Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Ford V6 > 3.0L V6
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2007, 11:24 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 206
jokerforever is starting off with a positive reputation.
3.0L Supercharger

I just bought a Ranger a few months ago with the 3.0L V6. It’s a great running truck but it is ungodly slow. I’m thinking a V8 swap but that’s at least two projects and a few years away. In the mean time I think a little boost could go a long way for my daily driver/parts runner. I could put something together myself but I don’t want to invest the time and money and was looking for a readymade kit. I saw that Whipple offered one but it has been discontinued. Does anybody know if there’s a supplier out there somewhere with one of these still on the shelf. If not, does anybody know of something other than what I have already found with a Google search (which was pretty much just reviews on the Whipple unit). I’m keeping an eye on Ebay and Craigslist for used systems. Is there anyplace else that I should look?

   
__________________
It was then known, that all would be well, unless it wasn't. -PILZ-E

1965 Mustang coupe 250 six
1965 Galaxie "fastback" 390
1978 Mustang II v8 car but not stock-wanna race?
1978 F-150 351M 4x4
1998 Ranger 3.0L 4x4
2001 F-350 Reg cab V10 4x4--FOR SALE!!

Last edited by jokerforever : 11-14-2007 at 11:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007, 11:48 AM
TallPaul's Avatar
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Metro Detroit (Redford)
Posts: 5,570
TallPaul is starting off with a positive reputation.
Yeah, the 4.0 Ranger would have been a lot better.

My Aerostar 3.0 is slow, moreso off the line to about 20 mph where it hits 3000 rpm and then the engine starts putting out more. I suspect a higher rear end gear, like 4.55 maybe, would do a world of good. A chip may help. I know my Aerostar was peppier on premium fuel but we retarded the timing so we could run regular without ping.
__________________
'95 F150 XL, 2wd, 300 I6, 5 speed, 3.08 gear, 151,000+ miles, Flowtech Raptor muffler, driven hard for fun!
'92 Aerostar 3.0 Vulcan V6, auto, 133,000+ miles, Dynomax Super Turbo muffler

www.HonestEdu.org
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 01:43 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
3.0 98ranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
with a rearend swap i would be going from a 3.73 to a 4.55 in my 98 3.0, would that increase or decrease my gas mileage?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2008, 06:44 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 786
6CylBill is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3.0 98ranger
with a rearend swap i would be going from a 3.73 to a 4.55 in my 98 3.0, would that increase or decrease my gas mileage?
Decrease! I went to 4.10 and I'm very glad I don't do a lot of highway driving. If you're worried about mileage, I wouldn't go all the way to 4.55.

Have you thought about chipping it? High flo cat / muffler? Better air intake? A rearend swap is a biggie.
__________________
'94 F150 Flareside/ 4.9L/ 4.11/ E4OD
31x10.50 Dayton MT Mudders
High Flow Cat/ 31'' Thrush Glass Pack
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5QWXM0UO6BY
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2008, 11:28 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
3.0 98ranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
Well, ive been trying to find a chip for about 6 months now, and i just havent been able to find anything that will work with the 3.0, but rite now, i have a mixture of a k and n air filter, tornado in the intake, and a redline powerchip on the MAF sensor, but that only got me about 5 more mpgs, so i figured id try the rearend, i haul a trailer alot tho, would a 4.10 be ideal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6CylBill
Decrease! I went to 4.10 and I'm very glad I don't do a lot of highway driving. If you're worried about mileage, I wouldn't go all the way to 4.55.

Have you thought about chipping it? High flo cat / muffler? Better air intake? A rearend swap is a biggie.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 08:21 AM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 786
6CylBill is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3.0 98ranger
Well, ive been trying to find a chip for about 6 months now, and i just havent been able to find anything that will work with the 3.0, but rite now, i have a mixture of a k and n air filter, tornado in the intake, and a redline powerchip on the MAF sensor, but that only got me about 5 more mpgs, so i figured id try the rearend, i haul a trailer alot tho, would a 4.10 be ideal.
"only" 5 more mpg's? That sounds pretty darn good. I couldn't tell you if you going to 4.10 would be ideal because I've never owned a Ranger, but from what I see on FTE and from what I see on the Ford saleslots a LOT of Ranger's have low gears, many being 4.10. But just to be safe I wouldn't go past 4.10. Somebody else on here should know though
__________________
'94 F150 Flareside/ 4.9L/ 4.11/ E4OD
31x10.50 Dayton MT Mudders
High Flow Cat/ 31'' Thrush Glass Pack
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5QWXM0UO6BY
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 03:52 PM
FTE Ken's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 21,643
FTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputationFTE Ken has a superb reputation
For forced induction your best bet is a universal remote turbo (due to space problems under the hood). Not as good as a standard turbo (far more turbo lag and less low end torque), but less expensive and easier to install.
__________________
Ken Payne
Gone Fishing...

LACK OF PLANNING ON YOUR PART DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN EMERGENCY ON MY PART.

2006 Roush F150 Project: Roush Supercharger, Troyer & My Tuning, 9lb pulley, Level 10 Trans, E-Fans, Oil Separator, Brandmotion GPS, BlueConnect Hands-Free Phone & iPod Direct Connect, Black Headlights & Taillights, Retrax Retractable Tonneau & more.
2004 F250 King Ranch Crewcab 4x4 6.0L PSD project: DP-Tuner Tuning and MBRP Stainless Dual Exhaust.
2000 Ranger Supercab XLT 3.0 V6 project: Bright Box, Mac Intake, Tonneau, my tuning.
RIP: 1967 & 1975 F100, looking for a 66 F100
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008, 09:24 PM
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
3.0 98ranger is starting off with a positive reputation.
thanks for the reply, i think im guna look into finding a new rear end alltogether at the junk yard. i should be able to find a 4.10 without a problem.



Quote:
Originally Posted by 6CylBill
"only" 5 more mpg's? That sounds pretty darn good. I couldn't tell you if you going to 4.10 would be ideal because I've never owned a Ranger, but from what I see on FTE and from what I see on the Ford saleslots a LOT of Ranger's have low gears, many being 4.10. But just to be safe I wouldn't go past 4.10. Somebody else on here should know though
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2008, 01:35 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 206
jokerforever is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hey I found something! This guy in Miami name Thomas Knight is making a kit using an Eaton unit. Looks like what I've been looking for but it's about $1000-$1500 more than I wanted to pay. Oh well, I guess inflation is a B---.

Here, check it out:
http://www.boosthead.com/product.php

So has anybody heard of Thomas Knight before? On his website it said he made turbo systems for Mustangs a while back and I think I do faintly remember his name from a magazine. It doesn’t give a lot of info on what he’s offering and I will do a lot more research before committing to anything. What do y’all think?
__________________
It was then known, that all would be well, unless it wasn't. -PILZ-E

1965 Mustang coupe 250 six
1965 Galaxie "fastback" 390
1978 Mustang II v8 car but not stock-wanna race?
1978 F-150 351M 4x4
1998 Ranger 3.0L 4x4
2001 F-350 Reg cab V10 4x4--FOR SALE!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy