53-56 Hood hinges
#1
#2
Originally Posted by Aussie 53
I have reproduction hood hinges for pickup and they don't seem to give me much height when the hood is open, I can easily bang my damn head on the hood since I am 6 Foot tall. Is there any other options I can use out there. Any suggestions welcome. Aussie 53
#5
the passenger side spring on my truck is 'sprung', but I am a LONG way off from having to figure that out... however, I have kept my eyes open for ideas and seems I saw something somewhere about a tool with a lever/hook setup to wind it to where it should be. Hmmmm maybe it was the shop manual? I'll look later and see.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I've used just about everything. At one point, I used gas shocks which worked nice but I didn't use them after I made new inner fenders. Using, the gas shocks, I kept the hinges but added two gas shocks, one end to the hinge and the other end mounted to the inner fender. Now I'm using two hood props. I'm using 1/4 inch round rod. I bent the ends at 90 degrees. Since I'm not running the hood support rods, I'm using the forked portion for the bent prop rod. The other end, I merely drilled a hole in the radiator cover (forgot the name of it) and made a small bushing which screws onto the prop rod. That sits on the hole and holds the hood up to it's maximum height. Plus it looks good. The hoods are heavy, so to use the prop rod, you need one on each side, or a center one to hold the hood up correctly. The center one is nice but gets in the way when your working on the engine. Some use the prop rods from Japanese cars also.
I was going to do the reverse hood trick, but it seems like every truck out there has done that. I like the original hood opening. That way I don't have to lean over my fenders to work on the engine either.
I was going to do the reverse hood trick, but it seems like every truck out there has done that. I like the original hood opening. That way I don't have to lean over my fenders to work on the engine either.
#9
#10
Originally Posted by fergusonicford
Once upon a time a '56 I once owned had a stock hood and, while travelling about 55 mph, the poorly adjusted front latch mechanism became unlatched.....guess what happened next !!!! Another reason for going with the front flip.
#11
Originally Posted by fergusonicford
Once upon a time a '56 I once owned had a stock hood and, while travelling about 55 mph, the poorly adjusted front latch mechanism became unlatched.....guess what happened next !!!! Another reason for going with the front flip.
The reason hoods from this era thru the 1970's blew open was ppl slammed the hood down. Over time, that slowly bent the support brace that the hood latch bolted to..until one day, the hood wouldn't latch properly and ended up against the windshield!
#14
Secondary Latch
Originally Posted by yield2s
what about the secondary latch, does it tend to fail also?
The front tilt removes a lot of the strength of the front sheet metal and causes a lot of rattling when on rough roads. This is because the front fenders are not tied down to the cab, and the entire tilt is only latched at one point. It is fine for a truck which is only driven around to shows and in a city area, but it is not for a working truck........
As far as the hood hinges, the replacement hinges open far enough, and the originals with more preload work fine, also. I have two sets, both of which open my hood plenty far. The idea of making a hood rod prop is a good one as the wind can come up, and the prop can serve to keep it from moving up or down.
#15
Originally Posted by alanco
I do not agree. If the secondary latch is intact it will always stop the hood from releasing.
In 35 years, I sold 100's of new hood hinges, hood latches and hood lock supports, and prolly 100+ hoods...and it was usually because the hood flew up.
It's a well known Ford trait.
Look in the members galley...you see trucks where the rear of the hood is slightly higher than the cowl.
The cause? At one time, the hood flew up...and that stretches and tweaks the hinges.
Last edited by NumberDummy; 11-28-2007 at 02:03 PM.