Have you registered for your free membership? If not, click here now to register!
 

  
Join Our Site - Its free, quick and easy!
Click Here to join.   Click Here for more information
Users Chatting None

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Performance, Engines and Troubleshooting > Other Ford Engines > 401, 477, and 534 SD Engines
Register - Join us, its Free! FAQ Members List Timeslips Calendar Mark Forums Read





Is F-150 Still King?


 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2007, 12:54 AM
New User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12
6t56 is starting off with a positive reputation.
octane for 534

I read somewhere in these threads that these engines have a low compression ratio because they were built to run on low octane gas( i think he said like 78 octane)because that's what they ran in the 70's.He went on to say this is the reason they run hot because they can't burn all the fuel,meaning that the engine is essentially on choke constantly.
the unburned fuel then goes out the exhaust,This might explain why mine backfires so much.It blew the muffler appart first,now the Y-pipe is coming apart!!If this is all true what can I do about it?Is there a way to lower the octane of the gas you buy?
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2007, 03:37 PM
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 597
F6Guy is starting off with a positive reputation.
The lower the octane number the easier it is for the fuel to ignite. An incomplete burn could be due to several reasons such as air fuel ratio, timing, combustion chamber design, ect. not the octane rating of the fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2007, 10:31 PM
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,152
85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.85e150six4mtod has a good reputation on FTE.
Even regular was better than 78 in the '70s.

I remember reading the operators manual for my dad's GI GMC trucks. They had some low compression, I almost want to say in the 6's. They spec'd 67 octane. This was from 1952, but man, 67? The 534 is a product of 1950s engineering, but not early '50s.....

534's are obsolete, and you are learning why....
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 12:53 PM
Junior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 88
big job is starting off with a positive reputation.
I don't know about that , because we had 3 T950.s all 1964s bought new one 534 5x4
and two with Cummings 5x4. I usually drove a diesel and the gas job will blow the doors
of the other two and that inludes Macks Petes etc. You didnt even need the aux trans
they started talking around 3000 rpms tough on gas maybe 3mpg, never broke never
failed, so for $0.30 a gal nobody cared. sam
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 03:23 AM
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 226
Brons2 is starting off with a positive reputation.
octane was actually much higher in the 50s/60s thanks to tetraethyl lead...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 1997-2008 Internet Brands, Inc.
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - JOBS

Ford-Trucks.com and Internet Brands, Inc. is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.
© 1997-2007 Internet Brands, Inc., Please see our Terms of Use / Privacy Policy