderator
Support FTE....Online Store
88 5.0 LX Mustang
63 F100 351W/C6

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007, 11:39 AM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 3,726
jimandmandy is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by osbornk
I remember the standard suspension 67 Chevys loaded with the back bumper close to the ground, the front end pointing to the sky and the driver fighting to keep them in the road. I guess it's odd how something like that can stick in your mind for over 40 years.
If you overload a leaf sprung truck it doesnt look as bad, but it is still overloaded. I think Dodge is also counting on the fact that almost no one loads a pickup bed anymore, especially the 1500 series. Towing capacity is what sells, as was stated in that article.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2007, 07:00 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alma Arkansas
Posts: 509
Krochus is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Those old chevys with the coil sprung suspension were some of the best riding pickups made, a side benefit as well is that they'll really hook up on the dragstrip also.

Dollars to doughnuts Dodge is doing this for ride quality and handling reasons. In todays world trucks are like 4x4's in that 98% of people never actually use them. So who cares if it'll ONLY tow 8000lbs.
Besides
I don't care what the owners manual says 10K LBS in a 1/2 ton truck is an irresponsible stunt anyhow. These modern day tow ratings are little more than advertising fluff with little to no basis in reality. Dodge will just make up a tow rating that will compare to the other manufacturers made up fictitious and wildly optimistic tow ratings.

It's all about making trucks more comfy (AKA car like) for old people and soccer moms.

Last edited by Krochus : 12-02-2007 at 07:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2007, 07:42 PM
builtfordtough13's Avatar
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 784
builtfordtough13 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Why don't they just do like a coil springs package for the people that don't need the towing cabability and a regular leaf spring that do? Would this not be cost effective?
__________________
Jake

Mine: 1994 F-150 4x4 Supercab, 351, E4OD, Light Santa Fe Clearcoat/Medium Polomino Accent 155,000 miles

Dad's: 2004 Expedition Eddie Bauer White/Gold 4x2 Every option except Nav 52,000 miles

Mom's: 2001 Focus SE Sport, 2.0L Zetec Fort Knox Gold 131,000 miles



Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 02:04 AM
Monsta's Avatar
Sit. Stay. Become a
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Big Island of Hawai'i
Posts: 14,156
Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.Monsta has a great reputation on FTE.
What's the big deal with coils? Super Duty's got 'em on the front and they get lots of abuse. Some heavy duty military vehicles have them on all 4 corners.

Packaged properly and with correct spring rates, I don't see an issue. A spring is a spring.

With coils you'll undoubtedly have the means to locate the axle more securely than with leaf springs. No spring wrap or binding. No axle steering. They'll probably be BETTER for towing!

So, what's the big deal? Since when did coil springs become weaker than leaf springs??
__________________
Ken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
05V10


So many cats, so few recipes.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 09:51 AM
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 3,726
jimandmandy is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
A lot of people here would like it better if Ford and Dodge went back to a leaf-spring solid front beam with kingpins (not me). I had two trucks with leafs in the front, a 1966 Dodge Van and 1984 Toyota 4x4. Ride and handling were poor. Lack of suspension travel made them especially on dirt trails.

BTW, a torsion bar and coil spring really work the same, just in a different package. Leafs are slightly more likely to fail if constantly overloaded.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 10:09 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 20
MCKISHEN is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monsta
What's the big deal with coils? Super Duty's got 'em on the front and they get lots of abuse. Some heavy duty military vehicles have them on all 4 corners.

Packaged properly and with correct spring rates, I don't see an issue. A spring is a spring.

With coils you'll undoubtedly have the means to locate the axle more securely than with leaf springs. No spring wrap or binding. No axle steering. They'll probably be BETTER for towing!

So, what's the big deal? Since when did coil springs become weaker than leaf springs??
I agree. I'd love to see what an OEM heavy-duty 3 or 4 link setup in the rear would look like. rear coils would make for some kick@ss ability off road, no doubt!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 06:42 PM
92f150I6's Avatar
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,111
92f150I6 is starting off with a positive reputation.
I still like having leafs all the way around in my truck. I like the firmer ride I get vs. the newer coil spring ones.

Coils my be a good idea if done properly. As long as the don't use the crappy stamped steel type control arms, and a heavy enough raterd coil, then I really don't see a problem with it. Coil spring rear ends can most certainly wheel hop though, as my Mustang one can, heck, my truck actually corners better than my Mustang as well, but my 5.0 suspension may just be worn out.
__________________
2003 F250 SD 4X4 5.4L 4:10 Arizona Beige
1987 Mustang GT
A bunch of motorcycles, other cars, and a Quad.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2007, 07:20 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: America
Posts: 879
JBradley500 is starting off with a positive reputation.
if i was going to buy a $30,000 truck id expect it to ride like a $30,000 vehicle...i think most people that buy a new truck 1/2 ton dont want to tow with it much anyway and will just drive around town so i think this is a great idea and probably will make them some serious money if it improves ride quality.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy