Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 4 Cylinder Engines
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:06 PM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Unfortunately Jeresy
Posts: 160
BADBLUEOVAL351 is starting off with a positive reputation.
2.3 fuel economy

hey yall i'm lookin for a cheap ranger wit the2.3 in it for a comuter. Just curious the average economy on this motor i think it's about mid 20's but just wanna check because my 6.0 diesel gets about 14 mpgs and i want it to bo worth while if i get a ranger or bronco 2
   
__________________
Fresh Rides

06' F-350 PSD EC, Pro comp 2.5" coil spacer, 4 inch turbo back dual silverline pipes, recon smoked markers and mirror lenses, tinted windows, rhino liner, sirius, xtreme floor
93 Fox LX many mods-- gettin ready for 351w swap

Git-R-Done ------------ Got-R-Did
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2007, 07:59 PM
DesertStorm's Avatar
Senior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 475
DesertStorm is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.DesertStorm is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
when my truck was stock i got about 26.5hwy. I messed with the intake an reworked the exhaust;header/high flow cat etc and i got 29 hwy. Now that i have put 33' tires and 4.56 gears it i am still getting 24hwy.
__________________
STG's MINIONS=Refreshment Tech. Provider
AKA=THE COOLER!

94 Ranger 2wd sittin on 33x12.50's.

93 Ranger 4wd sittin on 39's.

Proud owner of 2008 F-150 4X4!!!!!!!!
Lots of scratches and one bent crossmember already with only 1300 on the odo.

p.s. Dont tell anyone but I use it like a truck is supposed to be used.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2007, 11:30 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 55
TLyttle is starting off with a positive reputation.
Lots of ways to get the mileage up, first is weight: if you can get rid of extra weight, do it. Seats you don't use? Take 'em out. Anything on that truck that you can remove without affecting its safety, do it.

I had a 3/4 ton 390 pigup, and I was getting 27mpgUS out of it. The bench seat went out (130lbs), Honda seats went in (18lbs ea). Box came off (est 600lbs), wood deck and pocket sides (125lbs) went on. Insulation came out (50lbs+). Not only did the fuel mileage go up, so did performance: much better acceleration, braking, cornering, and (best of all) payload.

No need to make it look like a racecar, either. The big plastic door panels were replaced by 1/8" mahogany ply, half the weight, and looked fine with a couple of coats of polyurethane.

Innovate!!

Last edited by TLyttle : 11-09-2007 at 11:31 AM. Reason: misspelled
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2007, 08:06 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 1,606
tomw is starting off with a positive reputation.
Without trying for economy, my old 2.3 lima gets in the 26-28 range with mostly rural 45 to 55 mph two-lane and limited freeway driving. Fuel injected, 5-speed, short bed, 1985.
tom
__________________
It's not how hard you work, it's how much you get done. Simplificate and add lightness
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-24-2007, 03:57 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Martin, TN
Posts: 241
83bigbroncoguy is starting off with a positive reputation.
My '95 5spd gets about 33 hwy and somewhere around 27-28 while I'm delivering the pizzas...Get the door. It's Eli.
__________________
'95 Ranger - 2.3L, 5 spd. Almost 200k on the odometer. It says something when you can still drive your truck after a TREE falls on it in a storm.

Drive it until the wheels fall off...Then put new wheels on it.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2008, 02:06 AM
Freshman User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hoosier Land.
Posts: 35
Allch Chcar is starting off with a positive reputation.
Wow. I have a '93 Ranger w/ the 2.3L and 5spd. It's running low in #1 cylinder but I barely manage to get 21mpg after I adjusted for the speedo/odo reading low. I thought I was doing bad till I found that my speedometer was reading 12.5% too low. But still I'm only doing okay for what EPA gave my truck in FE ratings.

Maybe I should try the Honda bucket seats. The ones I currently have were swapped in from another ranger; nasty and dirt stained. But 18lb Honda seats will be quite a bit cheaper, brand new, than the 12lb cobra seats I was looking at. Sheesh you just listed over 600lbs(est) of weight reduction. That's 20% of the curb weight of my truck! If you included a few aerodynamic mods I imagine it would have done better FE. But wow, that is pretty drastic compared to what I did.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2008, 08:00 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 1,606
tomw is starting off with a positive reputation.
Allch Chcar:
If replacing your buckets will reduce weight by 600 lbs, they must be very hard to sit on, being made of lead. I'd check that weight figure. But, hey, what do I know? My truck is old enough to drink. It has a bench seat that I have removed and re-installed by myself (one person) when I put in the cruise control sensor, so I don't see how buckets can weigh that much.
tom
__________________
It's not how hard you work, it's how much you get done. Simplificate and add lightness
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-30-2008, 10:41 AM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 55
TLyttle is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hm?? Re-read my post: Ford bench, 130lbs. Honda buckets, 18lbs.

600lbs is easily saved on something like my 390, a little harder on a 4-cyl Ranger, but it can be done. My theory is, take stuff off until either it stops running, or the cops pull you over...
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-31-2008, 06:41 AM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 1,606
tomw is starting off with a positive reputation.
Sorry, I got lost in the post, and apparently turned off my brain.

Never mind.
t
__________________
It's not how hard you work, it's how much you get done. Simplificate and add lightness
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2008, 01:49 PM
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 1,908
Nighteyez is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am told my Ranger will get between 22-24 mpg because it is the 4x4 variety. I will know for sure when I pick it up in March.
__________________
Jim

1985 Ranger 2.3, 5spd, 4x4 w/3.73 limited slip (carport queen)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy