Ford Truck Enthusiasts, The Internet's Leading Ford Trucks Resource, F150
 

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Small Chassis Trucks > Aerostar
New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login  






Is F-150 Still King?
 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 12:55 AM
TallPaul's Avatar
TallPaul TallPaul is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Metro Detroit (Redford)
Posts: 5,627
TallPaul is starting off with a positive reputation.
What the 3.0 Aerostar Needs is...

... a high stall torque converter!

Think about it. Torque peak is mid 3000s rpm and hp peak is upper 4000s, so you really are doggin it anywhere below 3000 rpm, which is where these vans are from the stoplight. Once the RPMs get up the thing moves pretty good. So I figure it probably comes with a 1500 rpm stall converter, but could use perhaps a 2500 stall converter or more. But would that affect the drivability of the van, especially in rain or snow?

Well, I am not going to do it, too costly, just seems like the real problem short of actually having a torquier engine in it.
__________________
'95 F150 XL, 2wd, 300 I6, 5 speed, 3.08 gear, 166,000+ miles, Flowtech Raptor muffler, driven hard for fun!
'92 Aerostar 3.0 Vulcan V6, auto, 134,000+ miles, Dynomax Super Turbo muffler

www.HonestEdu.org
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 12:59 AM
Bear River Bear River is offline
Former Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 4,901
Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE.
High stall torque converters build a lot of heat. That is that last thing they need. Also, a high stall converter does not change the shift points, which to me would be a better solution. Just adjust the kickdown cable and get an adjustable vacuum modulator. That will make the transmission more responsive to throttle, and will cause it to hang in the gears longer.

What the 3.0L really needs is a supercharger.

The 3.0L is built for economy. And that it does fairly well. It is perfect for old grandmas that never actually push the pedal anyway. For the rest of us, the 4.0L is the only way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 01:15 AM
DCRB DCRB is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 936
DCRB is starting off with a positive reputation.
any one know what the compresion ration is for the 3.0l? i bet a supercharger from a 90's fire bird would fit and work nicely... i might replace my powersteering pump with a blower (it hardly works as is... stupid pump... plus i've moved my car before w/o it actualy running, and it turns just fine w/o power steering)
__________________
93 3.0l xlt extended aerostar
mods: 800 watt sound system. - 2" catback exhaust w new flexpipe and cherry bomb muffler. - 4g alt. wiring - Gutted stock airbox.
"88 civic "STD PLUS!!"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 01:21 AM
DCRB DCRB is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 936
DCRB is starting off with a positive reputation.
also... my 3.0 gets hella quick when i mash it and it jumps up to like...45-5200 rpms... then it shifts to a diff gear for lower rpms... can the 3.0 handle high rpms? 5spd swap is lookin more tempting all the time...
__________________
93 3.0l xlt extended aerostar
mods: 800 watt sound system. - 2" catback exhaust w new flexpipe and cherry bomb muffler. - 4g alt. wiring - Gutted stock airbox.
"88 civic "STD PLUS!!"
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:05 AM
TallPaul's Avatar
TallPaul TallPaul is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Metro Detroit (Redford)
Posts: 5,627
TallPaul is starting off with a positive reputation.
Good points. Mine has a 3.73 rear end. I think a 5.10 rear end would solve my main problem. That or a higher torque multiplication factor in the torque converter (multiplier).

Then there is always brake torqueing. Oh, that's heat again.
__________________
'95 F150 XL, 2wd, 300 I6, 5 speed, 3.08 gear, 166,000+ miles, Flowtech Raptor muffler, driven hard for fun!
'92 Aerostar 3.0 Vulcan V6, auto, 134,000+ miles, Dynomax Super Turbo muffler

www.HonestEdu.org
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 08:08 AM
TallPaul's Avatar
TallPaul TallPaul is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Metro Detroit (Redford)
Posts: 5,627
TallPaul is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCRB
also... my 3.0 gets hella quick when i mash it and it jumps up to like...45-5200 rpms... then it shifts to a diff gear for lower rpms... can the 3.0 handle high rpms? 5spd swap is lookin more tempting all the time...
I sometimes mat the pedal in my 3.0 and out of first gear it usually will shift around 5700 rpm. What a rush!

Also I often run it up to 4500-5200. I think this engine is practically indestructible. Only way to kill it is to run it with a nasty spark knock. Otherwise it will never die.
__________________
'95 F150 XL, 2wd, 300 I6, 5 speed, 3.08 gear, 166,000+ miles, Flowtech Raptor muffler, driven hard for fun!
'92 Aerostar 3.0 Vulcan V6, auto, 134,000+ miles, Dynomax Super Turbo muffler

www.HonestEdu.org
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 11:01 AM
Bear River Bear River is offline
Former Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 4,901
Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE. Bear River has a very good reputation on FTE.
Yeah, the 3.0L is more bulletproof than the 4.0L., and both are excellent engines.

Revving it won't hurt it thats for sure.

You would not need to remove the power steering to install a supercharger, you can probably fit a supercharger in the space above the power steering pump. However, you probably wouldn't be able to run a standard air to air intercooler. An air to water intercooler would work well.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 12:54 PM
Aeroman59's Avatar
Aeroman59 Aeroman59 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kitchener,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 713
Aeroman59 is starting off with a positive reputation.
ATB Aeroman

Last edited by Aeroman59; 11-29-2007 at 12:55 PM. Reason: Twice!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 12:55 PM
Aeroman59's Avatar
Aeroman59 Aeroman59 is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kitchener,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 713
Aeroman59 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear River
Yeah, the 3.0L is more bulletproof than the 4.0L., and both are excellent engines.

Revving it won't hurt it thats for sure.

You would not need to remove the power steering to install a supercharger, you can probably fit a supercharger in the space above the power steering pump. However, you probably wouldn't be able to run a standard air to air intercooler. An air to water intercooler would work well.
3.0 Litre runs like a rocket with Lucus UCL in the gas tank!

Anyhow, great to have a faster engine but then you need to upgrade the rest of the vehicle to cope with the extra speed & traffic tickets!

ATB Aeroman
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 01:14 PM
VanGo's Avatar
VanGo VanGo is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 824
VanGo is starting off with a positive reputation.
What the 3.0 Aerostar Needs is...a 4.0
__________________
----Justin----
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 01:31 PM
copper_90680's Avatar
copper_90680 copper_90680 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,112
copper_90680 has much to be proud of copper_90680 has much to be proud of copper_90680 has much to be proud of copper_90680 has much to be proud of copper_90680 has much to be proud of copper_90680 has much to be proud of copper_90680 has much to be proud of copper_90680 has much to be proud of copper_90680 has much to be proud of
Actually, what my 4.0L Aerostar needs is a 2.0L L4 engine.

I'm giving my teenage son the Aerostar, and I want it to be as sluggish and slow as it can be. 0-60 in two days, here we go.
__________________
Tung

Please check out our guideline
http://www.ford-trucks.com/guidelines.html

Wife? What wife? Oh, The Supreme Commander!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 02:47 PM
TallPaul's Avatar
TallPaul TallPaul is offline
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Metro Detroit (Redford)
Posts: 5,627
TallPaul is starting off with a positive reputation.
What my 3.0 Aerostar needs is a 4.9L I6! Now that might just torque that unique partial frame welded to body arrangement. I would not mind a big doghouse sticking back between the front seats at all if it held 4.9L of gut wrenching torque. Consider the 3.0 and the 4.9 have approx the same hp, but the 4.9 has 100 more pound feet of torque! Also, go with manual tranny to eliminate shifting problems and tranny heat buildup.
__________________
'95 F150 XL, 2wd, 300 I6, 5 speed, 3.08 gear, 166,000+ miles, Flowtech Raptor muffler, driven hard for fun!
'92 Aerostar 3.0 Vulcan V6, auto, 134,000+ miles, Dynomax Super Turbo muffler

www.HonestEdu.org
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 04:51 PM
DCRB DCRB is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 936
DCRB is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by copper_90680
Actually, what my 4.0L Aerostar needs is a 2.0L L4 engine.

I'm giving my teenage son the Aerostar, and I want it to be as sluggish and slow as it can be. 0-60 in two days, here we go.
hahahhahahahahaha couldn't agree more... my first, and only ticket, was when i was pulled over doing 70+ in a thirty five on my 17th birthday at like... one in the morning in my dad's 4.0 awd... i almost went on my self when i saw the lights in my mirror, i was sooooo scared....
__________________
93 3.0l xlt extended aerostar
mods: 800 watt sound system. - 2" catback exhaust w new flexpipe and cherry bomb muffler. - 4g alt. wiring - Gutted stock airbox.
"88 civic "STD PLUS!!"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 05:55 PM
DCRB DCRB is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 936
DCRB is starting off with a positive reputation.
No air to air fmi? why not? and what about a side mount? I don't mind running custom piping and what not...
__________________
93 3.0l xlt extended aerostar
mods: 800 watt sound system. - 2" catback exhaust w new flexpipe and cherry bomb muffler. - 4g alt. wiring - Gutted stock airbox.
"88 civic "STD PLUS!!"
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007, 07:56 PM
fud24682000 fud24682000 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA, area
Posts: 267
fud24682000 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Has anyone done any measuring to see if the I6 would fit with a longer doghouse?
I'm thinking it would have to be installed from the inside of the van after a lot of metal surgery.
Also, it's not a high-revver, so torque would have to be depended upon to do the job.
Ray Mac
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Guidelines - Contact Us - Ford Truck Enthusiasts - Archive - Top

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.